Safeway, Inc. v Harmon E. Ball

0127954Vactapp

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Judges Benton, Coleman and Willis
SAFEWAY, INC. MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 0127-95-4 	PER CURIAM
MAY 30, 1995
HARMON E. BALL
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(Charles P. Monroe; Mell, Brownell & Baker,
on brief), for appellant. 	Appellant
submitting on brief.
(Lawrence J. Pascal; Ashcraft & Gerel, on
brief), for appellee. 	Appellee submitting
on brief.
Safeway, Inc. appeals from a decision of the Workers'
Compensation Commission awarding benefits to Harmon E. Ball.
Safeway contends that the commission erred in finding that Ball
proved that he sustained an injury by accident arising out of and
in the course of his employment on December 18, 1993. 	Because
the commission's decision is supported by credible evidence, we
affirm the award.
On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable
to Ball, the party prevailing below. 	R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v.
Mullins, 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1990). 	So
viewed, the evidence proved that Ball was required to unload from
a truck a large shipment of meat that was boxed and stacked to a
height of nine feet. 	When Ball attempted to move a pallet on
*Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not
designated for publication.
- 2 -
which boxed meat was stacked, several boxes fell from the top of
the stack onto Ball. 	He was standing between the pallet and the
wall when at least three of the boxes struck him and knocked him
to a sitting position in a confined space. 	The boxes which each
weighed between fifty and ninety pounds landed on his lap and
feet. 	Although Ball did not experience pain at the time of this
incident, when he awoke the next morning, he experienced
disabling back pain.
"In order to carry [the] burden of proving an 'injury by
accident,' a claimant must prove that the cause of [the] injury
was an identifiable incident or sudden precipitating event and
that it resulted in an obvious sudden mechanical or structural
change in the body." 	Morris v. Morris, 238 Va. 578, 589, 385
S.E.2d 858, 865 (1989). 	The commission found that Ball's back
condition, which first manifested itself the morning following
the incident, was the result of boxes falling on him at work.
Ball's testimony provides ample credible evidence to support the
commission's finding. 	Thus, that finding is conclusive on this
appeal. 	See James v. Capitol Steel Constr. Co., 8 Va. App. 512,
515, 382 S.E.2d 487, 488 (1989).
The commission also considered the testimony of Ball's
supervisor, Ball's recorded statement, and Safeway's First Report
of Accident, and the commission resolved any conflicts in this
evidence in favor of Ball. 	Moreover, the medical report by the
attending physician, Dr. Jerry M. Hahn, provides credible
- 3 -
evidence that links the incident to medical causation. 	"In
determining whether credible evidence exists, [this Court] does
not retry the facts, reweigh the preponderance of the evidence,
or make its own determination of the credibility of the
witnesses." 	Wagner Enters., Inc., v. Brooks, 12 Va. App. 890,
894, 407 S.E.2d 32, 35 (1991).
Finally, that Ball did not experience back pain until the
morning after the incident is not fatal to his claim. 	"Morris
[v. Morris, 238 Va. 578, 385 S.E.2d 858 (1989)] did not require a
showing of immediate onset of the symptoms of the injury."
Hercules, Inc. v. Gunther, 13 Va. App. 357, 364 n.2, 412 S.E.2d
185, 189 n.2 (1991).
For these reasons, we affirm the commission's decision.
Affirmed.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.