n-2000-9.pdf

Preserve advance releases and the authoritative Internal Revenue Bulletin rendition; directory timestamps are file-publication metadata, not legal effective dates. HTML bulletins begin June 2003; earlier available issues require full PDF parsing.

This collection currently includes the publisher’s available advance-release directory. Historical bulletin renditions are discovered separately; an advance-release record alone does not certify the collection archive complete.

Part III - Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous
Closing agreements concerning variable annuity contracts
Notice 2000-9
PURPOSE
This notice reminds issuers of variable annuity contracts that the special rules of
§ 817(h)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and § 1.817-5(h)(3) of the Income Tax
Regulations do not apply in determining whether the investments of a segregated asset
account with respect to those contracts are adequately diversified for purposes of
§ 817(h). For a limited period of time, this notice also permits issuers of failed variable
annuity contracts based on one or more accounts that would have satisfied the special
rules for accounts with respect to variable life insurance contracts to obtain the relief
described in § 1.817-5(a)(2) through a reduced payment amount.
BACKGROUND
Section 817(h) of the Code provides that a variable contract (other than a
pension plan contract) based on a segregated asset account shall not be treated as an
annuity, endowment, or life insurance contract if the investments made by the account
are not adequately diversified in accordance with regulations prescribed by the
Secretary. Section 1.817-5(a)(1) of the regulations provides generally that a variable
contract is not treated as an annuity, endowment, or life insurance contract for any
calendar quarter period in which the investments of an account on which the contract is
based are not adequately diversified. Thus, any income on the contract within the

2
meaning of § 7702(g) is treated as ordinary income received or accrued by the contract
holder during that period and any subsequent period.
Under § 1.817-5(b)(1), the investments of a segregated asset account are
considered adequately diversified for purposes of § 817(h) only if–
(1) No more than 55% of the value of the total assets of the account is
represented by any one investment;
(2) No more than 70% of the value of the total assets of the account is
represented by any two investments;
(3) No more than 80% of the value of the total assets of the account is
represented by any three investments; and
(4) No more than 90% of the value of the total assets of the account is
represented by any four investments.
In addition, § 817(h)(2) and § 1.817-5(b)(2) provide a safe harbor under which the
investments of a segregated asset account are considered adequately diversified if the
account meets the requirements of § 851(b)(3), and no more than 55% of the value of
the total assets of the account is attributable to cash, cash items, government
securities, and securities of other regulated investment companies. For purposes of
testing diversification, all securities of the same issuer are treated as a single
investment, and each government agency or instrumentality is treated as a separate
issuer. See
§ 1.817-5(b)(1)(ii).
Under § 817(h)(3), the investments made by a segregated asset account with
respect to a variable life insurance contract are treated as adequately diversified to the

3
extent the account is invested in securities issued by the United States Treasury.
Section 1.817-5(b)(3) provides alternative diversification requirements for a segregated
asset account invested in United States Treasury securities. Both § 817(h)(3) and
§ 1.817-5(b)(3) apply only to segregated asset accounts with respect to variable life
insurance contracts; neither applies to such accounts with respect to variable annuity
contracts.
Under § 1.817-5(a)(2), the investments of an inadequately diversified
segregated asset account are nevertheless treated as diversified if three
requirements are satisfied. First, the issuer or holder of a variable contract based on
the account must show that the failure to satisfy the diversification requirements was
inadvertent. Section 1.817-5(a)(2)(i). Second, the account must satisfy the
diversification requirements within a reasonable time after discovery of such failure.
Section 1.817-5(a)(2)(ii). Third, the issuer or holder of the variable contract must agree
to make such adjustments or pay such amounts as may be required by the
Commissioner with respect to the period or periods during which the investments of the
account were not diversified. The amount required to be paid by the Commissioner
shall be based upon the tax that would have been owed by the contract holders if they
were treated as receiving the income on the contract for the periods during which one
or more accounts were not adequately diversified. Section 1.817-5(a)(2)(iii).
Rev. Rul. 91-17, 1991-1 C.B. 190, provides that if a variable contract does not
satisfy the diversification requirements set forth in regulations under § 817(h), then the

