Internal Revenue Bulletin 2006-37 (PDF rendition): IRS Revenue Rulings

Preserve advance releases and the authoritative Internal Revenue Bulletin rendition; directory timestamps are file-publication metadata, not legal effective dates. HTML bulletins begin June 2003; earlier available issues require full PDF parsing. Whole bulletin rendition: numbered items are identified below; other legal material and publisher context remain included. This is not a new standalone advance release.

Bulletin No. 200
6-37
September 11, 20
06
HIGHLIGHTS
OF THIS ISSUE
These synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in
identifying the subject matter covered. They may not be
relied upon as authoritative interpretations.
INCOME TAX
Rev. Rul. 2006–45, page 423.
Mutual life insurance companies; recomputed differen-
tial earnings rate.The recomputed differential earnings rate
for 2004 is determined for use by mutual life insurance com-
panies to compute their income tax liability for 2005.
T.D. 9273,
page 394.
Final regu
lations under section 367 of the Code provide guid-
ance with r
espect to the carryover of certain tax attributes,
such as ear
nings and profits and foreign income tax accounts,
when two c
orporations combine in a foreign-to-foreign or in-
bound cor
porate reorganization or liquidation described in both
section 3
67(b) and section 381.
Announcement 2006–62, page 444.
The 2006 Form 8830,Enhanced Oil Recovery Credit,will not
be issued for the 2007 processing year since the credit is com-
pletely phased out for 2006 due to the increased applicable
reference price of crude oil.
Announcement 2006–63, page 445.
This announcement describes the limited role of private col-
lection agencies (PCAs) in the collection of federal taxes. The
announcement includes descriptions of the legal restrictions
and administrative procedures in place to ensure PCAs respect
taxpayer rights and protections. The announcement also de-
scribes what a taxpayer can expect if the IRS assigns the tax-
payer’s account to a PCA for collection activity.
EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS
Announcement 2006–69, page 449.
The IRS has revoked its determination that Youth Ministries,
Inc., d/b/a Operation Rescue West, of Wichita, KS, no longer
qualifies as an organization described in sections 501(c)(3) and
170(c)(2) of the Code.
EMPLOYMENT TAX
T.D. 9276, page 423.
Final regulations under section 3402 of the Code concern the
definition of supplemental wages for income tax withholding
purposes and income tax withholding requirements for employ-
ers making payments of supplemental wages to employees.
ADMINISTRATIVE
Rev. Proc. 2006–35, page 434.
This revenue procedure announces new user fees that will be
charged by the Service to process Form 8802,Application
for United States Residency Certification. The user fee will
be charged for all Form 8802 applications submitted with a
postmark date on or after October 2, 2006. The rules for
these user fees are set forth and will be incorporated in the
next revision of Form 8802 and accompanying instructions.
(Continued on the next page)
Announcements of Disbarments and Suspensions begin on page 436.
Fi
nding Lists begin on page ii.

Announcement 2006–63, page 445.
This announcement describes the limited role of private col-
lection agencies (PCAs) in the collection of federal taxes. The
announcement includes descriptions of the legal restrictions
and administrative procedures in place to ensure PCAs respect
taxpayer rights and protections. The announcement also de-
scribes what a taxpayer can expect if the IRS assigns the tax-
payer’s account to a PCA for collection activity.
Announcement 2006–64, page 447.
This document contains corrections to proposed regulations
(REG–135866–02, 2006–27 I.R.B. 34) that provide guidance
for determining the earnings and profits attributable to stock
of controlled foreign corporations (or former controlled foreign
corporations) that are (were) involved in certain nonrecognition
transactions.
Announcement 2006–65, page 447.
This document contains additional corrections to proposed reg-
ulations (REG–135866–02, 2006–27 I.R.B. 34) that provide
guidance for determining the earnings and profits attributable
to stock of controlled foreign corporations (or former con-
trolled foreign corporations) that are (were) involved in certain
nonrecognition transactions.
Announcement 2006–66, page 448.
This document contains corrections to final regulations (T.D.
9254, 2006–13 I.R.B. 662) that apply when a member of a
consolidated group transfers subsidiary stock at a loss. They
also apply when a member holds loss shares of subsidiary
stockandthesubsidiaryceasestobeamemberofthegroup.
September 11, 20062006–37 I.R.B.

The IRS Mission
Provide America’s taxpayers top quality service by helping
them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and by
applying the tax law with integrity and fairness to all.
Introduction
The Internal Revenue Bulletin is the authoritative instrument of
the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for announcing official
rulings and procedures of the Internal Revenue Service and for
publishing Treasury Decisions, Executive Orders, Tax Conven-
tions, legislation, court decisions, and other items of general
interest. It is published weekly and may be obtained from the
Superintendent of Documents on a subscription basis. Bulletin
contents are compiled semiannually into Cumulative Bulletins,
which are sold on a single-copy basis.
It is the policy of the Service to publish in the Bulletin all sub-
stantive rulings necessary to promote a uniform application of
the tax laws, including all rulings that supersede, revoke, mod-
ify, or amend any of those previously published in the Bulletin.
All published rulings apply retroactively unless otherwise indi-
cated. Procedures relating solely to matters of internal man-
agement are not published; however, statements of internal
practices and procedures that affect the rights and duties of
taxpayers are published.
Revenue rulings represent the conclusions of the Service on the
application of the law to the pivotal facts stated in the revenue
ruling. In those based on positions taken in rulings to taxpayers
or technical advice to Service field offices, identifying details
and information of a confidential nature are deleted to prevent
unwarranted invasions of privacy and to comply with statutory
requirements.
Rulings and procedures reported in the Bulletin do not have the
force and effect of Treasury Department Regulations, but they
may be used as precedents. Unpublished rulings will not be
relied on, used, or cited as precedents by Service personnel in
the disposition of other cases. In applying published rulings and
procedures, the effect of subsequent legislation, regulations,
court decisions, rulings, and procedures must be considered,
and Service personnel and others concerned are cautioned
against reaching the same conclusions in other cases unless
the facts and circumstances are substantially the same.
The Bulletin is divided into four parts as follows:
Part I.—19
86 Code.
This part i
ncludes rulings and decisions based on provisions of
the Intern
al Revenue Code of 1986.
Part II.—Treaties and Tax Legislation.
This part is divided into two subparts as follows: Subpart A,
Tax Conventions and Other Related Items, and Subpart B, Leg-
islation and Related Committee Reports.
Part III.—Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous.
To the extent practicable, pertinent cross references to these
subjects are contained in the other Parts and Subparts. Also
included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rul-
ings. Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings are issued by
the Department of the Treasury’s Office of the Assistant Sec-
retary (Enforcement).
Part IV
.—Items of General Interest.
This par
t includes notices of proposed rulemakings, disbar-
ment an
d suspension lists, and announcements.
The last Bulletin for each month includes a cumulative index
for the matters published during the preceding months. These
monthly indexes are cumulated on a semiannual basis, and are
published in the last Bulletin of each semiannual period.
The c
ontents of this publication are not copyrighted and may be reprinted freely. A citation of the Internal Revenue Bulletin as the source would be appropriate.
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.
2006–37 I.R.B.September 11, 2006

Place missing child here.
September 11, 20062006–37 I.R.B.

Part I. Rulings and Decisions Under the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986
Section 367.—Foreign
Corporations
26 CFR 1.367(b)–7: Carrryover of earnings and
profits and foreign income taxes in certain for-
eign-to-foreign nonrecognition transactions.
T.D. 9273
DEPARTMENT OF
THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
Stock Transfer Rules:
Carryover of Earnings and
Taxes
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service
(IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
SUMMARY: This document contains fi-
nal regulations addressing the carryover of
certain tax attributes, such as earnings and
profits and foreign income tax accounts,
when two corporations combine in a cor-
porate reorganization or liquidation that is
describedinbothsection367(b)andsec-
tion 381 of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code).
DATES:Effective Date:These regulations
are effective August 8, 2006.
Applicability Date:These regulations
apply to certain section 367(b) exchanges
that occur on or after November 6, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT: Jeffrey L. Parry at (202)
622–3850 (not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Treasury Department and the IRS
issued final regulations §§1.367(b)–1
through 1.367(b)–6,dealing with tax con-
sequences of certain foreign-to-foreign
and inbound corporate transactions, in
June 1998 and January 2000 (the January
2000 final regulations). Thepreambleto
the January 2000 final regulations referred
to proposed regulations that would be is-
sued to address the carryover of certain
corporate tax attributes in transactions in-
volving one or more foreign corporations.
Those proposed regulations were issued on
November 15, 2000, in theFederal Reg-
ister((65 FR 69138) (REG–116050–99,
2000–2 C.B. 520)) (the 2000 proposed
regulations). The public hearing with re-
spect to the 2000 proposed regulations was
cancelled because no request to speak was
received. However, the Treasury Depart-
ment and the IRS received and considered
several written comments, which are dis-
cussed in this preamble.
After consideration of the 2000 pro-
posed regulations and the comments re-
ceived, the Treasury Department and the
IRS adopt substantial portions of those
proposed regulations with significant
modifications as final regulations under
section 367(b).
Overview
A. General Policies of Section 367(b)
In general, section 367 governs corpo-
rate restructurings under sections 332, 351,
354, 355, 356, and 361 (Subchapter C non-
recognition transactions) in which the sta-
tus of a foreign corporation as a “corpo-
ration” is necessary for the application of
the relevant Subchapter C nonrecognition
provisions. Other provisions in Subchap-
ter C (Subchapter C carryover provisions)
apply to such transactions in conjunction
with the enumerated provisions and detail
additional consequences that occur in con-
nection with the transactions. For exam-
ple, sections 362 and 381 govern the carry-
over of basis and earnings and profits from
the transferor corporation to the transferee
corporation in applicable transactions.
The Subchapter C carryover provisions
generally are drafted to apply to domestic
corporations and U.S. shareholders. As a
result, those provisions often do not fully
take into account the relevant cross-border
aspects of U.S. taxation. For example, sec-
tion 381 does not specifically take into ac-
count source and foreign tax credit issues
that arise when earnings and profits move
from one corporation to another.
Congress enacted section 367(b) to
ensure that international tax considera-
tions in the Code are adequately addressed
when the Subchapter C provisions apply
to an exchange involving a foreign cor-
poration. A primary consideration in this
regard is to prevent the avoidance of U.S.
taxation. Because determining the proper
interaction of the Code’s international and
Subchapter C provisions is “necessarily
highly technical,” Congress granted the
Secretary broad regulatory authority to
provide the “necessary or appropriate”
rules rather than enacting a more compre-
hensive statutory regime. H.R. Rep. No.
658, 94th Cong., 1
st
Sess. 241 (1975).
Thus, section 367(b)(2) provides in part
that the regulations “shall include (but
shall not be limited to) regulations * * *
providing * * * the extent to which ad-
justments shall be made to earnings and
profits, basis of stock or securities, and
basis of assets.”
These final regulations address the car-
ryover of foreign earnings and profits and
foreign income taxes in tax-free corporate
asset acquisitions by generally applying
the principles of Subchapter C provisions
such as section 381, which governs the car-
ryover of earnings and profits (and other
tax attributes) in certain tax-free corporate
reorganizations described in section 368
and in corporate liquidations described in
section 332. However, these regulations
(like the 2000 proposed regulations) mod-
ify certain of the mechanics of the Sub-
chapter C rules as necessary or appropri-
ate to ensure that those rules are as consis-
tent as possible with key international tax
policies of the Code and to prevent mate-
rial distortions of income.
These final regulations address the
portions of the 2000 proposed regula-
tions (Prop. Reg.) dealing with inbound
nonrecognition transactions (Prop. Reg.
§1.367(b)–3) and foreign section 381
transactions (Prop. Reg. §1.367(b)–7).
They also address the special rules of
Prop. Reg. §1.367–9. The final regula-
tions, however, do not address the portions
of the 2000 proposed regulations involving
corporate divisions of one or more foreign
corporations (Prop. Reg. §1.367(b)–8).
The Treasury Department and the IRS
2006–37 I.R.B.394September 11, 2006

