In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Tyrone Maurice Moore

CourtListener 10153119Scctapp1 de mai. de 2024

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Tyrone
Maurice Moore, A/K/A Tyrone Moore, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2022-000547

Appeal From Berkeley County
R. Lawton McIntosh, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-155
Submitted April 1, 2024 – Filed May 1, 2024

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, and
Tyrone Maurice Moore, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Deborah R.J. Shupe,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 1 Counsel's motion
to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED. 2

THOMAS, MCDONALD, and VERDIN, JJ., concur.

1
See In re McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 602 S.E.2d 58 (2004) (adopting the Anders
procedure for alleged no-merit appeals in sexually violent predator involuntary
commitment appeals).
2
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.