Justin Booker v. State of Mississippi

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

NO. 2017-KA-01303-COA

JUSTIN BOOKER APPELLANT

v.

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/12/2017
TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CHARLES E. WEBSTER
COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: COAHOMA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: OFFICE OF STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER
BY: HUNTER NOLAN AIKENS
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY: LISA L. BLOUNT
DISTRICT ATTORNEY: BRENDA FAY MITCHELL
NATURE OF THE CASE: CRIMINAL - FELONY
DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED - 12/04/2018
MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:
MANDATE ISSUED:

BEFORE IRVING, P.J., CARLTON AND FAIR, JJ.

CARLTON, J., FOR THE COURT:

¶1. A Coahoma County grand jury returned a two-count indictment charging Justin

Booker with one count of conspiracy to commit the crime of robbery and one count of capital

murder stemming from the death of Davis Goon. After a trial held in September 2017, the

trial court declared a mistrial as to the capital murder charge because the jury could not reach

a unanimous verdict, but the jury did find Booker guilty of conspiracy to commit robbery.

The trial court sentenced Booker to serve five years in the custody of the Mississippi

Department of Corrections (MDOC).

¶2. Booker now appeals his conviction and sentence. Booker’s counsel has filed a brief
pursuant to Lindsey v. State, 939 So. 2d 743 (Miss. 2005). His counsel states he has searched

the record but was unable to find any arguable issues for appellate review. Booker was

provided the opportunity to file a pro se brief, but he failed to do so. Finding no error, we

affirm the trial court’s judgment.

FACTS

¶3. On the night of December 26, 2013, Davis was shot and killed during a robbery in the

grocery store he owned, Goon’s Grocery.1 The grand jury jointly charged Booker, Cedric

Collins, and DeSean Shields with one count of conspiracy to commit the crime of robbery

and one count of capital murder in relation to Davis’s death. Booker filed a pretrial motion

for severance of his trial from that of his codefendants, and the trial court granted the motion.

¶4. At Booker’s trial, which was held in September 2017,2 the jury heard testimony from

Luther Lampkin, who testified that at about 6:45 p.m. on December 26, 2013, he was grilling

food outside of his restaurant when he heard a door slam at Goon’s Grocery. Luther

explained that the grocery store was located nearby and within eyesight. Luther saw an

individual wearing a hat come out of the grocery store and run east toward the railroad tracks.

Luther heard a second slam and saw two more individuals exit the grocery store, followed

1
Davis and his father, Charles Goon, owned and operated three businesses in
Clarksdale, Mississippi: Goon’s Grocery, Goon’s Package Store, and Goon’s Furniture.
2
Prior to his trial, Booker filed a motion for a psychiatric examination to determine
his competency to stand trial and his mental condition at the time of the offense, which the
trial court granted. The trial court conducted a competency hearing and heard testimony
from Dr. Criss Lott, who performed Booker’s examination. Dr. Lott concluded that Booker
was competent to stand trial and that he was not suffering from a severe mental disorder at
the time of the offense. The trial court ruled that Booker was competent to stand trial.

2
by Davis. Luther testified that he could not tell what kind of clothing any of the men were

wearing. Luther stated that right after the two individuals exited the store, he heard gunshots

and he saw Davis fall. Luther testified that when he heard the gun shots, he observed that

the second of the two individuals had his arm “extended back toward [Davis].” Luther stated

that like the first person who ran out of the store, the other two individuals also ran east

toward the railroad tracks and around the corner.

¶5. Luther told the jury that he ran over to Davis, who was lying on his back,

unresponsive. Davis’s sister and father came outside from the package store next door, and

Luther told them to call 911. Luther testified that he saw a gun laying on the ground beside

Davis.

¶6. Davis’s sister, Debbie Goon, testified that on the evening of December 26, 2013, she

and her father were in Goon’s Package Store, which was located next to the grocery store.

Debbie testified that she and her father heard gunshots, and they went outside to check on

Davis. Debbie testified that as she prepared to walk out of the package store, she saw

someone wearing a “grayish white hood[ie]” walk past the store. Once outside, Debbie saw

Luther kneeling down by Davis, who was lying unresponsive on the sidewalk outside of the

front door of the grocery store. Debbie saw a gun on the ground next to Davis, and she

testified that her father picked up the gun and placed it on the counter of the grocery store.