believe that relevant cross-border tax
consequences of section 355 transactions
should be dealt with in a separate guidance
project.
B. Specific Policies Related to
Inbound Nonrecognition Transactions
(§1.367(b)–3)
Section 1.367(b)–3 addresses acquisi-
tions by a domestic corporation (domes-
tic acquiring corporation) of the assets of a
foreign corporation (foreign acquired cor-
poration) in a section 332 liquidation or
an asset acquisition described in section
368(a)(1), such as an A, C, D, or F reor-
ganization (inbound nonrecognition trans-
action). Regulations applying section 367
and section 368 to cross-border A reorga-
nizations were recently issued. See T.D.
9242, 2006–7 I.R.B. 422.
As a general policy matter, the impor-
tation of various tax attributes in inbound
transactions is carefully scrutinized. In
fact, inbound importation issues have been
the subject of recent legislative reforms
(see section 362(e)). The policy relating
to importation of tax attributes also has
been reflected in prior section 367 reg-
ulations. For example, the preamble to
the January 2000 final regulations gener-
ally describes international policy issues
that can arise in inbound nonrecognition
transactions. The preamble states that the
“principal policy consideration of section
367(b) with respect to inbound nonrecog-
nition transactions is the appropriate carry-
over of attributes from foreign to domes-
tic corporations. This consideration has
interrelated shareholder-level and corpo-
rate-level components.” The January 2000
final regulations clarify that a domestic ac-
quiring corporation succeeds to those for-
eign taxes paid or accrued by a foreign
target corporation only to the extent those
taxes are eligible for credit under section
906.
The preamble to the January 2000 fi-
nal regulations also notes that it would be
consistent with the policy considerations
of section 367(b) for future regulations to
provide additional rules with respect to the
extent to which attributes carry over from
a foreign corporationtoaU.S.corpora-
tion. Accordingly, the 2000 proposed reg-
ulations provided rules concerning several
attributes, specifically net operating loss
and capital loss carryovers, and earnings
and profits that are not included in income
as an all earnings and profits amount (or a
deficit in earnings and profits). The 2000
proposed regulations generally provided
that these tax attributes carry over from a
foreign acquired corporation to a domes-
tic acquiring corporation only to the extent
that they are effectively connected with a
U.S. trade or business (or attributable to a
permanent establishment, in the case of an
applicable U.S. income tax treaty). These
final regulations adopt the rules set forth in
the 2000 proposed regulations.
C. Specific Policies Related to Foreign
Section 381 Transactions (§1.367(b)–7)
Section 1.367(b)–7 applies to an acqui-
sition by a foreign corporation (foreign ac-
quiring corporation) of the assets of an-
other foreign corporation (foreign target
corporation) in a transaction described in
section 381 (foreign section 381 transac-
tion) and addresses the manner in which
earnings and profits and foreign income
taxes of the foreign acquiring corporation
and foreign target corporation carry over to
the surviving foreign corporation (foreign
surviving corporation). These rules apply,
for example, to A, C, D, or F reorganiza-
tions or section 332 liquidations between
two foreign corporations.
The principal Code sections implicated
by the carryover of earnings and prof-
its and foreign income taxes in a foreign
section 381 transaction are sections 381,
902, 904, and 959. Section 381 generally
permits earnings and profits (or deficit in
earnings and profits) to carry over to a
surviving corporation, thus enabling “the
successorcorporationtostepintothe‘tax
shoes’ of its predecessor. * * * [and] rep-
resents the economic integration of two
or more separate businesses into a unified
business enterprise.” H. Rep. No. 1337,
83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. 41 (1954). How-
ever, a deficit in earnings and profits of
either the transferee or transferor corpo-
ration can only be used to offset earnings
and profits accumulated after the date of
transfer. Section 381(c)(2)(B). This is
commonly known as the “hovering deficit
rule”. The hovering deficit rule is a leg-
islative mechanism designed to deter the
trafficking in favorable tax attributes that
the IRS and courts had repeatedly encoun-
tered. See, for example,Commissioner
v. Phipps, 336 U.S. 410 (1949). These
final regulations generally adopt the prin-
ciples of section 381 in the cross-border
context, but adapt the operation of those
rules in consideration of the international
provisions, such as sections 902, 904, and
959, that address foreign corporations’
earnings and profits and their related for-
eign income taxes. Thus, for example,
these final regulations apply the section
381 earnings and profits combination and
deficit rules by reference to the separate
categories of income described in section
904(d) and elsewhere (baskets) that are
used to compute foreign tax credit limita-
tions.
Section 902 generally provides that a
deemed paid foreign tax credit is available
to a domestic corporation that receives
a dividend from a foreign corporation
in which it owns 10 percent or more of
the voting stock. The Code computes
deemed-paid taxes with regard to divi-
dends from a relevant foreign corpora-
tion by looking first to the multi-year
pools of earnings and profits accumulated
(and related foreign income taxes paid or
deemed paid) in taxable years beginning
after December 31, 1986, or beginning
with the first year in which a domestic
corporation owns 10 percent or more of
the voting stock of the foreign corpora-
tion, whichever is later. Section 902(c).
(The Code and regulations refer to pooled
earnings and profits and foreign income
taxes as post-1986 undistributed earnings
and post-1986 foreign income taxes even
though a particular corporation may not
begin to maintain multi-year pools until
after 1986. Sections 902(c)(1) and (2),
§1.902–1(a)(8) and (9).)
Congress enacted the pooling rules be-
cause it believed that blending foreign in-
come taxes and earnings and profits into
“pools” from which distributions are made
was fairer and more appropriate than com-
puting deemed-paid taxes with reference
to annual layers of earnings and profits
(and foreign income taxes). Joint Commit-
tee on Taxation, 99
th
Cong., 2
nd
sess., Gen-
eral Explanation of the Tax Reform Act
of 1986 (JCS–10–87) (1986 Bluebook), at
870 (May 4, 1987). Averaging foreign in-
come taxes through these blended pools
prevents taxpayers from inflating their for-
eign subsidiary’s effective tax rate for a
particular year in order to obtain artifi-
cially enhanced foreign tax credits.Id.Av-
eraging also prevents the loss of credits for
September 11, 20063952006–37 I.R.B.

foreign income taxes that are trapped in
years in which a foreign subsidiary has no
earnings and profits for U.S. tax purposes.
Id.
However, Congress enacted pooling on
a limited basis. Earnings and profits accu-
mulated (and related foreign income taxes
paid or deemed paid) in taxable years
before the first year a foreign corpora-
tion qualifies as a pooling corporation and
pre-1987 earnings and profits accumulated
(and related foreign income taxes paid or
deemed paid) by a pooling corporation are
not subject to the pooling rules. Rather,
such earnings and profits (and related
foreign income taxes) are maintained in
separate annual layers. Section 902(c)(6).
The Code and regulations refer to earnings
and profits and foreign income taxes in
annual layers as pre-1987 accumulated
profits and pre-1987 foreign income taxes
even though a particular corporation may
have annual layers for years after 1986
(because of the absence of the requisite
domestic corporate shareholder). Section
902(c)(6); §1.902–1(a)(10).
A distribution of earnings and profits
is treated as first out of pooled earnings
and profits and then, only after all pooled
earnings and profits have been distributed,
out of annual layers of earnings and prof-
itsonaLIFObasis. Section902(a)and
(c). The retention of annual layers beneath
pooled earnings and profits limits the need
to recreate tax histories, an administrative
burden that is more significant for peri-
ods during which a corporation had lim-
ited nexus to the U.S. taxing jurisdiction
and for pre-1987 earnings and profits when
pooling was not required.
The foreign tax credit limitation en-
sures that taxpayers can use foreign tax
credits only to offset U.S. tax on foreign
source income. The limitation is com-
puted separately with respect to different
baskets of income derived from different
types of activities. (From 1987 through
2006, section 904 provides for eight dif-
ferent baskets of income; for tax years
beginning after December 31, 2006, all
but two section 904(d) baskets of income
are eliminated. Separate baskets described
in other Code sections such as sections
56(g)(4)(C)(iii)(IV), 245(a)(10), 865(h),
901(j), and 904(g)(10) will continue in
effect after 2006. The American Jobs Cre-
ation Act of 2004, Public Law 108–357,
118 Stat. 1418 (AJCA), section 404(a).)
The purpose of the baskets is to limit
taxpayers’ ability to cross-credit taxes im-
posed with respect to different categories
of income. Congress was concerned that,
without separate limitations, cross-credit-
ing opportunities would distort economic
incentives as to whether to invest in the
United States or abroad. 1986 Bluebook
at 862.
Another international provision impli-
cated by the movement of earnings and
profits in foreign section 381 transactions
is section 959. Section 959 governs the
distribution of earnings and profits that
represent income that has been previously
taxed to U.S. shareholders under section
951(a) (PTI). After studying the interac-
tion of section 367(b) and the PTI rules,
the Treasury Department and the IRS de-
termined that more guidance under section
959 would be useful before issuing regu-
lations to address PTI issues that arise un-
der section 367(b). Accordingly, the Trea-
sury Department and the IRS have opened
a separate regulations project under sec-
tion 959 and expect to issue regulations
that address PTI issues under section 959
in the future. Because this project is still
ongoing, these final regulations reserve on
section 367(b) issues related to PTI. Guid-
ance in this area will come in a separate
project.
Summary of Comments Received and
Changes Made
A. Inbound Nonrecognition Transactions
A comment was received regarding the
provision under the 2000 proposed regu-
lations that limits the carryover of earn-
ings and profits (or deficit in earnings and
profits) from a foreign corporation to a
domestic corporation in an inbound non-
recognition transaction to those earnings
and profits that are effectively connected
with the conduct of a trade or business
within the United States (or are attribut-
able to a permanent establishment in the
United States, in the context of an appli-
cable U.S. income tax treaty). The com-
ment suggests that there are better ways
to avoid the two most significant prob-
lems of importing foreign earnings into do-
mestic corporate solution: potential divi-
dends-received deductions on subsequent
distribution of the previously untaxed for-
eign earnings, and taxing distributions of
previously taxed earnings and profits de-
scribed in section 959. The comment goes
on to state that, in particular, eliminat-
ing deficits but taxing positive earnings on
an inbound nonrecognition transaction by
way of the all earnings and profits inclu-
sion under §1.367(b)–3 is inappropriate.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
have considered this comment. While the
comment identifies asymmetries in the tax
treatment of inbound reorganizations, on
balance the Treasury Department and the
IRS believe that the 2000 proposed regula-
tions reached the appropriate result. As in-
dicated above, the importation of favorable
tax attributes has been subject to greater
scrutiny in recent years. See, for exam-
ple, section 362(e). In that context, it is
not appropriate to provide for the carry-
over of deficits or of earnings and profits
in excess of the all earnings and profits in-
clusion. This conclusion also has the bene-
fit of administrative ease for taxpayers and
the IRS. Accordingly, these final regula-
tions do not modify the rules regarding in-
bound nonrecognition transactions as set
forth in the 2000 proposed regulations, ex-
cept to reserve on the treatment of PTI for
further consideration.
B. Paradigm Based on Pooling rather
than Look-through
The structure of the 2000 proposed reg-
ulations was based in large part on the cate-
gorization of foreign acquiring, target, and
surviving corporations as look-through
corporations, non-look-through corpo-
rations, or less-than-10%-U.S.-owned
foreign corporations. Under the interna-
tional provisions of the Code in effect
at the time the 2000 proposed regula-
tions were published, a look-through
corporation included a controlled for-
eign corporation as defined in section
957 (CFC) or a noncontrolled section
902 corporation as defined in section
904(d)(2)(E) after 2003 (a look-through
10/50 corporation), the effective date of
section 1105(b) of Public Law 105–34
(111 Stat. 788) (the 1997 Act). A
non-look-through corporation was a non-
controlled section 902 corporation before
2003 (non-look-through 10/50 corpora-
tion) and a less-than-10%-U.S.-owned
foreign corporation was a foreign corpo-
ration that was neither a CFC nor a 10/50
corporation.
2006–37 I.R.B.396September 11, 2006

