CourtListener 10806258•In the Interest of A.F.C. and A.D.C., Children v. the State of Texas
In the Interest of A.F.C. and A.D.C., Children v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10806258Txctapp44 de mar. de 2026
Texto completo
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-25-00546-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF A.F.C. and A.D.C., Children
From the County Court at Law No. 2, Webb County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2024FLC002009C3
Honorable Victor Villarreal, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
Irene Rios, Justice
H. Todd McCray, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 4, 2026
DISMISSED
Appellant Jasmin Delgado has filed a “Motion for Nonsuit.” In her motion, Delgado asks
the court to “enter a non-suit of all claims in this cause, set aside and vacate all prior [o]rders in
this cause, and dismiss all claims.” Appellee Kevin Ching filed a response indicating that he does
not oppose dismissal of the appeal but objects to any relief that would disturb the trial court’s
judgment in the underlying proceeding.
We cannot both vacate the trial court’s judgment and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.1(a)(2)(B); 43.2(d), (f); see also FarWest Ins. Co. v. State, No. 08-04-00158-CV, 2004 WL
1771241, at *1 (Tex. App. —El Paso Aug. 5, 2004, no pet.) (mem. op.). Because Ching’s response
has been on file for over ten days with no explanatory response from Delgado and because Delgado
04-25-00546-CV
has provided no justification for us to vacate the trial court’s judgment, we will construe her motion
for nonsuit as a motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to Rule 43.2(f). See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f).
Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. Costs are taxed against the
appellant. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs
against the appellant.”).
PER CURIAM
-2-
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.