Debbie identified the gun found on the ground next to Davis as Davis’s gun. According to

Debbie, Luther instructed her to call 911. Debbie entered the grocery store and called 911,

and she noticed at that time that the cash register was missing from the counter. Debbie

3
testified that she later saw the cash register outside on the ground by the railroad, around the

intersection of West Tallahatchie Street and Martin Luther King Boulevard.

¶7. Investigator Charles Sledge of the Clarksdale Police Department responded to the 911

call on December 26, 2013. When Investigator Sledge arrived at the grocery store, he saw

Officer Rip Woodard performing CPR on Davis outside of the grocery store. Investigator

Sledge walked east down the sidewalk and found a black hat with a Mountain Dew logo,

which he collected as evidence and later submitted to the crime lab for DNA testing. On the

east corner of the grocery store near the railroad tracks, Investigator Sledge also discovered

a cash register that was “busted up” but still containing money, as well as a broken piece of

the register. Investigator Sledge testified that the cash register and the broken piece from the

register were dusted for fingerprints. Investigator Sledge also photographed and searched

Davis’s truck, which was parked in front of the grocery. He testified that there were bullet

holes in the windshield and front passenger window of the truck.

¶8. Sergeant Norman Starks arrived on the scene after Investigator Sledge. Sergeant

Starks testified that he and Officer Kendrick Walker photographed the crime scene and

collected evidence. Sergeant Starks testified that he discovered and collected two projectile

fragments from inside the truck, one on the dashboard area and another in the middle of the

front seat, which were sent to the crime lab for testing. After processing the scene, Sergeant

Starks returned to the police department. Sergeant Starks stated that Booker was already at

the police station, and he learned that Booker was a person of interest in the shooting.

Sergeant Starks testified that he performed a gunshot-residue test on Booker’s hands at 11:05

4
p.m. Sergeant Starks stated that he did not personally perform a gunshot-residue test on any

other suspects.

¶9. The officers testified that on the counter inside the grocery store, they discovered and

collected a five-shot .38 caliber revolver that contained three spent shell casings and two live

rounds. Investigator Sledge testified that the revolver belonged to Davis. Sergeant Starks

also found one spent projectile on the floor inside the store near a potato chip rack in front

of the counter. Sergeant Starks testified that he and another officer dusted the entire counter

and the inner and outer parts of the front door in an attempt to lift fingerprints, but no prints

were recovered.

¶10. Sheriff Charles Jones testified that at the time of the shooting, he was off duty

working on a car in a garage he owned, which was located about a block from Goon’s

Grocery. Sheriff Jones testified that on the night in question, he heard a few gunshots.

Sheriff Jones stepped outside of the garage and saw a couple of individuals running behind

the grocery store. Sheriff Jones then got in his personal vehicle and tried to follow the

individuals, and he saw two men run inside a house on Sixth Street and Ashton Avenue.

Sheriff Jones called the sheriff’s office and the police department to tell them what he

observed. He then drove his car down Baird Street and saw another man walking between

some houses. Sheriff Jones testified that the man ended up on the corner of Baird Street and

Seventh Street. Sheriff Jones testified that he was only fifteen or twenty feet away from this

man, and he later identified the man as Collins in a photo lineup presented to him by Officer

Walker.

5
¶11. Officer Walker testified that once he was at the police station, he took DNA swab

samples from Booker, Collins, and Shields after obtaining signed consent forms. He

packaged and secured the samples for testing at the crime lab.

¶12. Officer Walker testified that he took two recorded statements from Booker.3 He took

Booker’s first statement the day after the shooting. In his first statement, Booker denied

going to Goon’s Grocery on the evening in question. Booker stated that he was at his home

from 4:00 p.m. through the time of the incident. Booker denied any knowledge of the

robbery and murder, but he admitted that he heard gunshots. Booker told Officer Walker that

he saw Collins walking down the street on the day in question, and he said that Collins was

wearing a black and green hat.

¶13. Officer Walker took Booker’s second statement on December 30, 2013.4 Officer

Walker testified that in Booker’s second recorded statement, Booker stated that until around

1:00 or 2:00 p.m. on December 26, 2013, he was with Sammy Sharrod. Booker stated that

after Sammy went home, Booker went to Beverly Scott’s house, where he met up with

several people, including Collins and Shields. According to Booker, at about 4:00 p.m.,

Collins told Booker that he “had a lick that he wanted to hit.” Officer Walker explained that

a lick is “something monetary.” Collins asked Booker if he wanted to participate, and

Booker responded, “Nah, I’m good.” Booker again denied being present in the grocery store.

