CourtListener 9496299•Kayla Fields v. CM Fawn Valley Owner the Courtland
Kayla Fields v. CM Fawn Valley Owner the Courtland
CourtListener 9496299Txctapp522 de abr. de 2024
Texto completo
Dismissed and Opinion Filed April 22, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-23-01036-CV
KAYLA FIELDS, Appellant
V.
CM FAWN VALLEY OWNER THE COURTLAND, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CC-23-02518-B
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Smith, Miskel, and Breedlove
Opinion by Justice Miskel
Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. After appellant failed to respond to
our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record, we ordered the appeal submitted without
a reporter’s record and for appellant’s brief to be filed by March 10, 2024. By
postcard dated March 12, 2024, we informed appellant her brief was overdue and
directed appellant to file a brief within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure
to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellant has not filed a brief nor otherwise
corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b),
(c).
/Emily Miskel/
231036f.p05 EMILY MISKEL
JUSTICE
–2–
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
KAYLA FIELDS, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at
Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas
No. 05-23-01036-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. CC-23-02518-
B.
CM FAWN VALLEY OWNER THE Opinion delivered by Justice Miskel.
COURTLAND, Appellee Justices Smith and Breedlove
participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is
DISMISSED.
Judgment entered this 22nd day of April, 2024.
–3–
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.