TBC Koloa Town LLC v. Pizzetta Inc.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed
Intermediate Court of Appeals
CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
06-FEB-2025
07:49 AM
Dkt. 48 SO

NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

TBC KOLOA TOWN LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
PIZZETTA INC.; JOHN HALTER; and CATHERINE M. SHYNE,
Defendants-Appellants, DOE DEFENDANTS 1-10, Defendants

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
(CASE NO. 5CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
(By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Guidry, JJ.)

Defendants-Appellants Pizzetta Inc. (Pizzetta), John

Halter (Halter), and Catherine M. Shyne (Shyne),1 appeal from the

March 1, 2022 "Order Granting [TBC's] Motion For Summary

Judgment, Filed December 15, 2021" (Summary Judgment Order),

April 27, 2022 "Order Denying [Defendants'] Motion For

Reconsideration Of Order Granting [TBC's] Motion For Summary

1 Pizzetta, Halter, and Shyne are collectively referred to as
Defendants. Plaintiff-Appellee TBC Koloa Town LLC is referred to as TBC.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Judgment Filed On March 16, 2022" (Reconsideration Order),

May 11, 2022 "Order Granting [TBC's] Non-Hearing Motion For

Attorneys' Fees And Costs, Filed April 28, 2022" (Fees Order),

and June 2, 2022 "Final Judgment" (Judgment), entered by the

Circuit Court of the Fifth Circuit (circuit court).2

I. BACKGROUND

This matter arises out of a lease entered into on

June 1, 2010 (the 2010 Lease), by lessor Valley Marketplace

Partners, TBC's predecessor in interest, and lessee Pizzetta.

The 2010 Lease was for a commercial space located at the Old

Koloa Town Shopping Center where Pizzetta would operate its

restaurant business (the Property). The 2010 Lease was for a

two-year term to end on May 31, 2012, and specified that, should

Pizzetta continue to occupy the premises after the lease term

ended, all terms of the 2010 Lease would continue to apply.3

2 The Honorable Kathleen N.A. Watanabe presided.

3 The "Holding Over" provision, herein referred to as the Holdover
Provision, stated,

If Lessee shall remain in possession of and occupy
the Premises after the expiration of the term of this Lease
without a written agreement with Lessor setting forth the
terms and provisions of a new Lease or an extension of this
Lease, all terms, covenants and agreements hereof shall
continue to apply and bind the Lessee as long as Lessee
remains in possession, except that the guaranteed minimum
rental shall be two (2) times the amount of guaranteed
minimum rental and percentage rental, if applicable,
payable for the last month of the term of this Lease,
prorated on a daily basis for each day that Lessee remains
in possession.

(continued . . .)

2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Halter, as Vice President of Pizzetta, and Shyne, as President

of Pizzetta, executed a Guaranty of the 2010 Lease (the 2010

Guaranty). The 2010 Guaranty was incorporated into the 2010

Lease as "Exhibit 'G'."4

Pizzetta continued to occupy the Property after its

lease term expired on May 31, 2012. On June 6, 2018, TBC and

Pizzetta agreed to a "[f]irst [a]mendment of [the 2010] Lease"

(the 2018 Amendment) to, inter alia, extend the lease term and

increase the guaranteed minimum. Pizzetta fell behind on its

rental payments by January 1, 2020.

It appears that TBC and Pizzetta entered into a

"workout" agreement (the Workout Agreement) in June 2020.

Pursuant to the Workout Agreement,

• The total current outstanding rent balance as of
June 9, 2020 is $138,653.04 ( covers thru June 30th, 2020)
[sic].

3(. . . continued)
If Lessee shall, at the expiration or other
termination of this Lease, fail to yield up possession to
Lessor, Lessor shall have the option to require Lessee to
pay and Lessee shall pay as liquidated damages for each day
possession is withheld, [an] amount equal to TWICE the
amount of the guaranteed minimum rental and percentage
rental computed on the thirty-day (30) month basis.

4 Exhibit "G" was incorporated into the 2010 Lease pursuant to the
"Entire Agreement" provision, which provided that,

This Agreement and any and all Exhibits hereto
constitutes the entire agreement of Lessor and Lessee and
supersedes all oral and written agreements and
understanding made and entered into by the parties hereto
prior to the date hereof. All Exhibits attached to this
Agreement are specifically incorporated herein and made a
part of this Agreement.