The pools of earnings and profits and
foreign taxes associated with these three
categories of corporations were referred
to as the look-through pool, the non-look-
through pool, and the pre-pooling annual
layers, respectively. A number of statu-
tory and regulatory changes that have oc-
curred since the time the 2000 proposed
regulations were published, however, have
necessitated appropriate changes (and sim-
plification) in the organizational paradigm
for these final regulations.
At the time the 2000 proposed regu-
lations were issued (and continuing prior
to the AJCA), the treatment of dividends
from a 10/50 corporation paid after 2002
varied according to the year in which the
earnings and profits from which the div-
idend was paid were accumulated. The
look-through approach applied to divi-
dends paid out of earnings and profits ac-
cumulated after 2002, whereas dividends
paid out of earnings and profits accumu-
lated prior to 2003 were subject to a single
separate limitation for dividends from all
10/50 corporations. Joint Committee on
Taxation, 105
th
Cong., 1
st
sess., General
Explanation of Tax Legislation enacted in
1997 (JCS–23–97), at 303 (December 17,
1997). The AJCA conference report indi-
cates that Congress changed the treatment
of dividends from 10/50 corporations for
purposes of simplification. H.R. Rep. No.
108–548, pt. 1 at 192 (2004).
In 2004, Congress amended the Code
(the 2004 amendment) to provide that any
dividend paid by a noncontrolled section
902 corporation (10/50 corporation), as de-
fined in section 904(d)(2)(E), to a 10 per-
cent or greater U.S. corporate shareholder
is treated as income in a basket based on
the ratio of the earnings and profits attrib-
utable to income in such basket to the for-
eign corporation’s total earnings and prof-
its (the “look-through” approach). AJCA,
section 403. The 2004 amendment was ef-
fective retroactively,for taxable years be-
ginning after December 31, 2002. Section
403(l) of the Gulf Opportunity Zone Act
of 2005, Public Law 109–135 (119 Stat.
2577), permitted taxpayers to elect to defer
the effective date of the 2004 amendment
to taxable years beginning after December
31, 2004.
Also, as part of the 2004 amendment,
dividends paid to 10% domestic corpo-
rate shareholders of a CFC are eligible for
look-through treatment, even if they are
paid out of earnings that were accumulated
while the corporation was not a CFC. Sec-
tion 904(d)(4); see also §1.904–7T(f)(3)
and (6). Prior to the effective date of the
2004 amendment, dividends paid out of
such earnings were subject to a separate
limitation. See 26 CFR 1.904–4(g)(2)(ii)
(revised as of April 1, 2006).
As a result of the 2004 amendment, the
termsnon-look-through 10/50 corporation
and the relatednon-look-through poolas
defined in the 2000 proposed regulations
have become obsolete and therefore have
been eliminated in these final regulations.
More generally, in light of the broader
availability of look-through treatment to
earnings paid out of pre-pooling annual
layers, the Treasury Department and the
IRS believe that a paradigm centered on
look-through or non-look-through status is
less relevant. Accordingly, the organiza-
tion of these final regulations is based on
the categorization of foreign acquiring, tar-
get, and surviving corporations as pool-
ing or nonpooling corporations. The rel-
evant pools of earnings and profits and as-
sociated foreign taxes are referred to as
post-1986 pools and pre-pooling annual
layers. Qualifying shareholders are eli-
gible for look-through treatment on divi-
dends out of post-1986 pools and pre-pool-
ing annual layers to the extent provided in
section 904(d)(3) and (4).
C. Hovering Deficits and Section 316
Comments were received regarding
the application under the 2000 proposed
regulations of the hovering deficit rules
on a “basket-by-basket” basis. Under the
2000 proposed regulations, a pre-trans-
action deficit in a particular basket is
generally subject to the hovering deficit
rule of section 381. As a result, that deficit
is not taken into account in determining
the current or accumulated earnings and
profits of the surviving corporation for
any purpose, including for purposes of
determining dividends under section 316
and for determining foreign tax credits
under section 902. However, any such
pre-transaction deficits in earnings and
profits may be used to offset a foreign
surviving corporation’s accumulated (but
not current) post-transaction earnings and
profits in the same basket as the deficit.
Several comments noted that, in certain
circumstances, this rule can give rise to
hovering deficits from one (or both) of the
merging corporations even if it (or they)
had aggregate positive earnings and prof-
its immediately prior to the section 381
transaction. In addition, if one (or both) of
the merging corporations’ pre-transaction
earnings consist both of positive earnings
in one basket and a deficit in another bas-
ket, the earnings and profits of that corpo-
ration available to support a dividend un-
der section 316 will increase solely as a re-
sult of entering into the section 381 trans-
action. This is because the hovering deficit
will no longer offset the positive earnings
in the other basket for purposes of section
316. As a result, even if a corporation has
an aggregate deficit in earnings and prof-
its, any positive baskets of earnings will be
able to support the distribution of a divi-
dend immediately after the transaction.
The comments contend that the prohi-
bition described above against the use of
an earnings and profits deficit in one bas-
ket from offsetting positive earnings and
profits in another basket can produce re-
sults that are inconsistent with the result
of applying a pure section 381(c)(2)(B) ap-
proach in determining the amount of a dis-
tribution that is a “dividend” under sec-
tion 316, and more generally are incon-
sistent with the principles and legislative
history of the section 381(c)(2)(B) hover-
ing deficit rule, which was adopted to pre-
serve, but not create, the taxation of dis-
tributions by corporations that engage in
tax-free reorganizations or liquidations.
To address these concerns, the com-
ments requested that (among other things)
the proposed regulations be modified
to conform to the principles contained
in Notice 88–71, 1988–2 C.B. 374, and
§1.960–1(i)(4), which pro-rate an earnings
and profits deficit in one basket against
positive earnings and profits in other bas-
kets for purposes of computing post-1986
undistributed earnings under section 902.
It was also requested that the rules under
§1.960–1(i)(4) should be modified for pur-
poses of the hovering deficit rules to elim-
inate the “springing” effect of an earnings
and profits deficit. Section 1.960–1(i)(4)
provides that a deficit in any basket does
not permanently reduce earnings in other
baskets, but after the deemed-paid taxes
are computed, the deficit reverts to and
is carried forward in the same basket in
which it was incurred. It was asserted in
the comments that once a hovering deficit
September 11, 20063972006–37 I.R.B.

is used to reduce earnings in another bas-
ket, it should not revert to its original
basket in a subsequent taxable year be-
cause this deficit reincarnation results in
unnecessary complexity in the calculation
of earnings and profits.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
have carefully considered these com-
ments. After this consideration, they have
concluded that the arguments in these
comments ultimately are not persuasive.
The purpose of the hovering deficit rule
in the domestic context is to prevent traf-
ficking in deficits in earnings and profits.
Absent this rule, a corporation with posi-
tive earnings and profits could acquire or
be acquired by another corporation with a
deficit in earnings and profits and imme-
diately reduce the amount of its positive
earnings and profits, thereby reducing the
amount of potentially taxable distribu-
tions.
In transactions involving foreign cor-
porations, similar concerns exist regard-
ing the possibility of trafficking in deficits
in earnings and profits. In light of the
foreign tax credit rules, unique tax ben-
efits may arise from combining positive
and deficit earnings and profits of differ-
ent foreign corporations. In a reorganiza-
tion involving two domestic corporations,
the hovering deficit rule applies to a cor-
poration with a net accumulated deficit in
earnings and profits because the relevant
statutory rules do not distinguish among
classes of earnings and profits. In contrast,
the foreign tax credit rules require catego-
rization of earnings and profits according
to the pooling and basket rules. Because of
these distinctions, taxpayers may inappro-
priately benefit by trafficking in an earn-
ings and profits deficit in a basket, pool,
or particular annual layer, even though a
corporation may have net positive earnings
and profits. The Treasury Department and
the IRS believe that these issues merit tar-
geted differences in the application of the
hovering deficit rule in this context. Ac-
cordingly, these final regulations retain the
provisions of the 2000 proposed regula-
tions that apply the hovering deficit rule on
a basket-by-basket basis.
The final regulations also include a
clarification that post-transaction earnings
andprofitsthatmaybeoffsetbyhover-
ing deficits do not include earnings and
profits that are distributed or deemed dis-
tributed in the same taxable year that they
are earned. That is, the hovering deficit
rule does not permit deficits to be off-
set against post-transaction earnings and
profits until those earnings and profits be-
come accumulated (as opposed to current)
for tax purposes. This rule is consistent
with a similar provision in the hovering
deficit regulations under section 381. See
§1.381(c)(2)–1(a)(5).
D. Hovering Deficits and Section 902
Under section 902, the amount of for-
eign taxes that are deemed paid by a 10%
domestic corporate shareholder receiving
dividends from a foreign corporation is
equal to the foreign corporation’s post-
1986 foreign income taxes multiplied by
a fraction, the numerator of which is the
amount of the dividend, and the denomi-
nator of which is the foreign corporation’s
post-1986 undistributed earnings. Post-
1986 undistributed earnings include both
accumulated and current year earnings and
deficits, not taking into account current
year distributions. The section 902 calcu-
lation is done on a basket-by-basket ba-
sis. The 2000 proposed regulations pro-
vide that a pre-transaction deficit will only
be taken into account for purposes of de-
termining the accumulated earnings and
profits of the surviving corporation in the
section 902 denominator to the extent of
post-transaction earnings that are accumu-
lated in the same basket as the deficit.
A comment was made requesting that
the hovering deficit rule not apply for pur-
poses of computing deemed-paid credits
under section 902, particularly in the de-
termination of accumulated earnings and
profits in the denominator of the section
902 fraction. Under this approach, the ef-
fect of the inclusion of an otherwise hov-
ering deficit on the section 902 calcula-
tion could be beneficial or detrimental to
the taxpayer, depending on the particular
taxpayer’s facts. For example, the sug-
gested approach would be detrimental to
taxpayers if the unrestricted use of the oth-
erwise hovering deficit reduced the de-
nominator of the section 902 fraction to or
below zero. See §1.902–1(b)(4) (provid-
ing that no taxes are deemed paid with re-
spect to a “nimble dividend” if post-1986
undistributed earnings are zero or less than
zero). The rationale offered for this request
is that it would more properly follow the
intent of Congress when it amended sec-
tion 902 in 1986 to average earnings and
profits and foreign taxes under a pooling
method.
After consideration of the comment, the
Treasury Department and the IRS have
concluded that it would not be appropriate
to allow a pre-transaction hovering deficit
from one corporation to offset pre-trans-
action earnings and profits of another cor-
poration for purposes of determining the
denominator of the section 902 fraction.
Such an offset could increase the ratio of
foreign taxes to earnings and profits in the
pool and thereby in certain cases could
“supercharge” the amount of foreign taxes
that could be drawn out by a given distri-
bution. The Treasury Department and the
IRS believe this is not an appropriate re-
sult and could encourage taxpayers to en-
ter into section 381 transactions to take ad-
vantage of the distortion that would result
from accelerating foreign tax credits in cer-
tain cases. It is also possible that such
a rule could be detrimental to taxpayers
by otherwise denying them access to cred-
itable foreign income taxes if their section
902 denominator were eliminated. More-
over, the comment would further compli-
cate an already complex area by mandating
one set of hovering deficit treatment and
calculations of earnings for section 316
and another for section 902.
An alternative request was made to the
effect that, if the hovering deficit rule is
retained, it should be modified to allow a
pre-transaction earnings and profits deficit
to offset the surviving corporation’s post-
transaction current year earnings and prof-
its for purposes of determining the section
902 denominator, irrespective of whether
such earnings are distributed during the
taxable year.
After considering this comment, the
Treasury Department and the IRS con-
cluded that on balance it would not be
appropriate to modify the proposed reg-
ulations in this manner. In many cases,
allowing the hovering deficit to offset cur-
rent year distributed earnings and profits
for purposes of the section 902 denom-
inator would effectively allow an offset
of pre-transaction earnings and profits.
This is because the opening balance of
post-1986 undistributed earnings in the
year following the distribution would be
reduced a second time (the first reduction
having occurred as a result of offsetting
the current year distributed earnings and
2006–37 I.R.B.398September 11, 2006

