CourtListener 9986948•Brian Glass D/B/A Limitless Homes and Design, LLC Gaylynn Glass D/B/A Limitless Homes and Design, LLC and Limitless Homes and Design, LLC v. Beverly Walker
Brian Glass D/B/A Limitless Homes and Design, LLC Gaylynn Glass D/B/A Limitless Homes and Design, LLC and Limitless Homes and Design, LLC v. Beverly Walker
CourtListener 9986948Txctapp1221 de jun. de 2024
Texto completo
NO. 12-24-00179-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
BRIAN GLASS D/B/A LIMITLESS § APPEAL FROM THE 173RD
HOMES AND DESIGN, LLC,
GAYLYNN GLASS D/B/A LIMITLESS
HOMES AND DESIGN, LLC AND
LIMITLESS HOMES AND DESIGN,
LLC, § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
APPELLANTS
V.
BEVERLY WALKER, § HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS
APPELLEE
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with a requirement of the appellate
rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a
specified time. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
A party who is not excused by statute or the appellate rules from paying costs must pay--
at the time an item is presented for filing--whatever fees are required by statute or Texas
Supreme Court order. TEX. R. APP. P. 5; see TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1. An appellate court may
enforce Rule 5 by any order that is just. TEX. R. APP. P. 5. After giving ten days’ notice, an
appellate court may dismiss an appeal because the appellant failed to comply with a requirement
of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other
action within a specified time. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
On May 29, 2024, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellants, Brian Glass d/b/a Limitless
Homes and Design, LLC, Gaylynn Glass d/b/a Limitless Homes and Design, LLC, and Limitless
Homes and Design, LLC, that the filing fee in this appeal is due and that the appeal would be
subject to dismissal if the fee was not paid on or before June 10. The date for remitting the filing
fee passed, and Appellants have not paid the fee or otherwise shown that they are excused from
paying the fee. 1
Because Appellants failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is dismissed. 2
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
Opinion delivered June 21, 2024.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
1 The case information sheet from the Henderson County District Clerk’s Office reflects that Appellants
were not declared indigent in the trial court.
2 We also note that Appellants have not filed the required docketing statement or corrected defects in the
filing of their notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1 (docketing statement); see also TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM
CODE ANN. § 51.017(a) (West Supp. 2019) (notice of appeal must be served on each court reporter responsible for
preparing reporter’s record); TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1 (time for filing notice of appeal); TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3(b)
(extension of time to file notice of appeal); Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615 (Tex. 1997).
2
COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT
JUNE 21, 2024
NO. 12-24-00179-CV
BRIAN GLASS D/B/A LIMITLESS HOMES AND DESIGN, LLC, GAYLYNN GLASS
D/B/A LIMITLESS HOMES AND DESIGN, LLC AND LIMITLESS HOMES AND
DESIGN, LLC,
Appellants
V.
BEVERLY WALKER,
Appellee
Appeal from the 173rd District Court
of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CV23-0327-392)
THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered,
it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the appeal be,
and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for
observance.
By per curiam opinion.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.