3
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

• [Pizzetta] agrees to make a rent payment of $60,000
via wire transfer prior to end of day on Friday June 12; in
exchange for [Pizzetta's] payment [Pizzetta] will receive a
rent credit of an additional $60,000 toward the outstanding
balance. So the new outstanding rent balance will be
$18,653 and this amount will be Deferred Rent.

• If [Pizzetta] pays the July and August base rent on
time, [TBC] will then waive the September and October base
rent; the CAM will be added to the Deferred Rent balance.
Alternatively, [Pizzetta] may elect to defer the base rent
and CAM in which case this will be added to the Deferred
Rent balance.

• [Pizzetta] will resume rent payments per the lease
schedule in November of 2020, provided [Pizzetta] and [TBC]
agree to assess the situation in November.

• The Deferred Rent balance outlined above will be paid
back starting July 1, 2021 over 24 months.

It further appears that Pizzetta failed to comply with

the terms of the Workout Agreement by not "resum[ing] rent

payments per the lease schedule in November of 2020." Per the

2010 Lease, rent payment was due "in advance on the first day of

each calendar month[.]" On November 4, 2020, TBC sent a default

notice to Defendants, demanding that Defendants cure their

monetary defaults by December 4, 2020. Defendants failed to

cure their defaults by this deadline.

In January 2021, Halter executed an Affidavit of

Abandonment and Return of Possession. TBC filed its Complaint

against the Defendants in March 2021, alleging one count of

breach of contract on the ground that Defendants "fail[ed] to

pay rent, late charges, and interest due and owing under the

[2010 Lease] and [2018 Amendment]."

4
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

In May 2021, TBC entered into an agreement to lease the

Property to a new tenant, Koloa Pizza Kitchen + Bar LLC (Koloa

Pizza). Koloa Pizza's rental obligations began on September 17,

2021.

TBC filed its Motion for Summary Judgment in December

2021, contending that there was no genuine issue of material

fact that Pizzetta's "failure to pay timely rent and abandonment

of the [p]remises" constitutes a breach of contract. Defendants

opposed the motion. The circuit court heard the motion in

February 2022.

The circuit court granted TBC's Motion for Summary

Judgment, and awarded TBC attorneys' fees and costs. This

appeal followed.

II. POINTS OF ERROR

Defendants raise three points of error on appeal,

contending that the circuit court erred in: (1) granting TBC's

Motion for Summary Judgment; (2) denying Defendants' Motion for

Reconsideration of TBC's Motion for Summary Judgment; and (3)

granting TBC's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs.

Upon careful review of the record and relevant legal

authorities, and having given due consideration to the arguments

advanced and the issues raised by the parties, we resolve the

Defendants' contentions as follows:

5
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(1) We review the circuit court's grant of summary

judgment de novo, applying the following standard,

Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings,
depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on
file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there
is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the
moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. A
fact is material if proof of that fact would have the
effect of establishing or refuting one of the essential
elements of a cause of action or defense asserted by the
parties. The evidence must be viewed in the light most
favorable to the non-moving party. In other words, we must
view all of the evidence and inferences drawn therefrom in
the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.

Ralston v. Yim, 129 Hawaiʻi 46, 55—56, 292 P.3d 1276, 1285—86

(2013) (cleaned up).

We conclude that TBC satisfied its initial burden on

summary judgment by providing evidence, in the form of a

declaration from TBC's manager, Cory Beall, and attached

exhibits, that there were no disputed issues of material fact

regarding Defendants' breach of contract and its entitlement to

unpaid back rent. See id. at 60, 292 P.3d at 1290 ("[A] summary

judgment movant may satisfy his or her initial burden of

production by either (1) presenting evidence negating an element

of the non-movant's claim, or (2) demonstrating that the

nonmovant will be unable to carry his or her burden of proof at

trial.") (citations omitted).

The summary judgment record reflects that Pizzetta

continued to occupy the Property and pay monthly rent after the

initial lease term expired in 2012. Pursuant to the Holdover

6
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Provision, the terms of the 2010 Lease continued to apply. TBC

and Pizzetta subsequently entered into the 2018 Amendment - the

"[f]irst [a]mendment of [the 2010] Lease" – which represented

that "[TBC] and [Pizzetta] are the current landlord and tenant

under [the 2010 Lease], originally between Valley Marketplace

Partners . . . as landlord, and [Pizzetta], as tenant[.]" The

2010 Guaranty signed by Halter and Shyne, which was part of the

2010 Lease, remained in effect both during the post-May 2012

holdover period and after the 2018 Amendment was executed.