profits by the hovering deficit) as re-
quired by section 902 and the regulations
thereunder to account for the distribution
itself. This second reduction would re-
duce pre-transaction earnings and profits
or, to the extent of any excess over that
amount, create a deficit in accumulated
earnings and profits. As described, the
Treasury Department and the IRS believe
that in order to minimize credit traffick-
ing problems, pre-transaction deficits of
one corporation should not be allowed to
offset pre-transaction earnings of another
corporation.
Additionally, implementing the modi-
fication requested in the comment would
create administrative burdens for taxpay-
ers and the IRS. If hovering deficits off-
set current year distributed earnings solely
for purposes of section 902 but not for pur-
poses of section 316, dual accounts would
be necessary to track hovering deficits as
they are separately used under each sec-
tion.
Moreover, certain taxpayers would be
disadvantaged under the requested mod-
ification as compared to how those tax-
payers would be treated under the rule
adopted in these final regulations. For ex-
ample, if a foreign subsidiary has a hov-
ering deficit in a separate basket that ex-
ceeds the sum of current plus accumulated
earnings in the basket and the foreign sub-
sidiary distributes current year post-trans-
action earnings in that same basket, under
the requested modification, the hovering
deficit would reduce the section 902 de-
nominator to zero, with the result that no
deemed-paid taxes could be claimed on the
distribution. In fact, for this reason certain
taxpayers have specifically requested that
the hovering deficit rule apply for purposes
of the section 902 fraction. Under the rules
adopted by the final regulations, the hov-
ering deficit would not reduce the section
902 denominator and therefore taxpayers
would have access to deemed-paid taxes
on the distribution.
E. Hovering Taxes
Under the 2000 proposed regulations,
taxes associated with a hovering deficit do
not enter into the surviving corporation’s
post-1986 foreign income taxes pool un-
til the entire deficit has been offset against
post-transaction accumulated earnings and
profits. Comments were made request-
ing that the regulations be changed to pro-
vide that foreign taxes related to a hover-
ing deficit enter the post-1986 foreign in-
come taxes pool on apro ratabasis as the
hovering deficit to which the foreign taxes
relate is used to offset post-transaction ac-
cumulated earnings and profits. The Trea-
sury Department and IRS agree that apro
rataapproach of this nature more accu-
rately ties the availability of the foreign in-
come taxes with the use of the related hov-
ering deficit. Accordingly, this requested
change is reflected in the final regulations.
F. Zipping Rule
The 2000 regulations provide that
if the foreign target corporation or for-
eign acquiring corporation (or both)
was a look-through corporation and
the foreign surviving corporation is a
less-than-10%-U.S.-owned foreign corpo-
ration, the post-1986 pools of earnings and
profits of the look-through corporation in
the separate baskets are recharacterized
as a single, non-look-through pre-pooling
annual layer which accumulated imme-
diately prior to the 381 transaction (the
zipping rule). In addition, the 2000 pro-
posed regulations provide that if the for-
eign surviving corporation later changes
to look-through status, any such recharac-
terized earnings and profits do not regain
either their pooling or their look-through
character.
A comment was made that in a case
where the foreign surviving corporation
subsequently changes to look-through
status, if the recharacterized earn-
ings and profits do not revert to their
look-through character, a dividend paid
out of those earnings would not be af-
forded look-through treatment. The com-
ment argued that this would run counter
to section 904(d)(2)(E)(i) which provides
that look-through treatment applies to dis-
tributions by a CFC out of any earnings
and profits accumulated during periods in
which it was a CFC.
The Treasury Department and IRS
note that this concern has been addressed
by intervening statutory and regula-
tory changes. All distributions from a
look-through corporation now receive
look-through treatment, regardless of
whether they are paid out of earnings and
profits from post-1986 pools or pre-pool-
ing annual layers. As a result, the concern
raised in the comment is now effectively
moot, and look-through treatment gener-
ally prevails. The final regulations oth-
erwise retain the zipping rule, however,
because with respect to the maintenance
of pools or annual layers, this rule pro-
vides administrative advantages for both
taxpayers and the IRS by not requiring
subsequent U.S. shareholders of a foreign
surviving corporation that continued to ac-
cumulate earnings on an annual layer basis
to recreate post-1986 pools of pre-trans-
action earnings and profits carried over
from a pooling foreign target corporation.
Accordingly, the Treasury Department
and the IRS decided to retain the general
zipping rule provisions of the 2000 pro-
posed regulations in these final regulations
for pooling purposes, while allowing full
preservation of look-through treatment.
Moreover, it should be noted that these
final regulations define a pooling corpora-
tion as one that has at any time met the
requirements of section 902(c)(3)(B). Ac-
cordingly, even if the foreign surviving
corporation does notmeet those require-
ments immediately after the foreign sec-
tion 381 transaction, it will still be a pool-
ing corporation if it had met those require-
ments at any time prior to the transaction.
See §1.902–1(a)(13)(i).
G. Qualified and Chain Deficit Rules
Under Section 952(c)(1)(B) and (C)
The section 952(c)(1)(B) subpart
F qualified deficit rule and section
952(c)(1)(C) subpart F chain deficit rule
allow the use of a CFC’s deficit in earn-
ings and profits to limit subpart F income
inclusions for another year with respect
to the stock of the same CFC or for the
same year with respect to stock of another
CFC in certain cases. Under the quali-
fied deficit rule of section 952(c)(1)(B), a
prior-year earnings and profits deficit may
be used to limit a qualified shareholder’s
current year subpart F income in the same
CFC if such deficit is attributable to the
same qualified activity as the activity that
gives rise to the current year subpart F
income. Under the chain deficit rule of
section 952(c)(1)(C), a current year earn-
ings and profits deficit may be used to
limit a related corporation’s current year
subpart F income subject to the same qual-
ified activity restrictions.
September 11, 20063992006–37 I.R.B.

The 2000 proposed regulations provide
that a pre-transaction deficit is not taken
into account for purposes of calculating the
earnings and profits limitation under the
chain deficit rule. The 2000 proposed reg-
ulations are silent, however, as to the qual-
ified deficit rule. A comment was made
requesting that pre-transaction deficits be
taken into account for purposes of calcu-
lating the earnings and profits limitations
under both the qualified deficit rules and
the chain deficit rules.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
agree with this comment. The qualified
deficit rule does not limit the amount of
the subpart F income at the CFC level,
but rather limits the amount of a particular
shareholder’s subpart F income inclusion
under section 951(a). Because qualified
deficits in earnings and profits are share-
holder-level attributesand anti-trafficking
provisions are already incorporated in the
rules regarding qualified deficits under
section 952(c)(1)(B), the Treasury Depart-
ment and the IRS believe that it is appro-
priate to allow pre-transaction deficits to
be taken into account for purposes of the
calculation of qualified deficits. Though
the Treasury Department and IRS believe
this was already a reasonable position that
could have been taken under the 2000
proposed regulations, the final regulations
include a more explicit clarification of this
position.
The final regulations also provide that
a current year pre-transaction deficit may
be taken into account for purposes of lim-
iting subpart F income under the chain
deficit rule. The Treasury Department and
the IRS believe that the narrow restric-
tions that apply to application of the chain
deficit rule are not subject to manipulation
through entering into foreign section 381
transactions. Accordingly there is no pol-
icy reason for denying a qualified chain
member access to a pre-transaction deficit
that otherwise qualifies as a chain deficit
solely because the CFC with the chain
deficit engaged in a foreign section 381
transaction during the taxable year. Any
such pre-transaction deficit that qualifies
as a chain deficit will nonetheless remain
a hovering deficit of the surviving corpo-
ration for purposes of section 316 and sec-
tion 902.
H. Allocation of Earnings and Profits,
Deficits, and Taxes During the Transaction
Year
The 2000 proposed regulations include
a rule that allocates the earnings and prof-
its for the taxable year of a foreign surviv-
ing corporation in which a foreign section
381 transaction occurs as either pre-trans-
action earnings or post-transaction earn-
ings on the basis of the number of days
in the taxable year before and after the
date of the foreign section 381 transaction.
This rule parallels a similar rule found
under §1.381(c)(2)–1(a)(6) and is neces-
sary in order to determine the amount of
post-transaction earnings that may be off-
set by hovering deficits. This rule is ap-
plied on a basket-by-basket basis for any
basket in which there are positive earnings
and profits for the taxable year in which the
transaction occurred. No comments were
received on this point, and the final regu-
lations adopt this provision, extending it to
related foreign income taxes as well.
These final regulations also contain a
rule for allocating deficits, and related for-
eign income taxes, for the taxable year in
which a foreign section 381 transaction oc-
curs as pre- and post-transaction deficits.
If the surviving corporation has a deficit in
any basket for the taxable year in which the
transaction occurred, unless the actual ac-
cumulated earnings and profits, or deficit,
as of the date of the transaction can be
shown, the deficit shall be allocated in the
samepro ratamanner described above for
positive earnings and profits. This rule
also parallels a similar rule found under
§1.381(c)(2)–1(a)(6) and is necessary in
order to determine the amount of pre-trans-
action deficits that will hover. This rule
is applied on a basket-by-basket basis for
any basket in which there is a deficit in
earnings and profits for the taxable year in
which the transaction occurred.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
believe that the addition of the allocation
rule for deficits provides greater consis-
tency with the principles and rules of sec-
tion 381. It is a neutral provision and
is consistent with appropriate results that
could be reached under present law.
I. Special Rule for F Reorganizations and
Similar Transactions
The 2000 proposed regulations (Prop.
Reg. §1.367(b)–9) provide that the hover-
ing deficit rules do not apply in the case
of a foreign section 381 transaction that
is described in section 368(a)(1)(F) or in
which either the foreign target corpora-
tion or the foreign acquiring corporation
is newly created. This rule was intended
to prevent inappropriate tax consequences
that could result from application of the
hovering deficit rules to the combination
of two corporations where only one of
those corporations has meaningful tax at-
tributes. For example, under the gener-
ally applicable hovering deficit rules, a for-
eign corporation with significant deficits
in earnings and profits could combine with
a newly created foreign corporation and
thereafter distribute dividends (along with
deemed paid foreign income taxes under
section 902), despite the presence of a sig-
nificant deficit that would have precluded
a dividend distribution before the transac-
tion.
The rule under the 2000 proposed reg-
ulations addressing newly created corpo-
rations was meant to capture any trans-
actions that are functionally equivalent to
F reorganizations. However, the Trea-
sury Department and the IRS have deter-
mined that the newly-created corporation
standard under the 2000 proposed regula-
tions is both potentially underinclusive and
overinclusive in scope. It is underinclusive
in that it would not apply to include foreign
section 381 transactions that do not other-
wise qualify as an F reorganization but that
are between one foreign corporation with
meaningful tax attributes and a shell cor-
poration that is not newly created, but nev-
ertheless has no meaningful tax attributes.
In contrast, this standard is overinclusive
in that it might be read to include a foreign
section 381 transaction involving multiple
foreign corporations with meaningful tax
attributes as long as at least one party to the
transaction is a newly created corporation.
These transactions are neither F reorgani-
zations nor are they functionally equiva-
lent to F reorganizations.
Accordingly, these final regulations
clarify the 2000 proposed regulations by
providing that the hovering deficit rules do
not apply to a foreign section 381 transac-
tion involving at least one corporation that
2006–37 I.R.B.400September 11, 2006

