A-1-CA-37635 | Omnilex

Texto completo

1 	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 CITY OF RIO RANCHO,
3 	Plaintiff-Appellant,
4 v. 	No. A-1-CA-37635
5 REUBEN PREUT,
6 	Defendant-Appellee.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY
8 George P. Eichwald, District Judge
9 Rio Rancho Office of the City Attorney
10 Gina R. Manfredi
11 	Rio Rancho, NM
12 	for Appellant
13 	Reuben Preut
14 Rio Rancho, NM
15 	Pro Se Appellee
16 	MEMORANDUM OPINION
17 VANZI,Judge.
18 	{l} 	Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed
19 summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed
20 and the time for doing so has expired. REVERSED.
Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Filed 3/20/2019 11:17 AM
Mark Reynolds

1 {2} 	IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4 WE CONCUR:
-
5~.~
----'--------6 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

9
10
11
12

13
14

15
16
17
18
19

20

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Court of Appeals of New Mexico

CITY OF RIO RANCHO, Filed 3/20/2019 11:17 AM
i | >
Plaintiff-Appellant, A. ~ ff
Mark Reynolds
Vv. No. A-1-CA-37635
REUBEN PREUT,
Defendant-Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY

George P. Eichwald, District Judge

Rio Rancho Office of the City Attorney
Gina R. Manfredi
Rio Rancho, NM
for Appellant
Reuben Preut
Rio Rancho, NM
Pro Se Appellee
MEMORANDUM OPINION |
VANZI, Judge.
44) Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed
summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed
and the time for doing so has expired. REVERSED.

1 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
LINDA M. YANZI, Judge
4
WE CONCUR:
5
6
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
7
Julie Vargar
8
JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge

March 20, 2019- City of Rio Rancho v. Reuben Preut, No. A-1-CA-37635

Texto completo

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude