Personal Restraint Petition Of Zakaria Aweis Dere

Citations and pin cites are based on the Westlaw online version of the cited material.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
DIVISION ONE
IN THE MATTER OF THE PERSONAL
RESTRAINT OF
ZAKARIA AWEIS DERE,
Petitioner.
No. 77873-1-I
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
PER CURIAM – Petitioner Zakaria Dere was convicted and sentenced in
2014 on one count of robbery in the first degree in King County Superior Court
Cause 	No. 	14-1-00051-7 	SEA. 	This 	court 	affirmed 	Dere’s 	conviction 	and
sentence. See State v. Mohamed, 195 Wn. App. 161, review denied, 187 Wn.2d
1004 (2017). 	On December 28, 2017, Dere filed a personal restraint petition
challenging his judgment and sentence on the grounds of newly discovered
evidence and ineffective assistance of counsel. 	On March 21, 2019, this court
issued an order of transfer directing the superior court to conduct a reference
hearing to determine (1) the reliability and credibility of co-defendant Bashir
Mohamed’s recantation statement regarding Dere’s role in the crime and (2)
defense counsel’s reasons for not interviewing Mohamed Abdi Ahmed, who
witnessed the crime. 	Due to various unforeseen circumstances, the reference
hearing has not yet occurred.
On April 7, 2020, Dere filed an emergency motion seeking to be released
from prison on bail or personal recognizance pursuant to RAP 16.15(b). 	Dere’s

No. 77873-1-I/2
- 2 -
petition included a letter from his friends and family pledging that he is not a danger
to the community, that he will attend all court hearings, and that upon release he
will reside with his sister and her family until the reference hearing occurs. 	Dere
further asserts that release pending a reference hearing is appropriate to reduce
crowding 	and 	allow 	for 	social 	distancing 	to 	reduce 	the 	risk 	of 	contracting
coronavirus in prison. 	This court requested a response to Dere’s motion, which
the State filed on April 14, 2020. A panel of this court, having reviewed the motion
and response, DENIES Dere’s emergency motion.
RAP 16.15(b) provides:
(b) 	Release by Appellate Court of Person in Custody. 	The
appellate 	court 	may 	release 	a 	petitioner 	on 	bail 	or 	personal
recognizance before deciding the petition, if release prevents further
unlawful confinement and it is unjust to delay the petitioner’s release
until the petition is determined. 	The appellate court or the superior
court in its decision on the merits, or by separate order after a
decision on the merits, may release a petitioner on bail or on
personal recognizance. 	The appellate court may direct the release
of petitioner with the conditions of release to be determined by a trial
court.
RAP 16.15(b) does not contemplate the release of a defendant before the court
had addressed the merits of that defendant’s petition. 	The first sentence of this
rule was intended to facilitate release of a petitioner in advance of the time required
to prepare and circulate an opinion. 	3 KARL B. TEGLAND, W ASHINGTON PRACTICE:
RULES PRACTICE RAP 16.15 (8th ed. 2014). Release is generally authorized under
RAP 16.15(b) only when the defendant has demonstrated a “clearly meritorious
case.” 1 W ASH. STATE BAR ASS ’N, W ASHINGTON APPELLATE P RACTICE D ESKBOOK §
24.7(13) (4th ed. 2016). We are not in a position to make such a determination on
an emergency basis prior to the reference hearing.

No. 77873-1-I/3
- 3 -
Moreover, absent statutory authority, there is no right to release on bail once
a conviction is final. 	State v. Reese, 15 Wn. App. 619, 621-22, 550 P.2d 1179
(1976). 	Dere’s convictions became final in 2017 when the Washington Supreme
Court denied his petition for review after this court rejected his direct appeal. Until
relief is granted in a personal restraint petition, the convictions are considered final
for all purposes. State v. LaBeur, 33 Wn. App. 762, 764, 657 P.2d 802 (1983).
In order to warrant release from prison pending the resolution of a habeas
petition, a federal petitioner must show a “substantial question” making the
application for release “exceptional and deserving of special treatment in the
interests of justice.” Aronson v. May, 85 S.Ct. 3, 5, 13 L. Ed. 2d 6 (1964); Martin
v. Solem, 801 F. 2d 324, 329 (8th Cir. 1986). 	Dere has not demonstrated any
special circumstances warranting his release pending his reference hearing.
Although Dere’s motion asserts that the reference hearing may be delayed for an
extended period of time, the parties subsequently agreed that the hearing will take
place on June 15, 2020. 	This relatively brief additional delay does not justify the
requested relief.
We recognize that the novel coronavirus pandemic has raised concerns
about the risk of infection that the prison population faces. 	However, in a
mandamus action brought by a group of inmates, Colvin v. Inslee, No. 98317-8,
our Supreme Court recently ruled that the petitioners had not shown that the
Department of Corrections (DOC) is currently failing to perform a mandatory,
nondiscretionary duty in addressing the COVID-19 risk or that DOC’s actions
constitute deliberate indifference to this risk.

No. 77873-1-I/4
- 4 -
Moreover, Dere does not assert that he falls within any of the populations
at high risk of infection. He has presented no evidence that he has any increased
risk factors under current standards set by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.1 Further, according to the DOC website, on April 13, 2020, Governor
Inslee and the DOC began to implement steps in response to the COVID-19
pandemic to mitigate any risk to its incarcerated population, including emergency
commutations of sentences for certain low-risk, non-violent offenders,2 early
release of certain incarcerated individuals through furloughs or emergency medical
releases,3 and allowing others to serve the remainder of their sentences in the
community.4 While Dere does not appear to qualify for release under any of these
programs, the stated goal is to reduce the overall prison population, thereby
mitigating any risks Dere may continue to face while incarcerated.
Based on the record before us, Dere’s motion for emergency release is
DENIED.
1 https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/people-at-higher-risk.html
2 https://www.governor.wa.gov/sites/default/files/COVID-19%20-
%20Commutation%20Order%204.15.20%20%28tmp%29.pdf
3 https://www.governor.wa.gov/sites/default/files/proclamations/20-50%20-%20COVID-
19%20Reducing%20Prison%20Population.pdf
4 https://www.doc.wa.gov/news/2020/04162020p.htm