IRS written determination 201537006

Private letter rulings and published taxpayer determination letters. Native document type is retained separately; a determination letter is not labeled a private letter ruling. These taxpayer-specific releases cannot be used or cited as precedent under 26 USC 6110(k)(3); applicability and current legal force are not independently certified. Keep repeated UILC subjects attached to one actual numbered document.

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201537006
Release Date: 9/11/2015
Index Number: 9100.00-00, 9100.04-00,
168.00-00
---------------------------------------
------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
-------------------------
Third Party Communication: None
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
------------------------, ID No. --------------
Telephone Number:
----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:B05
PLR-103685-15
Date:
June 02, 2015
Taxpayer=---------------------------------------------------------------
State=--------------
Date=-----------------------------
Limited Partnership=------------------------------
Limited Partner =-------------------------------------------------------
Parent 1=-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parent 2=-------------------------------------------
Apartment Complex=-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------
Year=-------
Dear --------------:
This letter is in response to a request for a private letter ruling submitted on your behalf
by your authorized representative. Specifically, you have requested an extension of
time under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration
Regulations for Taxpayer, a tax exempt controlled entity under § 168(h)(6)(F)(iii) of the
Internal Revenue Code, to make an election under § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) to not be treated
as a tax-exempt controlled entity.
FACTS
Taxpayer is a C corporation incorporated under the laws of the State on Date.
Taxpayer was organized as a real estate holding company to hold an investment in
Limited Partnership. Taxpayer owns 0.01% of Limited Partnership. Limited Partner
owns the remaining 99.99% of Limited Partnership. Parent 1 and Parent 2 are non-
stock corporations exempt from taxation under § 501(c)(3). Parent 1 owns 50% of

PLR-103685-15
2
Taxpayer, and Parent 2 owns the remaining 50% of Taxpayer. Accordingly, Taxpayer is
a tax-exempt controlled entity within the meaning of § 168(h)(6)(F)(iii).
Taxpayer is the general partner and the tax matters partner of Limited Partnership.
Limited Partnership was formed to acquire, develop, finance, construct and/or
rehabilitate, own, maintain, operate and sell or otherwise dispose of Apartment
Complex.
Taxpayer and Limited Partner executed a partnership agreement allocating income and
gain between them. In the partnership agreement, Taxpayer and Limited Partner
expressly contracted to make the election under § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) to be treated as a
taxable entity on its federal income tax return for Year in which Apartment Complex was
placed in service.
Taxpayer timely filed its federal income tax return for Year. Although Taxpayer relied on
its tax preparer to make the election as was specified in the partnership agreement, the
tax preparer failed to make the election. Taxpayer at all times intended for the election
to be made on its return for Year and was not aware of the fact that the tax preparer
failed to make the election. Taxpayer became aware of the omission only when it
engaged a new tax preparer.
LAW
Section 167(a) of the Internal Revenue Code provides generally for a depreciation
deduction for property used in a trade or business. Under § 168(g), the alternative
depreciation system must be used for any tax-exempt use property as defined in § 168(h).
Section 168(h)(6)(F)(i) provides generally that any tax-exempt controlled entity is treated as
a tax-exempt entity for purposes of § 168(h)(6). Under § 168(h)(6)(F)(iii)(I), a "tax-exempt
controlled entity" means any corporation (without regard to that subparagraph and
§ 168(h)(2)(E)) if 50 percent or more (in value) of the corporation's stock is held by one or
more tax-exempt entities (other than a foreign person or entity).
Under § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii), a tax-exempt controlled entity can elect not to be treated as a tax-
exempt entity. Such an election is irrevocable and will bind all tax-exempt entities holding an
interest in the tax-exempt controlled entity.
Under § 301.9100-7T(a)(2)(i) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations, a
§ 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election must be made by the due date of the tax return for the first taxable
year for which the election is to be effective. Section 301.9100-7T(a)(3) provides the
manner in which the § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election is made.
Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue has discretion
to grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-

