Miscellaneous Supreme Court dispositions, January 19-21, 2010

535
MISCELLANEOUS SUPREME COURT
DISPOSITIONS
(225 P3d44)
BALLOT TITLES CERTIFIED
January 19, 2010
Brady et al v. Kroger I Berman v. Kroger (S057816)(347 Or 518). Having received
no timely filed objections, the court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attor·
ney Gtmeral's modified ballot title for Proposed Initiative Petition No. 56
(2010), ORS 250.085(9).
January 20, 2010
Berman v. Kroger (S057817)(347 Or 419). Having received no timely filed objec-
tions, the court certifies to the Secretary of State the Attorney General's mod-
ified ballot title for Proposed Initiative Petition No. 55 (2010), ORS 250.085(9).
Caruthers et al I Syrett et al v. Kroger (S057803)(S057815)(347 Or 411). Having
received no timely filed objections, the court certifies to the Secretary of State
the Attorney General's modified ballot title for Proposed Initiative Petition
No. 52 (2010), ORS 250.085(9).
January 21, 2010
Caruthers et al v. Kroger (S057946). Petitioners' request for oral argument is
denied. Petitioners' argument that the Attorney General's certified ballot title
for Initiative Petition No. 60 (2010) does not comply substantially with ORS
250.035(2) to (7) is not well taken. The court certifies to the Secretary of State
the Attorney General's certified ballot title for the proposed ballot measure.