Allan Lewis v. Christine Hogan & a.

CourtListener 10309484Nh29 de nov. de 2022

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

SUPREME COURT

In Case No. 2022-0213, Allan Lewis v. Christine Hogan & a.,
the court on November 29, 2022, issued the following order:

The court treats the plaintiff’s “objection to the appellee’s memorandum” as
the plaintiff’s reply brief. The court has reviewed the written arguments and the
record submitted on appeal, and has determined to resolve the case by way of
this order. See Sup. Ct. R. 20(2). The plaintiff, Allan Lewis, appeals an order of
the Superior Court (Howard, J.) granting the motion of the defendants, Christine
Hogan and The Hynes Group, to dismiss his complaint as barred by the doctrine
of res judicata, and as failing to state a claim for malicious prosecution. The
court concludes that, as the appealing party, the plaintiff has not established
reversible error. See Sup. Ct. R. 25(8); Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H. 737, 740 (2014).
The plaintiff’s September 22, 2022 request for oral argument before a three-judge
panel, his September 29, 2022 request that this court issue warrants for the
defendants’ arrests or order another entity to issue such warrants, and his
November 2, 2022 request to amend his brief are denied.

Affirmed.

MacDonald, C.J., and Hicks, Bassett, and Donovan, JJ., concurred.

Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.