Arriba Corporation and PMA Management Corporation v. Charles V. Hamilton

3048062Vactapp

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Judges Frank, McClanahan and Senior Judge Willis
ARRIBA CORPORATION AND
PMA MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 3048-06-2 	PER CURIAM
APRIL 17, 2007
CHARLES V. HAMILTON
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(Kevin W. Cloe; Angela F. Gibbs; Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, P.C., on
brief), for appellants.
(Ralph Rabinowitz; Rabinowitz, Swartz, Taliaferro, Swartz &
Goodove, P.C., on brief), for appellee.
Arriba Corporation appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission
finding that it failed to prove that Charles V. Hamilton was fully capable of returning to his
pre-injury work on November 28, 2005. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s
opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the commission in its final opinion. See Hamilton v. Arriba Corp., VWC File No. 214-89-29
(Nov. 8, 2006). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would
not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.