In the Matter of Frank Saunders

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Frank
Saunders, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-002005

Appeal From Dorchester County
Diane Schafer Goodstein, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-286
Submitted June 1, 2018 – Filed June 27, 2018

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: York v. Conway Ford, Inc., 325 S.C. 170, 173, 480 S.E.2d 726, 728
(1997) ("The record should include the ruling on appeal."); id. ("An objection
made during an off-the-record conference which is not made part of the record
does not preserve the question for review." (emphasis added)); In re Richard
D., 388 S.C. 95, 100, 693 S.E.2d 447, 450 (Ct. App. 2010) (providing that although
an issue may have been discussed during an off-the-record bench conference, an
appellate court "cannot review issues not contained in the record"); see also State
v. Simpson, 325 S.C. 37, 42, 479 S.E.2d 57, 60 (1996) ("Unless an objection is
made at the time the evidence is offered and a final ruling made, the issue is not
preserved for review." (emphasis added)).

AFFIRMED.1

HUFF, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.