Pizzetta stopped paying its rent by January 2020, and

after Pizzetta's continued failure to pay rent pursuant to the

Workout Agreement, TBC issued a notice of default to Defendants

in November 2020. Pizzetta did not pay its back rent balance,

and transmitted to TBC an Affidavit of Abandonment and Return of

Possession.

Following Pizzetta's abandonment of the Property in

January 2021, TBC engaged in mitigation efforts to find a new

lessee by issuing intent letters to two potential lessees and

then entering into a new lease with Koloa Pizza in May 2021.

See Tabieros v. Clark Equip. Co., 85 Hawaiʻi 336, 393, 944 P.2d

1279, 1336 (1997) ("[P]laintiffs are subject to a duty to

mitigate damages in either contract or tort.").

The burden then shifted to Defendants. Although

Defendants contend that they established a genuine question of

7
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

material fact as to whether TBC breached the Workout Agreement,

whether TBC sufficiently proved its mitigation efforts, whether

the 2010 Lease and 2010 Guaranty had expired such that Halter

and Shyne had no liability as guarantors pursuant to the 2018

Amendment, and as to the amount of damages, their declarations

and exhibits do not support these contentions. See Nozawa v.

Operating Eng'rs Loc. Union No. 3, 142 Hawaiʻi 331, 342, 418 P.3d

1187, 1198 (2018) ("Once a summary judgment movant has satisfied

its initial burden of producing support for its claim that there

is no genuine issue of material fact, the party opposing summary

judgment must demonstrate specific facts, as opposed to general

allegations, that present a genuine issue worthy of trial.")

(cleaned up).

We conclude that the circuit court was not wrong in

granting TBC's Motion for Summary Judgment.

(2) Defendants contend that the circuit court erred in

denying their Motion for Reconsideration. We review a "trial

court's ruling on a motion for reconsideration under the abuse

of discretion standard." Kaleikini v. Yoshioka, 128 Hawaiʻi 53,

68, 283 P.3d 60, 75 (2012) (cleaned up). "The purpose of a

motion for reconsideration is to allow the parties to present

new evidence and/or arguments that could not have been presented

during the earlier adjudicated motion." Kamaka v. Goodsill

Anderson Quinn & Stifel, 117 Hawaiʻi 92, 104, 176 P.3d 91, 103

8
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(2008) (cleaned up). It is not meant to be "a device to

relitigate old matters or to raise arguments or evidence that

could and should have been brought during the earlier

proceeding." Id. (citation omitted)

Although Defendants contend that "[n]ew [e]vidence

[w]as [i]ntroduced after the [s]ummary [j]udgment [h]earing,"

Defendants' opening brief does not set forth this newly

discovered evidence, or explain why reconsideration was

warranted in light of this "new evidence." It appears, from the

record5 and Defendants' appellate briefs, that Defendants' Motion

for Reconsideration was an attempt to relitigate, on the

existing record, the same issues raised in Defendants' Motion

for Summary Judgment. We conclude that the circuit court did

not abuse its discretion in denying Defendants' Motion for

Reconsideration.

(3) Defendants contend that the circuit court erred in

awarding TBC's attorneys' fees and costs, on the ground that

"[i]f it is found that TBC is not the prevailing party, the

5 Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration attached purported "new
evidence" in the form of declarations by Halter, Tricia Ruiz, Mark Ruiz, and
Allan Beall. Tricia and Mark Ruiz both stated that they are owners of Kiawe
Roots LLC, a restaurant on Kauai, and that they viewed the Property in
February 2021 and then "quickly declined" further discussion regarding a
lease. Beall stated that, while negotiating a "new lease" with Pizzetta in
2012, "[t]here were no discussions of a Guaranty[.]" We conclude that these
declarations "could and should have been brought during the earlier
proceeding[,]" and that, even if they were brought during the earlier
proceeding, they do not demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact. See
Kamaka, 117 Hawaiʻi at 104, 176 P.3d at 103 (citation omitted).

9
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

award of attorneys' fees and costs should also be reversed." In

light of our decision to affirm the summary judgment in favor of

TBC, as explained supra in sections (1) and (2), TBC is the

prevailing party, and we affirm the award of attorneys' fees and

costs.

III. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the circuit

court's Summary Judgment Order, Reconsideration Order, Fees

Order, and Judgment.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, February 6, 2025.

On the briefs: /s/ Katherine G. Leonard
Acting Chief Judge
Dennis W. King,
Monika M. Wurlitzer, /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka
for Defendants-Appellants. Associate Judge

Michael R. Soon Fah, /s/ Kimberly T. Guidry
for Plaintiff-Appellee. Associate Judge

10