does not own more than a nominal amount
of property or does not have more than a
nominal amount of tax attributes, but no
more than one corporation that does own
more than a nominal amount of property
or have more than a nominal amount of
tax attributes. In most cases the transac-
tions covered by this special rule will be
standard F reorganizations.
J. Anti-abuse Rule
The 2000 proposed regulations include
an anti-abuse rule that gives the Commis-
sioner the discretion to turn off the hov-
ering deficit rules if a principal purpose
of a foreign section 381 transaction is to
gain a tax benefit from affirmative use of
those rules. Comments have criticized the
anti-abuse rule as overly broad and incon-
sistent with establishing objective rules re-
garding the taxation of earnings distributed
(or deemed distributed) by foreign sub-
sidiaries. Moreover, the point was raised
in some comments that the proposed anti-
abuse rule would prevent taxpayers from
relying on the existing detailed set of rules
for the calculation of earnings and profits
following a corporate combination in any
case in which a taxpayer receives a U.S.
tax benefit related to the application of the
hovering deficit rule.
Upon consideration of these comments,
the Treasury Department and the IRS have
concluded that the anti-abuse rule in the
2000 proposed regulations should be elim-
inated. While the anti-abuse rule has been
eliminated, the IRS will continue to ex-
amine the application of the regulations to
transactions to which they apply, or po-
tentially apply, and will be prepared to
pursue issues where appropriate under the
regulations and other established princi-
ples of existing law. The Treasury Depart-
ment and the IRS may revisit the rules in
light of experience and propose prospec-
tive changes as appropriate.
K. Miscellaneous
A number of conforming revisions have
been made to the 2000 proposed regula-
tions to account for relevant statutory and
regulatory changes discussed above that
have occurred in the intervening time pe-
riod since the 2000 proposed regulations
were issued. This includes the reduction
of the number of baskets under section
904(d)(1), applicablefor tax years begin-
ning after December 31, 2006, as well as
the fact that distributions by look-through
corporations out of annual layers accumu-
lated during a non-look-through period are
now accorded look-through treatment.
It is possible that special transition rules
might be needed relating to the effect on
hovering deficits in existence on the effec-
tive date of the reduction in the number of
baskets under section 904(d)(1). If it is
determined that such rules are necessary,
they would be provided as part of a broader
guidance project currently under consider-
ation to address generally transition issues
relating to the reduction in baskets.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this Trea-
sury decision is not a significant regula-
tory action as defined in Executive Order
12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment
is not required. It also has been deter-
mined that section 553(b) of the Admin-
istrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter
5) does not apply to these regulations, and
because the regulations do not impose a
collection of information on small entities,
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to sec-
tion 7805(f) of the Code, the notice of pro-
posed rulemaking preceding these regula-
tions was submitted to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business Ad-
ministration for comment on their impact
on small business.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these final reg-
ulationsisJeffreyL.ParryoftheOfficeof
Chief Counsel (International). However,
other personnel from the Treasury Depart-
ment and the IRS participated in their de-
velopment.
*****
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended
as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for
part 1 is amended by revising the entries
for §§1.367(b)–7 and 1.367(b)–9 to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.367(b)–7 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 367(a) and (b), 26 U.S.C. 902, and
26 U.S.C. 904.
Section 1.367(b)–9 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 367(a) and (b), 26 U.S.C. 902, and
26 U.S.C. 904. * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.367(b)–0 is amended
by:
1. Revising the introductory text.
2. Adding entries for §1.367(b)–2(l).
3. Adding entries for §1.367(b)–3(e)
and (f).
4. Adding entries for §§1.367(b)–7
through 1.367(b)–9.
The revisions and additions read as fol-
lows:
§1.367(b)–0 Table of contents.
This section lists the paragraphs
contained in §§1.367(b)–1 through
1.367(b)–9.
*****
§1.367(b)–2 Definitions and special rules.
*****
(l) Additional definitions.
(1) Foreign income taxes.
(2) Post-1986 undistributed earnings.
(3) Post-1986 foreign income taxes.
(4) Pre-1987 accumulated profits.
(5) Pre-1987 foreign income taxes.
(6) Pre-1987 section 960 earnings and
profits.
(7) Pre-1987 section 960 foreign in-
come taxes.
(8) Earnings and profits.
(9) Pooling corporation.
(10) Nonpooling corporation.
(11) Separate category.
(12) Passive category.
(13) General category.
§1.367(b)–3 Repatriation of foreign
corporate assets in certain nonrecognition
transactions.
*****
(e) Net operating loss and capital loss
carryovers.
(f) Carryover of earnings and profits.
(1) General rule
(2) Previously taxed earnings and prof-
its. [Reserved]
*****
§1.367(b)–7 Carryover of earnings
and profits and foreign income taxes in
September 11, 20064012006–37 I.R.B.

certain foreign-to-foreign nonrecognition
transactions.
(a) Scope.
(b) General rules.
(1) Non-previously taxed earnings and
profits and related taxes.
(2) Previously taxed earnings and prof-
its. [Reserved]
(c) Ordering rule for post-transaction
distributions.
(1) If foreign surviving corporation is a
pooling corporation.
(2) If foreign surviving corporation is a
nonpooling corporation.
(d) Post-1986 pool.
(1) In general.
(i) Qualifying earnings and taxes.
(ii) Carryover rule.
(2) Hovering deficit.
(i) In general.
(ii) Offset rule.
(iii) Related taxes.
(3) Examples.
(e) Pre-pooling annual layers.
(1) If foreign surviving corporation is a
pooling corporation.
(i) Qualifying earnings and taxes.
(ii) Carryover rule.
(iii) Deficits.
(A) In general.
(B) Aggregate positive pre-1987 accu-
mulated profits.
(C) Aggregate deficit in pre-1987 accu-
mulated profits.
(D) Deficit and positive separate cate-
gories within annual layers.
(iv) Pre-1987 section 960 earnings and
profits and foreign income taxes.
(v) Examples.
(2) If foreign surviving corporation is a
nonpooling corporation.
(i) Qualifying earnings and taxes.
(ii) Carryover rule.
(iii) Deficits.
(A) In general.
(B) Aggregate positive pre-1987 accu-
mulated profits.
(C) Aggregate deficit in pre-1987 accu-
mulated profits.
(D) Deficit and positive separate cate-
gories within annual layers.
(iv) Pre-1987 section 960 earnings and
profits and foreign income taxes.
(v) Examples.
(f) Special rules.
(1) Treatment of deficit.
(i) General rule.
(ii) Exceptions.
(iii) Examples.
(2) Reconciling taxable years.
(3) Post-transaction change of status.
(4) Ordering rule for multiple hovering
deficits.
(i) Rule.
(ii) Example.
(5)Pro ratarule for earnings and
deficits during transaction year.
(g) Effective date.
§1.367(b)–8 Allocation of earnings and
profits and foreign income taxes in certain
foreign corporate separations.[Reserved]
§1.367(b)–9 Special rule for F
reorganizations and similar transactions.
(a) Scope.
(b) Hovering deficit rules inapplicable.
(c) Foreign divisive transactions. [Re-
served]
(d) Examples.
(e) Effective date.
Par. 3. Section 1.367(b)–1 is amended
by:
1. Removing the language “and” at the
end of paragraph (c)(2)(iii).
2. Removing the period at the end of
paragraph (c)(2)(iv)(B) and adding “; and”
in its place.
3. Adding paragraph (c)(2)(v).
4. Revising paragraphs (c)(3)(ii)(A),
(c)(4)(iv), and (c)(4)(v).
The additions and revisions read as fol-
lows:
§1.367(b)–1 Other transfers.
*****
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(v) A foreign surviving corporation de-
scribed in §1.367(b)–7(a).
(3) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) United States shareholders (as de-
fined in §1.367(b)–3(b)(2)) of foreign cor-
porations described in paragraph (c)(2)(i)
or (v) of this section; and
*****
(4) * * *
(iv) A statement that describes any
amount (or amounts) required, under the
section 367(b) regulations, to be taken
into account as income or loss or as an
adjustment (including an adjustment un-
der §1.367(b)–7 or 1.367(b)–9) to basis,
earnings and profits, or other tax attributes
as a result of the exchange;
(v) Any information that is or would be
required to be furnished with a Federal in-
come tax return pursuant to regulations un-
der section 332, 351, 354, 355, 356, 361,
368, or 381 (whether or not a Federal in-
cometaxreturnisrequiredtobefiled),if
such information hasnot otherwise been
provided by the person filing the section
367(b) notice;
*****
Par. 4. Section 1.367(b)–2 is amended
by:
1. Revising paragraph (j)(1)(i).
2. Adding paragraph (l).
The revision and addition read as fol-
lows:
§1.367(b)–2 Definitions and special rules.
*****
(j)Sections 985 through 989—(1)
Change in functional currency of a quali-
fied business unit—(i)Rule. If, as a result
of a section 367(b) exchange described
in section 381(a), a qualified business
unit (as defined in section 989(a)) (QBU)
has a different functional currency deter-
mined under the rules of section 985(b)
than it used prior to the transaction, then
the QBU shall be deemed to have auto-
matically changed its functional currency
immediately prior to the transaction. A
QBU that is deemed to change its func-
tional currency pursuant to this paragraph
(j) must make the adjustments described
in §1.985–5.
*****
(l)Additional definitions—(1)For-
eign income taxes.Thetermforeign
income taxeshas the meaning set forth in
§1.902–1(a)(7).
(2)
Post-1986 undistributed earn-
ings.Thetermpost-1986 undistributed
earningshas the meaning set forth in
§1.902–1(a)(9).
(3)Post-1986 foreign income taxes.
The termpost-1986 foreign income
taxeshas the meaning set forth in
§1.902–1(a)(8).
(4)Pre-1987 accumulated profits.
The termpre-1987 accumulated prof-
itsmeans the earnings and profits de-
scribed in §1.902–1(a)(10)(i), com-
puted in accordance with the rules of
§1.902–1(a)(10)(ii).
2006–37 I.R.B.402September 11, 2006

