Malih v. Ladwig

2:26-cv-02150Tnwd13 de fev. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
WESTERN DIVISION
BASSIM MALIH,
Petitioner,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 2:26-cv-2150-SHL-cgc
v.
SCOTT LADWIG, New Orleans Field Office
Director of Immigration and Customs
Enforcement; U.S. Department of Homeland
Security, Enforcement and Removal
Operations; U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement,
Respondents.
ORDER REQUIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
FROM PETITIONER AND ORDERING SERVICE
On February 13, 2026, Petitioner Bassim Malih filed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas
Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging his continued detention in the West Tennessee
Detention Facility as an “arriving alien” without a bond hearing. (ECF No. 1-3 at PageID 11.)
However, Malih failed to provide sufficient facts in the Petition.
Petitioner’s counsel has recently submitted a rash of petitions containing few facts. See,
e.g., Cruz-Ruiz v. Harper, No. 26-cv-02092 (W.D. Tenn. filed Feb. 3, 2026). These bare
petitions have required the Court repeatedly to request supplementation. The Court recognizes
that the volume of immigration habeas cases has lately been prodigious. But a habeas petition
“must: (1) specify all the grounds for relief available to the petitioner; [and] (2) state the facts
supporting each ground[.]” Rule 2(c) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United
States District Courts (emphasis added); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) (“A pleading that states a
claim for relief must contain: . . . a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the
Case 2:26-cv-02150-SHL-cgc Document 5 Filed 02/13/26 Page 1 of 3 PageID
<pageID>
2
pleader is entitled to relief.” (emphasis added)). Note that the Rules Governing Section 2254
Cases—in addition to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to the extent they are not inconsistent
with the habeas statute—apply equally to § 2241 habeas petitions such as this. Williams v.
Holloway, No. 14-cv-02652, 2016 WL 1058017, at *4 n.2 (W.D. Tenn. Mar. 14. 2016). Counsel
is cautioned to compose future petitions so that the Court may immediately ascertain the
plausibility of the request for relief. Such efficient pleading conserves party and judicial
resources and avoids needless delay.
Nevertheless, upon review of the Petition, it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) 	Malih shall SUPPLEMENT the Petition within five days of the entry of this
Order, providing a factual basis affirmatively showing why he should not be considered an
“arriving alien” under 8 U.S.C. § 1225. He shall, also within five days of this Order, serve one
copy each of (1) the Petition (ECF Nos. 1, 1-1, 1-2, 1-3), (2) his supplemental facts, and (3)
this Order (ECF No. 5) on each Respondent, and ensure that copies are delivered to the United
States Attorney for the Western District of Tennessee at the following address:
Stuart Canale, Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
167 North Main Street
Suite 800
Memphis, TN 38103
Additionally, Malih shall serve the documents listed above on the United States Attorney for the
Western District of Tennessee electronically at the following email address:
stuart.canale@usdoj.gov. Failure to fully comply with these service requirements may justify
dismissal of the Petition. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (“If the plaintiff fails to . . . comply with
these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss the action or any claim against it.”
(emphasis added)).
(2) 	Within five days after Malih fully complies with the above service requirements,
Case 2:26-cv-02150-SHL-cgc Document 5 Filed 02/13/26 Page 2 of 3 PageID
<pageID>
3
Respondents shall respond to the petition for writ of habeas corpus in writing.
(3) 	Malih may file a reply within two days after Respondents’ responsive filing.
(4) 	Respondents shall not transfer Petitioner Malih out of the West Tennessee
Detention Facility during the pendency of the Petition.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 13th day of February, 2026.
s/ Sheryl H. Lipman
SHERYL H. LIPMAN
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:26-cv-02150-SHL-cgc Document 5 Filed 02/13/26 Page 3 of 3 PageID
<pageID>

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.