Ex Parte Andrew Garcia Jr. v. the State of Texas

Opinion issued September 23, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals
For The

First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-25-00433-CR
———————————
EX PARTE ANDREW GARCIA JR., Appellant

On Appeal from the 185th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 1891362

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Andrew Garcia Jr., currently incarcerated and proceeding pro se,

attempts to appeal the denial of his post-conviction application for writ of habeas

corpus. We dismiss the appeal.

On October 26, 2009, a jury convicted appellant of the felony offense of

murder and assessed punishment at confinement for seventy years in the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice—Institutional Division. This Court affirmed the

trial court’s judgment on March 10, 2011. See Garcia v. State, No.

01-09-00958-CR, 2011 WL 846244, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Mar. 10,

2011, pet. dism’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication). The mandate

subsequently issued on January 9, 2013.

The appellate record reflects that on October 22, 2024, appellant, proceeding

pro se, filed a post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus in the trial court.

On May 14, 2025, the trial court denied appellant’s post-conviction application for

writ of habeas corpus. Appellant filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s denial

of his post-conviction habeas application on June 3, 2025.

Only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction in final

post-conviction felony proceedings, and we have no authority to review the trial

court’s denial of appellant’s post-conviction habeas application. See TEX. CODE

CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3; Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241,

243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (concluding Court of Criminal Appeals has “exclusive

authority . . . to grant post[-]conviction [habeas] relief”); see also Ex parte Payne,

No. 01-22-00636-CR, 2023 WL 3010957, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]

Apr. 20, 2023, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication); Jackson v. State,

No. 01-22-00040-CR, 2023 WL 3357645, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]

May 11, 2023, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).

2
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. All pending

motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justice Guerra, Guiney, and Johnson.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

3