(5)Pre-1987 foreign income taxes.The
termpre-1987 foreign income taxeshas the
meaning set forth in §1.902–1(a)(10)(iii).
(6)Pre-1987 section 960 earnings
and profits.Thetermpre-1987 section
960 earnings and profitsmeans the earn-
ings and profits of a foreign corporation
accumulated in taxable years beginning
before January 1, 1987, computed under
§1.964–1(a) through (e), and translated
into the functional currency (as deter-
mined under section 985) of the foreign
corporation at the spot rate on the first
day of the foreign corporation’s first tax-
able year beginning after December 31,
1986. For further guidance, see Notice
88–70, 1988–2 C.B. 369, 370 (see also
§601.601(d)(2) of this chapter). The term
pre-1987 section 960 earnings and profits
does not include earnings and profits that
represent previously taxed earnings and
profits described in section 959.
(7)Pre-1987 section 960 foreign in-
come taxes.Thetermpre-1987 section
960 foreign income taxesmeans the for-
eign income taxes related to pre-1987
section 960 earnings and profits, deter-
mined in accordance with the principles of
§1.902–1(a)(10)(iii), except that the U.S.
dollar amounts of pre-1987 section 960
foreign income taxes are determined by
reference to the exchange rates in effect
when the taxes were paid or accrued.
(8)Earnings and profits.Theterm
earnings and profitsmeans post-1986
undistributed earnings, pre-1987 accumu-
lated profits, and pre-1987 section 960
earnings and profits.
(9)Pooling corporation.Theterm
pooling corporationmeans a foreign cor-
poration with respect to which the require-
ments of section 902(c)(3)(B) have been
met in the current taxable year or any prior
taxable year.
(10)Nonpooling corporation.Theterm
nonpooling corporationmeans a foreign
corporation that is not a pooling corpora-
tion.
(11)Separate category.Thetermsep-
arate categoryhas the meaning set forth
in section 904(d)(1), and shall also in-
clude any other category of income to
which section 904(a), (b), and (c) are
applied separately under any other provi-
sion of the Internal Revenue Code (e.g.,
sections 56(g)(4)(C)(iii)(IV), 245(a)(10),
865(h), 901(j), and 904(h)(10) (or section
904(g)(10) for taxable years beginning on
or before December 31, 2006)).
(12)Passive category.Thetermpas-
sive categorymeans the separate category
that includes income described in section
904(d)(1)(A).
(13)General category.Thetermgen-
eral categorymeans the separate category
that includes income described in section
904(d)(1)(B) (or section 904(d)(1)(I) for
taxable years beginning on or before De-
cember 31, 2006).
Par. 5. Section 1.367(b)–3 is amended
by adding paragraphs (e) and (f) to read as
follows:
§1.367(b)–3 Repatriation of foreign
corporate assets in certain nonrecognition
transactions.
*****
(e)Net operating loss and capital loss
carryovers. A net operating loss or capital
loss carryover of the foreign acquired cor-
poration is described in section 381(c)(1)
and (c)(3) and thus is eligible to carry over
from the foreign acquired corporation to
the domestic acquiring corporation only
to the extent the underlying deductions or
losses were allowable under chapter 1 of
subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code.
Thus, only a net operating loss or capi-
tal loss carryover that is effectively con-
nected with the conduct of a trade or busi-
ness within the United States (or that is at-
tributable to a permanent establishment, in
the context of an applicable United States
income tax treaty) is eligible to be carried
over under section 381. For further guid-
ance, see Rev. Rul. 72–421, 1972–2 C.B.
166 (see also §601.601(d)(2) of this chap-
ter).
(f)Carryover of earnings and prof-
its—(1)General rule. Except to the extent
otherwise specifically provided (see,e.g.,
Notice 89–79, 1989–2 C.B. 392 (see also
§601.601(d)(2) of this chapter)), earnings
and profits of the foreign acquired cor-
poration that are not included in income
as a deemed dividend under the section
367(b) regulations (or deficit in earnings
and profits) are eligible to carry over
from the foreign acquired corporation to
the domestic acquiring corporation under
section 381(c)(2) only to the extent such
earnings and profits (or deficit in earnings
and profits) are effectively connected with
the conduct of a trade or business within
the United States (or are attributable to
a permanent establishment in the United
States, in the context of an applicable
United States income tax treaty). All other
earnings and profits (or deficit in earnings
and profits) of the foreign acquired corpo-
ration shall not carry over to the domestic
acquiring corporation and,asaresult,shall
be eliminated.
(2)Previously taxed earnings and prof-
its.[Reserved]
*****
Par. 6. In §1.367(b)–6, paragraph
(a)(1) is revised to read as follows:
§1.367(b)–6 Effective dates and
coordination rules.
(a)Effective date—(1)In general. Sec-
tions 1.367(b)–1 through 1.367(b)–3, and
this section, apply to section 367(b) ex-
changes that occur on or after November
6, 2006. For guidance with respect to sec-
tion 367(b) exchanges that occur prior to
November 6, 2006, see §§1.367(b)–1
through 1.367(b)–6 in effect prior to
November 6, 2006 (see 26 CFR part 1
revised as of April 1, 2006).
Par. 7. Section1.367(b)–7isaddedto
read as follows:
§1.367(b)–7 Carryover of earnings
and profits and foreign income taxes in
certain foreign-to-foreign nonrecognition
transactions.
(a)Scope. This section applies to an
acquisition by a foreign corporation (for-
eign acquiring corporation) of the assets
of another foreign corporation (foreign tar-
get corporation) in a transaction described
in section 381 (foreign section 381 trans-
action). This section describes the man-
ner and extent to which earnings and prof-
its and foreign income taxes of the foreign
acquiring corporation and the foreign tar-
get corporation carry over to the surviv-
ing foreign corporation (foreign surviving
corporation) and the ordering of distribu-
tions by the foreign surviving corporation.
See §1.367(b)–9 for special rules govern-
ing reorganizations described in section
368(a)(1)(F) and foreign section 381 trans-
actions involving foreign corporations that
hold no property and have no tax attributes
immediately before the transaction, other
than a nominal amount of assets (and re-
lated tax attributes).
September 11, 20064032006–37 I.R.B.

(b)General rules—(1)Non-previously
taxed earnings and profits and related
taxes. Earnings and profits and related
foreign income taxes of the foreign ac-
quiring corporation and the foreign tar-
get corporation (pre-transaction earnings
and pre-transaction taxes, respectively)
shall carry over to the foreign surviving
corporation in themanner described in
paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) of this sec-
tion. Dividend distributions by the foreign
surviving corporation (post-transaction
distributions) shall be out of earnings and
profits and shall reduce related foreign
income taxes in the manner described in
paragraph (c) of this section.
(2)Previously taxed earnings and prof-
its.[Reserved]
(c)Ordering rule for post-transaction
distributions. Dividend distributions out
of a foreign surviving corporation’s earn-
ings and profits shall be ordered in accor-
dance with the rules of paragraph (c)(1) or
(2) of this section, depending on whether
the foreign surviving corporation is a pool-
ing corporation or a nonpooling corpora-
tion.
(1)If foreign surviving corporation is a
pooling corporation. In the case of a for-
eign surviving corporation that is a pool-
ing corporation, post-transaction distribu-
tions shall be first out of the post-1986
pool (as described in paragraph (d) of this
section) and second out of the pre-pool-
ing annual layers (as described in para-
graph (e)(1) of this section) under an an-
nual last-in, first-out (LIFO) method.
(2)If foreign surviving corporation is
a nonpooling corporation. In the case
of a foreign surviving corporation that
is a nonpooling corporation, post-trans-
action distributions shall be out of the
pre-pooling annual layers (as described in
paragraph (e)(2) of this section) under the
LIFO method.
(d)Post-1986 pool. If the foreign sur-
viving corporation is a pooling corpora-
tion, then the post-1986 pool shall be de-
termined under the rules of this paragraph
(d).
(1)In general—(i)Qualifying earnings
and taxes. The post-1986 pool shall con-
sist of the post-1986 undistributed earn-
ings and related post-1986 foreign income
taxes of the foreign acquiring corporation
and the foreign target corporation.
(ii)Carryover rule. Subject to para-
graph (d)(2) of this section, the amounts
described in paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this sec-
tion attributable to the foreign acquiring
corporation and the foreign target corpora-
tion shall carry over to the foreign surviv-
ing corporation and shall be combined on
a separate category-by-separate category
basis.
(2)Hovering deficit—(i)In general.
If immediately prior to the foreign sec-
tion 381 transaction either the foreign
acquiring corporation or the foreign target
corporation has a deficit in one or more
separate categories of post-1986 undis-
tributed earnings or an aggregate deficit
in pre-1987 accumulated profits, such
deficit will be a hovering deficit of the
foreign surviving corporation. The rules
of this paragraph (d)(2) apply to hovering
deficits in separate categories of post-1986
undistributed earnings. See paragraphs
(e)(1)(iii) and (e)(2)(iii) of this section
for rules that apply to hovering deficits in
pre-1987 accumulated profits. If the for-
eign acquiring corporation and the foreign
target corporationeach have a post-1986
hovering deficit in the same separate cate-
gory of post-1986 undistributed earnings,
such deficits and their related post-1986
foreign income taxes shall be combined
for purposes of applying this paragraph
(d)(2). See also paragraphs (f)(1) and
(4) of this section (describing other rules
applicable to a deficit described in this
paragraph (d)(2)).
(ii)Offset rule. A hovering deficit in
a separate category of post-1986 undis-
tributed earnings shall offset only earn-
ings and profits accumulated by the for-
eign surviving corporation after the for-
eign section 381 transaction (post-transac-
tion earnings) in the same separate cate-
gory of post-1986 undistributed earnings.
For purposes of this rule, however, post-
transaction earnings do not include post-
1986 undistributed earnings in the same
category that are earned after the foreign
section 381 transaction, but are distributed
or deemed distributed in the same year
they are earned (that is, that do not become
accumulated). The offset shall occur as of
the first day of the foreign surviving cor-
poration’s first taxable year following the
year in which the post-transaction earnings
accumulated.
(iii)Related taxes. Post-1986 foreign
income taxes that are related to a hovering
deficit in a separate category of post-1986
undistributed earnings shall only be added
to the foreign surviving corporation’s post-
1986 foreign income taxes in that separate
category on apro ratabasis as the hov-
ering deficit is absorbed.Pro ratameans
in the same proportion as the portion of
the hovering deficit that offsets post-trans-
action earnings in the separate category
under paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this section
bears to the total amount of the hovering
deficit.
(3)Examples. The following exam-
ples illustrate the rules of this paragraph
(d). The examples assume the following
facts: foreign corporations A and B are
controlled foreign corporations (CFCs)
that were incorporated after December
31, 1986, have always been pooling cor-
porations, and have always had calendar
taxable years. None of the sharehold-
ers of foreign corporations A and B are
requiredtoincludeanyamountinin-
come under §1.367(b)–4 as a result of
the foreign section 381 transaction. For-
eign corporations A and B (and all of
their respective qualified business units
as defined in section 989) maintain a “u”
functional currency. Finally, unless other-
wise stated, any post-1986 undistributed
earnings in the passive category resulted
from a look-through dividend that was
paid by a lower-tier CFC out of earnings
accumulated when the CFC was a noncon-
trolled section 902 corporation and that
qualified for the subpart F same-country
exception under section 954(c)(3)(A). The
examples are as follows:
Example 1.(i)Facts. (A) On December 31,
2006, foreign corporations A and B have the follow-
ing post-1986 undistributed earnings and post-1986
foreign income taxes:
2006–37 I.R.B.404September 11, 2006

ForeignCorporationA
SeparateCategoryE&PForeignTaxes
General300u
$60
Passive100u
$40
400u
$100
F
oreignCorporationB
SeparateCategoryE&PForeignTaxes
General300u
$70
(B) On January 1, 2007, foreign corporation B ac-
quires the assets of foreign corporation A in a reorga-
nization described in section 368(a)(1)(C). Immedi-
ately following the foreign section 381 transaction,
foreign surviving corporation is a CFC.
(ii)Result. Under the rules described in paragraph
(d)(1) of this section, foreign surviving corporation
has the following post-1986 undistributed earnings
and post-1986 foreign income taxes:
S
eparateCategoryE&PForeignTaxes
General600u
$130
Passive100u
$40
700u
$170
(iii)Post-transaction distribution.(A)Dur-
ing 2007, foreign surviving corporation does not
accumulate any earnings and profits or pay or ac-
crue any foreign income taxes. On December 31,
2007, foreign surviving corporation distributes 350u
to its shareholders. Under the rules described in
§1.902–1(d)(1) and paragraph (c)(1) of this section,
the distribution is out of, and reduces, post-1986
undistributed earnings and post-1986 foreign income
taxes in the separate categories on apro ratabasis,
as follows:
S
eparateCategoryE&PForeignTaxes
General300u
$65
Passive
50u
$20
350u
$85
(B) The foreign income taxes deemed paid by
qualifying shareholders of foreign surviving corpo-
ration upon the distribution are subject to generally
applicable rules and limitations, such as those of sec-
tions 78, 902, and 904(d).
(C) Immediately after the distribution, foreign
surviving corporation has the following post-1986
undistributed earnings and post-1986 foreign income
taxes:
S
eparateCategoryE&PForeignTaxes
General300u
$65
Passive
50u
$20
350u
$85
Example 2.(i)Facts. (A) On December 31,
2006, foreign corporations A and B have the follow-
ing post-1986 undistributed earnings and post-1986
foreign income taxes:
F
oreignCorporationA
SeparateCategoryE&PForeignTaxes
General200u
$30
Passive(100u)
$10
100u
$40
F
oreignCorporationB
SeparateCategoryE&PForeignTaxes
General300u
$60
Passive100u
$30
400u
$90
(B) On January 1, 2007, foreign corporation B ac-
quires the assets of foreign corporation A in a reorga-
nization described in section 368(a)(1)(C). Immedi-
ately following the foreign section 381 transaction,
foreign surviving corporation is a CFC.
(ii)Result. Under the rules described in para-
graphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section, foreign sur-
viving corporation has the following post-1986
undistributed earnings and post-1986 foreign income
taxes:
September 11, 20064052006–37 I.R.B.

