CourtListener 10152839•SCDSS v. Tiffany Carter
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Tiffany Carter and John Doe, Defendants,
Of whom Tiffany Carter is the Appellant.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2023-000717
Appeal From Lancaster County
Debra A. Matthews, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-336
Submitted October 19, 2023 – Filed October 20, 2023
AFFIRMED
Melinda Inman Butler, of The Butler Law Firm, of
Union, for Appellant.
Tracy L. Bomar-Howze, of The Howze Law Firm, of
Rock Hill, and Angela Michelle Killian, of South
Carolina Department of Social Services, of Lancaster,
both for Respondent.
Harry A. Hancock, of Columbia, for the Guardian ad
Litem.
PER CURIAM: Tiffany Carter appeals the family court's final order terminating
her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp.
2022). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly,
we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Carter's counsel.
AFFIRMED. 1
MCDONALD and VINSON, JJ., and BROMELL HOLMES, A.J., concur.
1
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.