King v. Waco Police Department et al

1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 6:24-cv-00588-CRW-DNM Document7 Filed 10/15/26 Page1of3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
WACO DIVISION

LADON KENTRALL KING II,
Plaintiff,

Vv. No. 6:24-cv-588

WACO POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEFF
ROGERS, MCLENNAN COUNTY
SHERIFF'S OFFICE, THE 54TH
DISTRICT COURT OF MCLENNAN
COUNTY, TEXAS, JUDGE SUSAN
KELLY, JESSIE FICKER, DEANNA
AYRES, GEORGE HOLLAND, THE
19TH DISTRICT COURT OF
MCLENNAN COUNTY, TEXAS,
JUDGE THOMAS C. WEST, THE
UNITED STATES MARSHALS’
FUGITIVE TASK FORCE,
MCLENNAN COUNTY JAIL,
HIGHWAY 6, FOX 44 NEWS, DEAN
WETHERBE, KXXV 25, KHADEEJA
UMANA, THE STATE OF TEXAS,
BARRY JOHNSON, JOSH TETENS,
and LUKE MCCOWAN,

Defendant.

ORDER
Before the Court is the report and recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Dan N. MacLemore. Dkt. No. 6. The report and recommendation
explains Plaintiffs failure to prosecute this action and lack of response to the Court’s
order to show cause. The report recommends dismissing this case without prejudice

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The report and recommendation was

issued on August 18, 2026. As of the date of this order, no party has filed objections
to the report and recommendation.
A party may file specific, written objections to a magistrate judge’s proposed
findings and recommendations within fourteen days after being served with a copy of
the report and recommendation, thereby securing de novo review by the district court.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). When no objections are timely filed, the Court reviews the
magistrate judge’s report and recommendation for clear error. See United States v.
Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989).
Because the parties have not filed timely objections, the Court has reviewed
the magistrate’s report and recommendation for clear error. Having found no such
error, the Court finds that the report and recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate
Judge (Dkt. No. 6) is ADOPTED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE. Final judgement will issue separately.
So ordered on October 15, 2026.
CHRISTOPHER R. WOLFE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 6:24-cv-00588-CRW-DNM Document 7 Filed 10/15/26 Page 2 of 3

Case 6:24-cv-00588-CRW-DNM
Document 7 Filed 10/15/26 Page 3 of 3