2004 OK JUD ETH 3•JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2004-3
JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2004-3
2004 OK JUD ETH 3Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel27 de out. de 2004
Texto completo
JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2004-3
2004 OK JUD ETH 3
Decided: 10/27/2004
Cite as: 2004 OK JUD ETH 3, __ __
JUDICIAL ETHICS ADVISORY PANEL
JUDICIAL ETHICS OPINION 2004-3
QUESTION:
¶0 May a judge charge a reasonable fee for performing a wedding after court hours outside of the courthouse?
¶1 ANSWER: No
¶2 DISCUSSION:
Canon 4 D. Financial Activities.
(1) A judge should not engage in financial dealings that:
(a) may reasonably be perceived to exploit the judge’s judicial position, or . . ."
¶3 Personal retention of payment for performing a marriage is an exploitation of judicial office for personal gain. But for the judge’s judicial status, the judge would not have the legal capacity to perform a legally binding marriage ceremony.
Filed: October 27, 2004
/s/ Robert L. Bailey, Chairman
/s/ Robert D. Simms, Vice Chairman
/s/ Milton C. Craig, Secretary
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.