1812952•Eldora James v Best Products Company, Inc., et al.
Texto completo
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff ELDORA JAMES v. Record No. 1812-95-2 MEMORANDUM OPINION* PER CURIAM BEST PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC. MARCH 12, 1996 AND TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Thomas Stark, IV; Williamson & Lavecchia, on brief), for appellant. (P. Dawn Bishop; Matthew J. Ide; Sands, Anderson, Marks & Miller, on brief), for appellees. Eldora James appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission denying her application seeking compensation for an occupational disease. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule 5A:27. This appeal is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in The Stenrich Group v. Jemmott, ___ Va. ___, ___, ___ S.E.2d ___, ___ (1996) (holding that "job-related impairments resulting from cumulative trauma caused by repetitive motion, however labeled or however defined, are, as a matter of law, not compensable under the present provisions of the Act"). *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.
2 Accordingly, we affirm the commission's decision. Affirmed.
1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff ELDORA JAMES Vv. Record No. 1812-95-2 MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM BEST PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC. MARCH 12, 1996 AND TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS ' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Thomas Stark, IV; Williamson & Lavecchia, on brief), for appellant. (P. Dawn Bishop; Matthew J. Ide; Sands, Anderson, Marks & Miller, on brief), for appellees. Eldora James appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission denying her application seeking compensation for an occupational disease. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule 5A:27. This appeal is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in The Stenrich Group v. Jemmott, Va. , , S.E.2d , (1996) (holding that "job-related impairments resulting from cumulative trauma caused by repetitive motion, however labeled or however defined, are, aS a matter of law, not compensable under the present provisions of the Act"). "Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. Accordingly, we affirm the commission's decision. Affirmed.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.