In Re: Mark Milligan v. the State of Texas

CourtListener 9498258Txctapp525 de abr. de 2024

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

DENIED and Opinion Filed April 25, 2024

SIn The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-24-00483-CV

IN RE MARK MILLIGAN, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 363rd Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F-1127465

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Pedersen, III, Smith, and Garcia
Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III
Before the Court is relator’s April 23, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus

challenging certain orders as void.

Upon review, relator’s petition does not meet the requirements of the Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure for consideration of mandamus relief. See In re

Backusy, No. 05-23-00674-CV, 2023 WL 4540278, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas July

14, 2023, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(a) (requiring

complete list of parties and names and addresses of counsel), 52.3(b) (requiring table

of contents), 52.3(c) (requiring index of authorities), 52.3(f) (requiring issues or

points presented), 52.3(j) (requiring certification that relator has reviewed petition
and concluded every factual statement in petition is supported by competent

evidence included in the appendix or record), 52.7(a) (requiring sufficient record).

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

240483F.P05 /Bill Pedersen, III/
BILL PEDERSEN, III
JUSTICE

–2–

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.