PLR-103685-15
3
1(b) defines the term "regulatory election" as including any election the due date for which is
prescribed by a regulation. Because the due date of the § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election is
prescribed in § 301.9100-7T, the § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election is aregulatory election.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Service will use to
determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. Section
301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for extensions of time for regulatory elections (other
than automatic extensions of time covered in § 301.9100-2) will be granted when the
taxpayer provides evidence (including affidavits) to establish that the taxpayer acted
reasonably and in good faith, and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the
Government.
Section 301.9100-3(b)(1) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and
in good faith if the taxpayer --
(i) requests relief before the failure to make the regulatory election is discoveredby the
Service;
(ii) failed to make the election because of intervening events beyond the taxpayer's control;
(iii) failed to make the election because, after exercising due diligence, the taxpayer was
unaware of the necessity for the election;
(iv) reasonably relied on the written advice of the Service; or
(v) reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, and the tax professional failed to make,
or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.
Under § 301.9100-3(b)(3), a taxpayer is considered to have not acted reasonably and in
good faith if the taxpayer --
(i) seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty could be imposed
under § 6662 at the time the taxpayer requests relief, and the new position requires a
regulatory election for which relief is requested;
(ii) was fully informed of the required election and related tax consequences, but chose not
to file the election; or
(iii) uses hindsight in requesting relief. If specific facts have changed since the original
deadline that make the election advantageous to a taxpayer, the Service will not ordinarily
grant relief.
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) provides that the Service will grant a reasonable extension of time
only when the interests of the Government will not be prejudiced by the granting of relief.
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) provides that the interests of the Government are prejudiced if

PLR-103685-15
4
granting relief would result in a taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the aggregate for all
taxable years affected by the electionthan the taxpayer would have had if the election had
been timely made. Under § 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii), the interests of the Government are
ordinarily prejudiced if the taxable year in which the regulatory election should have been
made, or any taxable yearsaffected by the election had it been timely made, are closed by
the period of limitations on assessment under § 6501(a) before the taxpayer's receipt of a
ruling granting relief under this section.
ANALYSIS
The information submitted indicate that Taxpayer at all times intended from the outset to
make the § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election, and that Taxpayer's failure to make the
§ 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election was inadvertent. Taxpayer represents that it has requested relief
before thefailure to make the § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election was discovered by the Service
pursuant to an examination. There is no evidence that Taxpayer is using hindsight in
requesting relief. Furthermore, based on the facts presented and the representations made,
Taxpayer will not have a lower tax liability for all tax years affected by the § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii)
than it would have had if the § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election had been timely made. We conclude
that Taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith. Therefore, the interests of the
Government will not be prejudiced by the granting of relief.
CONCLUSION
Based solely on the facts as represented and the applicable law, we conclude that the
requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been met, and the request for relief under§ 301.9100-3
is granted. Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time of 60 days from the date
of this letter to file an amended return for Year. Taxpayer must attach the aforementioned
§ 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election and the information set forth in § 301.9100-7T(a)(3) to the
amended return. Taxpayer also must attach a copy of this letter to the amended return. If
Taxpayer files electronically, it may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to the
return that provides the date and control number of this letter ruling.
Pursuant to § 301.9100-7T(a)(3)(ii), a copy of this letter and the § 168(h)(6)(F)(ii) election
statement also should be attached to the federal income tax returns of each of the tax-
exempt shareholders or beneficiaries ofTaxpayer.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax
consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this
letter. Further, we express no opinion concerning the assessment ofany interest, additions
to tax, additional amounts or penalties for failure to file a timely income tax return with
respect to any taxable year.
The ruling in this letter is based upon the information and representations submitted by
Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate

PLR-103685-15
5
party. Although this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the
request for the ruling, it is subject to verification on examination.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it
may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being
sent to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Seoyeon Sharon Park
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 5
(Income Tax & Accounting)