CourtListener 10830081•Andrew Patrick Dougherty v. the State of Texas
Andrew Patrick Dougherty v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10830081Txctapp425 de mar. de 2026
Texto completo
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-25-00752-CR
Andrew Patrick DOUGHERTY,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas
Trial Court No. XX-XXXXXXX
Honorable M. Patrick Maguire, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
Irene Rios, Justice
Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 25, 2026
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
On August 22, 2025, the trial court imposed sentence on appellant following a jury trial.
On September 19, 2025, appellant timely filed a motion for new trial. See TEX. R. APP. P. 21.4(a).
Therefore, a notice of appeal was due to be filed on November 20, 2025. See id. R. 26.2(a)(1). A
motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on December 5, 2025. See id. R.
26.3. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on November 21, 2025. He did not file a motion for
04-25-00752-CR
extension of time. A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction.
See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
Because appellant did not timely file a notice of appeal, we ordered appellant to show cause
why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In response, appellant’s counsel
agreed “that this Court does not have jurisdiction to hear this appeal as it is currently filed, due to
an untimely filed notice of appeal by Appellant’s trial counsel.” Appellant’s counsel stated the
“remedy is to file a post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffective
assistance of counsel so that the Court of Criminal Appeals may grant him relief to pursue an out-
of-time appeal.”
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d
208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (holding that if appeal is not timely perfected, court of appeals
does not obtain jurisdiction to address merits of appeal, and court may take no action other than to
dismiss appeal; court may not suspend rules to alter time for perfecting appeal).
Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.