Phyllis A. Filoso v. Prince William County School Board

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Judges Benton, Humphreys and Senior Judge Overton
PHYLLIS A. FILOSO
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 2587-04-4 	PER CURIAM
MARCH 15, 2005
PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY
SCHOOL BOARD
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(Phyllis A. Filoso, pro se, on briefs).
(Thomas C. Palmer, Jr.; Brault Palmer Grove White & Steinhilber
LLP, on brief), for appellee.
Phyllis A. Filoso appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission denying
her claim for temporary total disability benefits and medical benefits. The commission ruled that
her claim is barred by the statute of limitations. The commission also noted that Filoso appealed
the denial of her claim in VWC File No. 211-37-67, but that she did not appeal the denials of her
two claims in VWC File Nos. 208-26-19 and 208-77-64. We have reviewed the record and the
commission’s opinion, and we hold that the record establishes no reversible error. Accordingly,
for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion, we affirm the commission’s ruling
that the claim is barred by the statute of limitations. See Filoso v. Prince William (County of)
School Board, VWC File Nos. 208-26-19, 208-77-64, 211-37-67 (Oct. 5, 2004). We dispense
with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.

- 2 -
Filoso filed a “Motion to Amend Designation of Appendix” and a “Motion for Extension
of Time” and “Motion for Sanctions.” The School Board filed an “Appellee’s Opposition to
Appellant’s Motion to Amend Appendix and Motion for Extension of Time” and a “Motion to
Dismiss.” Upon consideration of these motions and pleadings, we deny the motions.
Affirmed.