Ava Levine, Respondent V. Creative Change Counseling Inc., Appellant

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
AVA LEVINE,
Respondent,
v.
CREATIVE CHANGE COUNSELING,
INC., FOREST WOODLEY, SILVA
BELL-WOODLEY, husband and wife,
and the marital community thereof,
Appellants,
DAN OWENS, JANE DOE OWENS,
and the marital community thereof,
JANET WHITE, JOHN DOE WHITE,
and the marital community thereof,
Defendants.
No. 73559-4-1
DIVISION ONE
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
FILED: August 8, 2016
r-J 	V"' O
T&Z. 	m.....
I 	..>
CO 	:}~~~
cr-
Trickey, A.C.J. —A party seeking appellate review must provide a record
sufficient to review the issues raised on appeal. 	On appeal, Creative Change
Counseling Centers challenge evidentiary 	rulings 	and the 	sufficiency of the
evidence to support the trial court's decision. Because the record is inadequate to
review these claims, we affirm.
FACTS
On June 17, 2015, Creative Change Counseling Centers, Inc., Sylvia Bell-
Woodley, and Forest Woodley (collectively CCCC), defendants below, filed 	a
notice of appeal challenging an adverse judgment of about $363,000 entered in
favor of Ava Levine. 	Following a bench trial, the trial court found that CCCC
violated the Washington Law Against Discrimination (WLAD), chapter 49.60 RCW,
when it demoted and then terminated Levine.

No. 73559-4-1 / 2
In the statement of arrangements, counsel for CCCC ordered transcription
of the verbatim report of proceedings. 	See RAP 9.2(b). 	Counsel later informed
the court that CCCC would not be providing a verbatim report of proceedings.
Counsel then designated a total of 21 pages of clerk's papers, consisting of the
clerk's minute entries, a one-page witness record, and a list of the trial exhibits.
The record does not include the exhibits themselves.
On appeal, CCCC challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the
trial court's finding of discrimination, the amount of damages, and proximate cause.
CCCC also claims the trial court should have excluded evidence of special and
general damages.
The appellant has the burden to provide a record sufficient to review the
issues raised on appeal. Story v. Shelter Bay Co.. 52 Wn. App. 334, 345,760 P.2d
368 (1988). 	"If the party seeking review intends to urge that a verdict or finding of
fact is not supported by the evidence, the party should include in the record all
evidence relevant to the disputed verdict or finding." 	RAP 9.2(b).
CCCC has not provided a verbatim report of proceedings or any record of
the 	evidence 	before 	the 	trial court. 	Consequently, 	we 	cannot 	review the
evidentiary 	basis for 	the trial 	court's finding 	of discrimination 	and the other
challenged findings. 	Nor can we review CCCC's apparent challenge to the trial
court's evidentiary rulings. 	Because CCCC failed to provide a relevant appellate
record, the factual allegations in its brief are unsupported by any reference to the
record, in violation of RAP 10.3(a)(6) (party must support arguments in brief with

No. 73559-4-1 / 3
"references to 	relevant parts of the record").1 	CCCC's failure to 	provide an
adequate record precludes any meaningful appellate review. See Bulzomi v. Dep't
of Labor & Indus.. 72 Wn. App. 522, 525, 864 P.2d 996 (1994).
Levine 	requests 	an 	award 	of attorney 	fees 	on 	appeal. 	Under 	RCW
49.60.030(2), a successful plaintiff who also prevails on appeal is entitled to an
award of reasonable attorney fees and costs on appeal. 	Martini v. Boeing Co..
137 Wn.2d 357, 377, 971 P.2d 45 (1999). Levine is therefore awarded reasonable
attorney fees and costs on appeal, payable by CCCC, subject to compliance with
RAP 18.1. Levine's request for the imposition of CR 11 sanctions against counsel
for CCCC is denied.
Affirmed.
lr\ci<ey 	A £~^
WE CONCUR:
£*X>3~' 	^e^,
1 The respondent's brief also refers to documents outside of the record on appeal, in
violation of RAP 10.3(a)(6).