334 Or 327•Petitions for review, July 2, 2002
Texto completo
327 PETITIONS FOR REVIEW (52P3d435) July2,2002 Upon consideration by the court. In the case listed below, the petition for review is allowed in part and denied in part. The review regarding liabil- ity for court-appointed attorney compensation and expenses is allowed. The petition for review is denied concerning all other issues. The decision of the Court of Appeals regarding liability for court-appointed attorney compensation and expenses is reversed. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the case is remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings in light of Bacote v. Johnson, 833 Or 28, 85 P3d 1019 (2001). Rennells, Joshua v. Lampert (Al10945J(S49424)(179 Or App 742) DENIED July2,2002 Howard, Paul D. v. Morrow (A109720J(S49476](1800r App 205) Keeney v. University of Oregon (A104503J(849390)( 178 Or App 198) Lawrence v. Clackamas County and Clancy (Al16469J(S49487)(180 Or App 495) McClure v. City of Springfield (A113253)(S48805)(175 Or App 425) Statev. Becker, Dylan Jon (A110387)(S49355)(1780r App 602) Statev. Cunningham, Wendell (Al07209)(S49461)(1790r App 498) State v. Kautz, Dennis Charles (A102986-88)(A103386-89)(A103822)(849456J(l 79 OrApp458) State v. Nevins, Barrett Lee (Al01920)(S49421)(177 Or App 330) State v. Smith, Darrell Darwin (Al13102)(849488)(1800r App 393) Wilson, Marlo v. Morrow (A114266)(S49480)(1800r App 613)
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.