In Re Modesto E. Garza v. the State of Texas

CourtListener 10729879Txctapp429 de out. de 2025

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-25-00371-CV

IN RE Modesto E. GARZA

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
H. Todd McCray, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 29, 2025

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING GRANTED.
MOTION FOR REHEARING DENIED.

Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief on June 10,

2025. We denied both on June 25, 2025. Relator subsequently filed a motion for extension of time

to file a motion for rehearing. The motion for extension of time complied with rule 49.8 of the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and is GRANTED.

This court has considered the petition for writ of mandamus, the emergency motion for

temporary relief, the motion for extension of time, the motion for rehearing, and the sworn record

filed by relator and determined that he is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the motion

for rehearing is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1
This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2025CI07072, styled Modesto E. Garza v. Keera Ficken, pending in the 57th
Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Antonia Arteaga presiding.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.