Morris et al. v. Travisono, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
RICHARD PAIVA, as successor to 	:
JOSEPH MORRIS, individually and on behalf 	:
of all others similarly situated, 	:
Plaintiff, 	:
:
v. 	: 	C.A. No. 69-04192JJM-PAS
:
WAYNE SALISBURY, in his capacity as the 	:
Director of the State of Rhode Island 	:
Department of Corrections, as successor 	:
to ANTHONY TRAVISONO, 	:
Defendant. 	:
:
In re Motion of Class Member Joseph 	:
W. Shepard for Certificate of Appealability 	:
ORDER
PATRICIA A. SULLIVAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pro se Class Member Joseph W. Shepard has filed a motion for a certificate of
appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. ECF No. 51. The motion is denied because this
statute applies only in a habeas corpus proceeding, which this case is not. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1); Gale v. Garber, Case No. 4:19cv55-WS-HTC, 2021 WL 11691702, at *1 (N.D.
Fla. June 10, 2021). To the extent that Mr. Shepard seeks redress for alleged constitutional
deprivations, he may file an action at any time. To the extent that Mr. Shepard’s motion was
intended as an objection to one of this Court’s rulings based on a referral pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(A), he may file an objection (clearly labeled as such) pursuant to DRI LR Cv 72(c),
which provides:
(1) Time for Objections; Failure to File. An objection to an order or other ruling
by a magistrate judge in a nondispositive matter referred under Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(a) shall be filed and served within 14 days after such order or ruling is served.
The objecting party shall also order a transcript of any evidentiary hearing(s)
Case 1:69-cv-04192-JJM-PAS Document 53 Filed 04/17/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

2
before the magistrate judge within the same 14-day period. Failure to file specific
objections and order the transcript in a timely manner constitute waiver of the
right to review by the district judge and the right to appeal the Court’s decision.
(2) Content of Objections. An objection to a magistrate judge’s order or ruling in
a nondispositive matter shall set forth the basis of the objection and comply with
LR Cv 7.
(3) Responses and Replies. A response to an objection shall be served and filed
within 14 days after the objection is served. The objecting party may serve and
file a reply to the response within 7 days thereafter. Unless otherwise permitted or
required by the Court, nothing further shall be filed in support of or in response to
an objection to a magistrate judge’s order or ruling. Any response and/or reply
shall comply with LR Cv 7.
Based on the foregoing, the Court DENIES Mr. Shepard’s motion for certificate of
appealability. ECF No. 51.
/s/ Patricia A. Sullivan
PATRICIA A. SULLIVAN
United States Magistrate Judge
April 17, 2026
Case 1:69-cv-04192-JJM-PAS Document 53 Filed 04/17/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>