Earnings&Profits:ForeignTaxes:
SeparateCategory
Positive
E
&PHoveringDeficit
Foreign
Taxes
A
vailable
Foreign Taxes
Associated
with
Hovering
D
eficit
General
500u
$90
Passive100u(100u)
$30$10
600u(100u)
$120$10
(iii)Post-transaction distribution.(A)Dur-
ing 2007, foreign surviving corporation does not
accumulate any earnings and profits or pay or ac-
crue any foreign income taxes. On December 31,
2007, foreign surviving corporation distributes 300u
to its shareholders. Under the rules described in
§1.902–1(d)(1) and paragraph (c)(1) of this section,
the distribution is out of, and reduces, post-1986
undistributed earnings and post-1986 foreign income
taxes on apro ratabasisasfollows:
S
eparateCategoryE&PForeignTaxes
General
250u
$45
Passive
50u
$15
300u
$60
(B) The foreign income taxes deemed paid by
qualifying shareholders of foreign surviving corpo-
ration upon the distribution are subject to generally
applicable rules and limitations, such as those of sec-
tions 78, 902, and 904(d).
(C) Immediately after the distribution, foreign
surviving corporation has the following post-1986
undistributed earnings and post-1986 foreign income
taxes:
E
arnings&Profits:ForeignTaxes:
SeparateCategory
Positive
E
&PHoveringDeficit
Foreign
Taxes
A
vailable
Foreign Taxes
Associated
with
Hovering
D
eficit
General
250u
$45
Passive
50u
(100u)
$15$10
300u(100u)
$60$10
(iv)Post-transaction earnings—(A) In its taxable
year ending on December 31, 2008, foreign surviv-
ing corporation accumulates earnings and profits and
pays related foreign income taxes as follows:
S
eparateCategoryE&PForeignTaxes
General100u
$20
Passive
50u
$10
150u
$40
(B) None of foreign surviving corporation’s earn-
ings and profits for its 2008 taxable year qualifies as
subpart F income as defined in section 952(a). Under
the rules described in paragraphs (d)(2)(ii) and (iii) of
this section, the hovering deficit in the passive cate-
gory will offset the post-transaction earnings in that
category and a proportionate amount of the foreign
taxes related to the hovering deficit will be added to
the post-1986 foreign income taxes pool. Because the
post-transaction earnings in the passive category are
half of the amount of the hovering deficit, half of the
related taxes are added to the post-1986 foreign in-
come taxes pool. Accordingly, foreign surviving cor-
poration has the following post-1986 undistributed
earnings and post-1986 foreign income taxes on Jan-
uary 1, 2009:
E
arnings&Profits:ForeignTaxes:
SeparateCategory
Positive
E
&PHoveringDeficit
Foreign
Taxes
A
vailable
Foreign Taxes
Associated
with
Hovering
D
eficit
General
350u
$65
Passive
50u(50u)
$30$5
400u
(50u)
$95$5
2006–37 I.R.B.406September 11, 2006

Example 3.(i)Facts. The facts are the same as
Example 2, except that the 50u of earnings in the pas-
sive category accrued by foreign surviving corpora-
tion during 2008 is subpart F income, all of which is
included in income under section 951(a) by United
States shareholders (as defined in section 951(b)).
This example assumes that none of the United States
shareholders are able to reduce their subpart F in-
come inclusion with a qualified deficit under section
952(c)(1)(B).
(ii)Result. (A) Under the rule described in
paragraph (f)(1) of this section, the (100u) hovering
deficit in the passive category does not reduce foreign
surviving corporation’s current passive earnings and
profits for purposes of determining subpart F income
or associated deemed paid credits. Thus, foreign
surviving corporation’s United States shareholders
include theirpro ratashares of 50u in taxable income
for the year and are eligible for a deemed paid foreign
tax credit under section 960, computed by reference
to theirpro ratashares of $12.50 (50u subpart F
inclusion / (50u + 50u post-1986 undistributed earn-
ings in the passive category = 100u) = 50%, x $25
post-1986 foreign income taxes in the passive cate-
gory = $12.50). The United States shareholders will
also include theirpro ratashares of the deemed-paid
taxes of $12.50 in taxable income for the year as a
deemed dividend pursuant to section 78.
(B) Immediately after the subpart F inclusion
and section 960 deemed paidtaxes (and taking into
account the taxable year 2008 earnings and profits
and related taxes in the general category), foreign
surviving corporation has the following post-1986
undistributed earnings and post-1986 foreign income
taxes:
E
arnings&Profits:ForeignTaxes:
SeparateCategory
Positive
E
&PHoveringDeficit
Foreign
Taxes
A
vailable
Foreign Taxes
Associated
with
Hovering
D
eficit
General
350u
$65.00
Passive
50u
(100u)
$12.50$10
400u(100u)
$77.50$10
(C) The 50u included as subpart F income con-
stitutes previously taxed earnings and profits under
section 959.
Example 4.(i)Facts. (A) On December 31,
2006, foreign corporations A and B have the follow-
ing post-1986 undistributed earnings and post-1986
foreign income taxes:
F
oreignCorporationA
SeparateCategoryE&PForeignTaxes
General
50u
$10
F
oreignCorporationB
SeparateCategoryE&PForeignTaxes
General(100u)
$20
(B) On January 1, 2007, foreign corporation B ac-
quires the assets of foreign corporation A in a reorga-
nization described in section 368(a)(1)(C). Immedi-
ately following the foreign section 381 transaction,
foreign surviving corporation is a CFC.
(ii)Result. Under the rules described in para-
graphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section, foreign sur-
viving corporation has the following post-1986
undistributed earnings and post-1986 foreign income
taxes:
E
arnings&Profits:ForeignTaxes:
SeparateCategory
Positive
E
&PHoveringDeficit
Foreign
Taxes
A
vailable
Foreign Taxes
Associated
with
Hovering
D
eficit
General
50u
(100u)
$10$20
(iii)Post-transaction earnings and distribution.
(A) In its taxable year ending on December 31, 2007,
foreign surviving corporation earns 100u in the gen-
eral category and pays related foreign income taxes of
$24. On December 31, 2007, foreign surviving cor-
poration distributes 75u to its shareholders.
(B)Result. For purposes of determining the div-
idend amount under section 316 and the foreign in-
come taxes deemed paid with respect to that divi-
dend under section 902, under paragraph (d)(2)(ii)
of this section the hovering deficit does not offset
the post-transaction current year earnings. Accord-
ingly, the full 75u will be a dividend under section
316. The deemed paid taxes on that dividend are $17
(75u distribution / (100u current earnings + 50u ac-
cumulated earnings) = 50%, x ($10 accumulated for-
eign taxes + $24 current year foreign taxes) = $17).
The 25u of undistributed earnings and profits in 2007
will be offset by (25u) of the hovering deficit for
purposes of determining the opening balance of the
post-1986 undistributed earnings pool in 2008. Be-
cause the amount of earnings offset by the hovering
deficit is 25% of the amount of the hovering deficit,
under paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section $5 (25% of
$20) of the related taxes are added to the post-1986
foreign income taxes pool at the beginning of the next
taxable year. Accordingly, foreign surviving corpora-
tion has the following post-1986 undistributed earn-
ings and post-1986 foreign income taxes on January
1, 2008:
September 11, 20064072006–37 I.R.B.

Earnings&Profits:ForeignTaxes:
SeparateCategory
Positive
E
&PHoveringDeficit
Foreign
Taxes
A
vailable
Foreign Taxes
Associated
with
Hovering
D
eficit
General
50u(75u)
$22$15
(e)Pre-pooling annual layers—(1)If
foreign surviving corporation is a pool-
ing corporation. If the foreign surviving
corporation is a pooling corporation, the
pre-pooling annual layers shall be deter-
mined under the rules of this paragraph
(e)(1).
(i)Qualifying earnings and taxes.The
pre-pooling annual layers shall consist of
the pre-1987 accumulated profits and the
pre-1987 foreign income taxes of the for-
eign acquiring corporation and the foreign
target corporation.
(ii)Carryover rule. Subject to para-
graph (e)(1)(iii) of this section, the
amounts described in paragraph (e)(1)(i)
of this section shall carry over to the for-
eign surviving corporation but shall not
be combined. If the foreign acquiring
corporation and the foreign target corpo-
ration have pre-1987accumulated profits
in the same year and a distribution is made
therefrom, the rules of §1.902–1(b)(2)(ii)
and (b)(3) shall apply separately to re-
duce pre-1987 accumulated profits and
pre-1987 foreign income taxes of the for-
eign acquiring corporation and the foreign
target corporation on apro ratabasis. For
further guidance, see Rev. Rul. 68–351,
1968–2 C.B. 307; Rev. Rul. 70–373,
1970–2 C.B. 152 (see also §601.601(d)(2)
of this chapter); see also paragraph (f)(2)
of this section (governing the reconcilia-
tion of taxable years).
(iii)Deficit—(A)In general.Therules
of this paragraph (e)(1)(iii) apply when,
immediately prior to the foreign section
381 transaction, the foreign acquiring cor-
poration or the foreign target corporation
(or both) has a deficit in earnings and
profits for one or more of the years that
comprise its pre-1987 accumulated profits
(see also paragraphs (f)(1) and (4) of this
section, describing other rules applicable
to a deficit described in this paragraph
(e)(1)(iii)).
(B)Aggregate positive pre-1987 accu-
mulated profits. If the foreign acquiring
corporation or the foreign target corpora-
tion (or both) has an aggregate positive
(or zero) amount of pre-1987 accumulated
profits, but a deficit in earnings and profits
for one or more years, then the rules oth-
erwise applicable to such deficits shall ap-
ply separately to the pre-1987 accumulated
profits and related pre-1987 foreign in-
come taxes of such corporation. A deficit
in pre-1987 accumulated profits for one or
more years is applied to reduce pre-1987
accumulated profits on a LIFO basis. Any
remaining deficit shall be applied to reduce
pre-1987 accumulated profits in succeed-
ing years. See Rev. Rul. 74–550, 1974–2
C.B. 209 (see also §601.601(d)(2) of this
chapter);Champion Int’l Corp. v. Com-
missioner, 81 T.C. 424 (1983), acq. in re-
sult, 1987–2 C.B. 1; Rev. Rul. 87–72,
1987–2 C.B. 170 (see also §601.601(d)(2)
of this chapter). As a result, no amount in
excess of the aggregatepositiveamountof
pre-1987 accumulated profits shall be dis-
tributed from the pre-transaction earnings
of the foreign acquiring corporation or the
foreign target corporation.
(C)Aggregate deficit in pre-1987 ac-
cumulated profits. If the foreign acquiring
corporation or the foreign target corpo-
ration (or both) has an aggregate deficit
in pre-1987 accumulated profits, a hov-
ering deficit as defined under paragraph
(d)(2)(i) of this section, then the rules un-
der §1.902–2(b) shall apply to such hov-
ering deficit (and related pre-1987 foreign
income taxes) immediately prior to the
transaction, except that the aggregate hov-
ering deficit that is carried forward into the
foreign surviving corporation’s post-1986
pool shall offset only post-transaction
earnings accumulated by the foreign sur-
viving corporation in the same separate
category of post-1986 undistributed earn-
ings to which the relevant portion of the
hovering deficit is attributable. Post-trans-
action earnings do not include earnings
and profits that are earned after the foreign
section 381 transaction but distributed or
deemed distributed in the same year they
are earned.
(D)Deficit and positive separate cat-
egories within annual layers.Forpur-
poses of applying the rules of paragraphs
(e)(1)(iii)(B) and (C) of this section, if
within a single pre-pooling annual layer,
the foreign acquiring corporation or the
foreign target corporation (or both) has
a deficit in pre-1987 accumulated profits
in a separate category and positive pre-
1987 accumulated profits in another sepa-
rate category, the deficit shall first be used
to offset the positive pre-1987 accumu-
lated profits in the other separate category
in the same pre-pooling annual layer. Any
remaining deficit shall be carried forward
or back to other years according to the
rules of paragraph (e)(1)(iii)(B) or (C) of
this section as applicable.
(iv)Pre-1987 section 960 earnings and
profits and foreign income taxes. The pre-
1987 section 960 earnings and profits and
pre-1987 section 960 foreign income taxes
of the foreign acquiring corporation and
the foreign target corporation shall carry
over to the foreign surviving corporation
but shall not be combined. The rules other-
wise applicable to such amounts shall ap-
ply separately to the pre-1987 section 960
earnings and profits and pre-1987 section
960 foreign income taxes of the foreign ac-
quiring corporation and the foreign target
corporation on apro ratabasis. For fur-
ther guidance, see Notice 88–70, 1988–2
C.B. 369 (see also §601.601(d)(2) of this
chapter).
(v)Examples. The following exam-
ples illustrate the rules of this paragraph
(e)(1). The examples assume the follow-
ing facts: foreign corporation A was in-
corporated in 2003 and was a nonpooling
corporation through December 31, 2004.
Foreign corporation A became a CFC on
January 1, 2005 and, as a result, began to
maintain a pool of post-1986 undistributed
earnings on that date. Foreign corporation
B was incorporated in 2003 and has always
been owned by foreign shareholders (and
thus never has met the requirements of sec-
tion 902(c)(3)(B)). Both foreign corpora-
2006–37 I.R.B.408September 11, 2006