¶14. Officer Walker advised Booker to tell him the truth, and Booker eventually admitted

3
Officer Walker testified that he obtained Miranda-waiver forms signed by Booker
and his father prior to taking each statement. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
4
The State played both of Booker’s recorded statements for the jury.

6
that he, Shields, and Collins went to the grocery store. Booker told Officer Walker that he

did not enter the grocery store; instead, he stood on the corner while Collins, who was

carrying a gun, went in. Booker stated to Officer Walker that Collins exited the store with

the cash register and then Davis followed him with a gun. Booker said that he heard two

gunshots, followed by another round of shots, and everybody started running. Booker told

Officer Walker that he and Shields ran to a church around the corner behind the store, and

they walked to their respective houses. Booker told Officer Walker that Collins was the one

who shot Davis.

¶15. The jury also heard testimony from the State’s expert witnesses. Mark LeVaughn, the

State’s expert witness in forensic/anatomic pathology testified that Davis’s cause of death

was a gunshot wound to the chest, and the manner of death was homicide. Chad Suggs, the

State’s expert witness in trace evidence testified that he examined Booker’s gunshot residue

kit and found one particle indicative of gunshot residue on the sample taken from the back

of Booker’s left hand. Felicia McIntire, the State’s expert witness in tool marking and

firearms examination testified that the projectile recovered from the floor in Goon’s Grocery

was not fired from Davis’s revolver. McIntire also testified that she was unable to determine

whether the two bullet fragments recovered from the truck were part of projectiles fired from

Davis’s revolver.

¶16. Steven Little of the Mississippi Crime Laboratory testified as an expert in the field of

forensic serology. Little preserved the known DNA samples of Booker, Shields and Collins;

he also obtained and preserved a DNA sample from the black Mountain Dew hat that police

7
recovered outside of the grocery store. The State then called Joseph Heflin of the Mississippi

Crime Laboratory, who testified as an expert in the field of forensic biology, specializing in

DNA analysis. Heflin testified that he compared the DNA sample from the Mountain Dew

hat with the known DNA samples from Booker, Collins, and Shields. Heflin testified that

“DNA from a couple of individuals” was present on the hat, and the dominant DNA profile

he obtained from the hat was a partial DNA profile that “was consistent with the reference

sample of Justin Booker.” Heflin explained that he could not exclude Booker as the

contributor of the dominant DNA profile on the hat, but he could exclude Shields and Collins

as the contributor.

¶17. After the trial, the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict on the capital murder

charge, and the trial court declared a mistrial as to that count. However, the jury returned a

verdict finding Booker guilty of conspiracy to commit robbery. The trial court sentenced him

to serve five years in the custody of the MDOC. Booker now appeals.

DISCUSSION

¶18. Booker’s appointed appellate counsel filed a Lindsey brief, certifying that he has

scoured the record and that the case presents no “arguable issues” for appeal. Lindsey, 939

So. 2d at 748 (¶18). Appellate counsel complied with Lindsey by sending Booker a copy of

the brief and advising him of his right to file a pro se brief. See id. This Court also entered

an order giving Booker an opportunity to file a pro se brief, but Booker did not file one.

¶19. Pursuant to Lindsey, we have “conducted an independent and thorough review of the

record, and we conclude that there are no issues that warrant reversal.” Taylor v. State, 162

8
So. 3d 780, 787 (¶18) (Miss. 2015). The State presented sufficient evidence to sustain

Booker’s conviction. We recognize that the jury’s role is to assess the witnesses’ credibility

and resolve conflicts in the evidence. Little v. State, 233 So. 3d 288, 289 (¶1) (Miss. 2017).

Keeping the jury’s role in mind, we find that no basis exists for us to disturb the jury’s

verdict on appeal. Therefore, Booker’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.

¶20. AFFIRMED.

LEE, C.J., IRVING AND GRIFFIS, P.JJ., BARNES, FAIR, WILSON,
GREENLEE, WESTBROOKS AND TINDELL, JJ., CONCUR.

9