4
income on such contract is a nonperiodic distribution under what is now § 3405(e)(3).
Thus, the insurance company is subject to certain recordkeeping, reporting, withholding
and deposit obligations under §§ 3402, 3403, 3405, 6047, 6302 and 7501. In addition,
if the company’s failure to meet those obligations is not due to reasonable cause, the
company could be subject to the penalties described in §§ 6651, 6652(e), 6652(h),
6656(a) and 6704.
Section 7121 authorizes the Secretary to enter into closing agreements relating
to the internal revenue tax liability of a person. Rev. Proc. 92-25, 1992-1 C.B. 741,
provides the procedure by which the issuer of a variable contract that fails to satisfy the
requirements of § 817(h) may request the relief described in § 1.817-5(a)(2) of the
regulations. That relief is in the form of a closing agreement pursuant to which the
Internal Revenue Service and the issuer agree to treat the assets of the nondiversified
account as adequately diversified for purposes of § 817(h) for the period or periods of
nondiversification. For periods in which the highest rate specified in § 1 of the Code is
no greater than 31 percent, the amount due from the issuer of a variable annuity
contract under the closing agreement is the sum of–
(1) 20% of income on annuity contracts from which payments have not
been made as of the end of the period; plus
(2) 15% of income on annuity contracts from which payments have been
made as of the end of the period; plus

5
(3) any interest computed under § 6621(a)(2) of the Code as if the
amounts computed under (1) and (2) were underpayments by the contract
holders for their tax year(s) containing the period(s) of nondiversification.
The amount due from the issuer of a variable life insurance or endowment contract is
the sum of–
(1) 28% of the income on the contracts; plus
(2) any interest computed under § 6621(a)(2) of the Code as if the
amounts computed under (1) were underpayments by the contract holders for
their tax year(s) containing the period(s) of nondiversification.
The Service has continued to exercise its authority under § 7121 and
§ 1.817-5(a)(2) to enter into closing agreements using these rates, even though the
highest rate specified in § 1 now is greater than 31 percent. Except as provided below,
it will do so until further notice.
The Service has become aware of situations in which segregated asset accounts
with respect to variable annuity contracts satisfied the special rules of § 817(h)(3) and
§ 1.817-5(b)(3) that apply to accounts underlying variable life insurance contracts, but
did not satisfy the general diversification requirements of § 1.817-5(b)(1) or (2).
SCOPE
This notice applies to any issuer of a variable annuity contract seeking relief
under § 1.817-5(a)(2) of the regulations, if that contract failed to satisfy the
diversification requirements of § 817(h) solely by reason of one or more inadequately

6
diversified segregated asset accounts that would have satisfied the requirements of
§ 817(h)(3) and § 1.817-5(b)(3) if the contract been a variable life insurance contract.
PROCEDURE
An issuer requesting relief under this notice shall request a closing agreement
under the terms and conditions of Rev. Proc. 92-25. In computing the amount due
under the closing agreement, however, the following rates shall be substituted for the
20% and 15% rates provided in § 4.02(1)(A) and (B) of that procedure:
(1) 3.5%, if not more than 75% of the value of the total assets of the
account is represented by Treasury securities for the period or periods of
nondiversification;
(2) 2.5%, if more than 75% but not more than 90% of the value of the total
assets of the account is represented by Treasury securities for the period or
periods of nondiversification; and
(3) 1.5%, if more than 90% of the value of the total assets of the account
is represented by Treasury securities for the period or periods of
nondiversification.
If a contract is based on more than one nondiversified segregated asset
account, the rate shall be determined based on the account with the lowest percentage
investment in Treasury securities. Likewise, if the segregated asset account(s) failed
the requirements of § 1.817-5(b)(1) or (2) for more than one calendar quarter, the rate
for all quarters shall be determined based on the quarter in which the account had the
lowest percentage investment in Treasury securities.

7
EFFECTIVE DATE
This notice is effective January 13, 2000, the date this notice was made available
to the public.
EXPIRATION DATE
This notice applies only to requests for closing agreement relief that are
received on or before August 1, 2000. Requests received after that date must meet
all of the requirements, including the payment amounts, set forth in Rev. Proc. 92-25.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this notice is Gary Geisler of the Office of the Assistant
Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products). For further information regarding
this notice, contact Mr. Geisler on (202) 622-3970 (not a toll-free call).