State v. Richburg

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Tarren Lee Richburg, Appellant.

Appeal From Horry County

J. Michael Baxley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-235

Submitted March 1, 2010 – Filed April 12, 2010

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, Senior Assistant Attorney General Norman Mark Rapoport, all of Columbia;
John Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Tarren Lee
Richburg appeals his conviction for one count of trafficking in powder cocaine
more than ten grams, but less than twenty-eight grams, arguing the trial court
erred in refusing to grant his motion for a mistrial.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority:  State v. George,
323 S.C. 496, 510, 476 S.E.2d 903, 912 (1996) (holding the issue is not
preserved for review if  the "objecting party accepts the judge's ruling
and does not contemporaneously make an additional objection to the sufficiency
of the curative charge or move for a mistrial").

AFFIRMED.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and
LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.