E. Wayne Powell v. Virginia Workers� Compensation Commission

0607062Vactapp

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Judges Elder, Beales and Senior Judge Willis
E. WAYNE POWELL
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 0607-06-2 	PER CURIAM
JULY 25, 2006
VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(E. Wayne Powell; Christian A. Parrish; Valerie B. Huber; Powell &
Associates, P.C., on brief), for appellant.
No brief for appellee.
E. Wayne Powell, Esquire, appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation
Commission awarding him $500 in attorney’s fees. With respect to the first two questions raised
by Powell regarding the commission’s determination of an appropriate award of attorney’s fees
in this case, we have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal
is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final
opinion. See Perez v. Rappahannock Area CSB, VWC File No. 219-81-42 (Feb. 10, 2006). We
dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
We decline to address the third question raised by Powell regarding the constitutionality
of the commission’s determination of the attorney’s fee award, as Powell did not raise this
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
- 2 -
constitutional argument before the commission. Accordingly, we are barred from considering it
for the first time on appeal. See Rule 5A:18.
Affirmed.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.