0308007 Informal Interpretation

us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-009d1b4ffad8340593dfd8ef12be6a2a0308007 Informal InterpretationGuidance

Abrir fonte
Date
Rule
802.3, 802.51, 802.4
Staff
M Verne
Response/Comments
802.51 cannot exempt this since the issuer is US. However if the license is only for rights to oil reserves the transactions can be exempted under 802.3 / 802.4

Question

From: (redacted)
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:45 PM
To: Verne, Michael
Subject: Possible exemption FOR fOREIGN aSSETS"

Dear Mike

I'm sorry to bother you but I can't reach anyone else and this question is sort of urgent.

--The question is whether a filing is required when a foreign company (no US sales) acquires a US company whose sole asset is its license interest in a foreign oil production operation.

--The oil is sold to unrelated third parties in Europe: It may or may not enter the US, but the company doesn't sell it here.

--802.5(b)(1) (Staff comment 802.51) requires both companies to be foreign, which obviously excludes the US company.

--I guess the question is whether there could be any informal interpretation under any rule on the basis that the US sub has no operations in the US, no sales in the US, and its sole asset is a foreign license. In other words, the purpose of the rules would be met, because, aside from the fact of Delaware incorporation, the target company (though not its large US parent) really has no economic connection with the US.


Complete printed PDF page 1

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.