State Of Washington, Respondent V. Willie L. Barnes, Appellant

THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
Respondent,
v.
WILLIE BARNES, JR.,
Appellant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 80528-2-I
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
PER CURIAM — Willie Barnes appeals the financial obligations imposed following
his guilty plea to second degree assault. He contends, and the State concedes, that the
court erred in imposing supervision fees because he is indigent, the fees are not
mandatory, and the court expressed its intent to waive all non-mandatory financial
obligations. Barnes’ contention is supported by the record and the decisions in State v.
Ramirez, 191 Wn.2d 732, 426 P.3d 714 (2018) and State v. Dillon, 12 Wn. App. 2d 133,
456 P.3d 1199 (2020) (where defendant is indigent and record demonstrates court’s
intent to waive non-mandatory financial obligations, boilerplate financial obligations
should be stricken). We accept the concession of error and remand with directions to
strike the supervision fee from the judgment and sentence.