Larry Dewitt Jackson Junior v. the State of Texas

CourtListener 9501372Txctapp149 de mai. de 2024

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

Affirmed and Memorandum Majority and Concurring Opinions filed May 9,
2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00449-CR

LARRY DEWITT JACKSON, JR., Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 21st District Court
Washington County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 18734

MEMORANDUM CONCURRING OPINION

I concur in this court’s judgment and join the majority’s opinion with the
exception of the discussion of the third issue.

The majority states, and I agree, “In most cases, a direct appeal proves an
inadequate vehicle for raising an ineffective-assistance claim because the record
generally stands undeveloped and cannot adequately reflect the motives behind
trial counsel’s actions.” While this is one of those cases, trial counsel’s
representation also raises legitimate concerns.

At this point, the only forum to develop that record is in a potential
habeas-corpus proceeding. Absent a developed record, this court correctly
overrules the third issue but nonetheless keeps discussing the ineffective-assistance
claim. I do not join that discussion as it potentially poisons the well if an
application for a writ of habeas corpus is filed.

/s/ Charles A. Spain
Justice

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Spain, and Wilson (Wilson, J., majority).
Do not publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.