In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of O'Bryan B. Whitlock

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of O'Bryan B.
Whitlock, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2012-212021

Appeal From York County
Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-492
Submitted December 1, 2013 – Filed December 23, 2013

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of
Columbia; and O'Bryan B. Whitlock, pro se, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and In re McCoy,
360 S.C. 425, 427, 602 S.E.2d 58, 59 (2004) (adopting an Anders type procedure
for alleged no-merit sexually violent predator involuntary commitment
appeals). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.