CourtListener 10706567•Neil George Switkowski v. Courtney Sinclair Archbold
Neil George Switkowski v. Courtney Sinclair Archbold
CourtListener 10706567Txctapp1513 de out. de 2025
Texto completo
ACCEPTED
03-25-00416-CV
106755016
THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
AUSTIN, TEXAS
10/13/2025 10:32 AM
Chief Justice Clerk JEFFREY D. KYLE
CLERK
SCOTT BRISTER CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Justices
Phone: 512-463-1610
SCOTT FIELD
APRIL FARRIS
FILED IN
www.txcourts.gov/15thcoa
3rd COURT OF APPEALS
AUSTIN, TEXAS
Fifteenth Court of Appeals10/13/2025 10:32:14 AM
JEFFREY D. KYLE
P.O. Box 12852, Clerk
Austin, Texas 78711
October 10, 2025
The Honorable Jeffrey Kyle, Clerk via EFILE Texas
Third Court of Appeals
209 West 14th, Room 101
Austin, Texas 78701
RE: Court of Appeals Number: 03-25-00416-CV
Trial Court Case Number: CV40037
Style: Neil George Switkowski v.
Courtney Sinclair Archbold
Dear Mr. Kyle:
This case arises from a child support enforcement proceeding brought
by the Attorney General of Texas and involves challenges to the
constitutionality of various Family Code provisions. Because it is both
“brought by ... the state” and “brought under the Family Code,” this matter
would appear to fall within the exception to this Court’s exclusive
jurisdiction listed in Government Code § 22.220(d)(1)(A). But that exception,
along with the other fourteen, were inserted and indented directly under
subpart (d)(1), indicating that the Legislature intended them to function as
exceptions only to this Court’s exclusive jurisdiction under subpart (d)(1)—
not to its jurisdiction under subparts (d)(2) and (d)(3). See Jody James
Farms, JV v. Altman Grp., Inc., 547 S.W.3d 624, 634 (Tex. 2018) (applying
scope-of-subparts interpretive canon that material within an indented
subpart relates only to that subpart). Because this matter involves a
challenge to the constitutionality of a state statute and the Attorney General
is a party, this Court has exclusive jurisdiction under subpart (d)(2) of §
22.220.
Based on the above, the Fifteenth Court of Appeals agrees with the
Third’s Court’s recommendation that this matter should be transferred to
this Court as set forth in Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 27a. Please let
me know if you need any additional information.
Sincerely,
____________________________
Christopher A. Prine, Clerk
cc: Counsel of Record – via EFILE Texas
Automated Certificate of eService
This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system
on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing
certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a
certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.
Envelope ID: 106755016
Filing Code Description: Letter
Filing Description: 15th COA TRAP 27a Response
Status as of 10/13/2025 1:27 PM CST
Case Contacts
Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status
NEIL G.SWITKOWSKI ns512atx@gmail.com 10/13/2025 10:32:14 AM SENT
COURTNEY ARCHBOLD Courtneyarchbold@gmail.com 10/13/2025 10:32:14 AM SENT
Sarah Longhofer sarah.longhofer@oag.texas.gov 10/13/2025 10:32:14 AM SENT
Deterrean Gamble deterrean.gamble@oag.texas.gov 10/13/2025 10:32:14 AM SENT
Nicole Loya nicole.loya@oag.texas.gov 10/13/2025 10:32:14 AM SENT
Matthew Deal matthew.deal@texasattorneygeneral.gov 10/13/2025 10:32:14 AM SENT
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.