tion A and foreign corporation B have al-
ways had calendar taxable years. Foreign
corporations A and B (and all of their re-
spective qualified business units as defined
in section 989) maintain a “u” functional
currency. Finally, unless otherwise stated,
all earnings and profits of foreign corpora-
tions A and B are in the general category.
The examples are as follows:
Example 1.(i)Facts. (A) On December 31,
2006, foreign corporations A and B have the follow-
ing earnings and profits and foreign income taxes:
F
oreignCorporationAE&PForeignTaxes
Post-1986 pool1,000u
$350
2004400u160u
2003100u
5u
1,500u
F
oreignCorporationBE&PForeignTaxes
2006100u20u
2005150u
30u
20040u
50u
2003
50u5u
300u
105u
(B) On January 1, 2007, foreign corporation B ac-
quires the assets of foreign corporation A in a reorga-
nization described in section 368(a)(1)(C). Immedi-
ately following the foreign section 381 transaction,
foreign surviving corporation is a CFC.
(ii)Result. Under the rules described in para-
graphs (e)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section, foreign surviv-
ing corporation has the following earnings and profits
and foreign income taxes:
E
&PForeignTaxes
Post-1986 pool1,000u
$350
2006
100u20u
2005
150u
30u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2004E&P:
2004 layer #1 (from Corp A)
400u160u
2004 layer #2 (from Corp B)
0u
50u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2003E&P:
2003 layer #1 (from Corp A)
100u
5u
2003 layer #2 (from Corp B)
50u5u
1,800u
(iii)Post-transaction distribution.(A)During
2007, foreign surviving corporation does not accu-
mulate any earnings and profits or pay or accrue
any foreign income taxes. On December 31, 2007,
foreign surviving corporation distributes 1,725u
to its shareholders. Under the rules of paragraph
(c)(1) of this section, the distribution is first out of
the post-1986 pool, and then out of the pre-pooling
annual layers under the LIFO method, as follows:
E
&PForeignTaxes
Pos
t-1986 pool
1,0
00u
$35
0
200
6
100u20u
2005
150u
30u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2004E&P:
2004 layer #1400u160u
2004 layer #20u0u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2003E&P:
2
003 layer #1
50u2.5u
(100u in layer /
1
50u aggregate 2003
earnings = 66.67% x
75u distribution)
2003 layer #2
25u2.5u
(50u in layer / 150u
aggregate 2003
earnings = 33.33% x
75u distribution)
1,725u
September 11, 20064092006–37 I.R.B.

(B) The foreign income taxes deemed paid by
qualifying shareholders of foreign surviving corpo-
ration upon the distribution are subject to generally
applicable rules and limitations, such as those of sec-
tions 78, 902, and 904(d).
(C) Immediately after the distribution, foreign
surviving corporation has the following earnings and
profits and foreign income taxes:
E
&PForeignTaxes
2004 layer #20u
50u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2003E&P:
2003 layer #1
50u2.5u
2003 layer #2
25u2.5u
75u55u
(iv)Post-transaction earnings. For the taxable
year ending on December 31, 2008, foreign surviving
corporation has 500u of current earnings and profits
in the general category, none of which qualify as sub-
part F income under section 952(a), and pays $70 in
foreign income taxes. As of the close of the 2008 tax-
able year, foreign surviving corporation has the fol-
lowing earnings and profits and foreign income taxes:
E
&PForeignTaxes
Post-1986 pool
500u
$70
20040u
50u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2003E&P:
2003 layer #1
50u2.5u
2003 layer #2
25u2.5u
575u
Example 2.(i)Facts. (A) On December 31,
2006, foreign corporations A and B have the follow-
ing earnings and profits and foreign income taxes:
F
oreignCorporationAE&PForeignTaxes
Post-1986 pool1,000u
$350
2004100u20u
2003
(50u)5u
1,050u
F
oreignCorporationBE&PForeignTaxes
2006100u20u
2005(50u)5u
20040u
50u
2003100u10u
150u85u
(B) On January 1, 2007, foreign corporation B ac-
quires the assets of foreign corporation
A in a reorga-
nization described in section 368(a)(1)(C). Immedi-
ately following the foreign section 381 transaction,
foreign surviving corporation is a CFC.
(ii)Result. Because foreign corporations A and
B have aggregate positive amounts of pre-
1987 ac-
cumulated profits with a deficit in one or more years,
the rules of paragraph (e)(1)(iii)(B) of this section ap-
ply. Accordingly, after the foreign sec
tion 381 trans-
action, foreign surviving corporation has the follow-
ing earnings and profits and foreign inco
me taxes:
E
arnings&Profits:ForeignTaxes:
Positive
E
&PDeficitE&P
Foreign
Taxes
A
vailable
Foreign Taxes
Associated
with
D
eficitE&P
Post-1986 pool1,000u
$350
2006100u20u
2005(50u)5u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2004E&P:
2004 layer #1 (from Corp A)100u20u
2004 layer #2 (from Corp B)0u
50u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2003E&P:
2003 layer #1 (from Corp A)
(50u)5u
2003 layer #2 (from Corp B)100u10u
1,300u(100u)10u
2006–37 I.R.B.410September 11, 2006

(iii)Post-transaction distribution.(A)During
2007, foreign surviving corporation does not accu-
mulate any earnings and profits or pay or accrue
any foreign income taxes. On December 31, 2007,
foreign surviving corporation distributes 1,175u to
its shareholders. Under the rules described in para-
graphs (c)(1) and (e)(1)(iii)(B) of this section, the
distribution is first out of the post-1986 pool, and
then out of the pre-pooling annual layers, as follows:
D
istributionE&PForeignTaxes
Post-1986 pool1,000u
$350
2006100u20u
2005
0u0u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2004E&P:
2004 layer #1
50u
20u
2004 layer #20u0u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2003E&P:
2003 layer #10u0u
2003 layer #2
25u5u
1,175u
(B) Under
paragraph (e)(1)(iii)(B) of this section,
the rules otherwise applicable when a foreign corpo-
ration has an aggregate positive (or zero) amount of
pre-1987
accumulated profits, but a deficit in one or
more years, apply separately to the pre-1987 accu-
mulated profits and related foreign income taxes of
foreign
corporation A and foreign corporation B. As
a result, distributions out of the pre-pooling annual
layers of foreign corporation A and foreign corpora-
tion B ca
nnot exceed the aggregate positive amount
of pre-1987 accumulated profits of each corporation.
Accordingly, only 50u can be distributed from foreign
corporat
ion A’s pre-pooling annual layers and is out
of its 2004 layer #1 (after rolling forward the (50u)
deficit in 2003 layer #1 to reduce earnings in 2004
layer #1 t
o 50u (100u - 50u)). Under the principles of
§1.902–1(b)(3), the full 20u of taxes related to 2004
layer #1 is reduced or deemed paid ($20 x (50/50)).
100u is d
istributed from foreign corporation B’s 2006
annual layer. Foreign corporation B’s (50u) deficit in
2005 is then rolled back to offset its 2003 annual layer
to reduc
e earnings in that layer to 50u, 25u of which is
distributed. Thus, after the distribution, 25u remains
in 2003 la
yer # 2 along with 5u of foreign income
taxes (10u x (25u / 50u)).
(C) The foreign income taxes deemed paid by
qualifyi
ng shareholders of foreign surviving corpo-
ration upon the distribution are subject to generally
applicable rules and limitations, such as those of sec-
tions 78,
902, and 904(d).
(D) Immediately after the distribution, foreign
surviving corporation has the following earnings and
profits
and foreign income taxes:
E
&PForeignTaxes
2005
0u
5u
2004 layer #20u
50u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2003E&P:
2003 layer #10u
5u
2003 layer #2
25u5u
25u65u
(E) Under paragraph (e)(1)(iii)(B) of this section,
the 5u, 50u, and 5u of pre-1987 foreign income taxes
related to foreign surviving corporation’s 2005 layer,
2004 layer #2, and 2003 layer #1, respectively, re-
main in those layers. These foreign income taxes gen-
erally will not be reduced or deemed paid unless a
foreign tax refund restores a positive balance to the
associated earnings pursuant to section 905(c), and
thus will be trapped. See §1.902–2(b)(2).
Example 3.(i)Facts. (A) On December 31,
2006, foreign corporations A and B have the follow-
ing earnings and profits and foreign income taxes:
F
oreignCorporationAE&PForeignTaxes
Post-1986 pool1,000u
$350
2004
150u
20u
2003100u
5u
1,250u
F
oreignCorporationBE&PForeignTaxes
2006100u20u
2005(250u)5u
20040u
50u
2003100u10u
(50u)85u
(B) On January 1, 2007, foreign corporation B ac-
quires the assets of foreign corporation A in a reorga-
nization described in section 368(a)(1)(C). Immedi-
ately following the foreign section 381 transaction,
foreign surviving corporation is a CFC.
(ii)Result. (A) Because foreign corporation B
has an aggregate hovering deficit in pre-1987 accu-
mulated profits, the rules of paragraph (e)(1)(iii)(C)
of this section apply. Accordingly, §1.902–2(b) ap-
plies immediately prior to the foreign section 381
transaction, except that the hovering deficit is car-
ried forward into the foreign surviving corporation’s
post-1986 undistributed earnings pool and will offset
only post-transaction earnings accumulated by for-
eign surviving corporation in the general category.
Accordingly, after the foreign section 381 transac-
tion, foreign surviving corporation has the following
earnings and profits and foreign income taxes:
September 11, 20064112006–37 I.R.B.

Earnings&Profits:ForeignTaxes:
Positive
E
&PHoveringDeficit
Foreign
Taxes
A
vailable
Foreign Taxes
Associated
with
Hovering
D
eficit
Post-1986 pool1,000u
(50u)
$350$0
20060u20u
2005
0u
5u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2004E&P:
2004 layer #1 (from Corp A)
150u
20u
2004 layer #2 (from Corp B)0u
50u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2003E&P:
2003 layer #1 (
from Corp A)
100u
5u
2003 layer #2 (from Corp B)0u10u
1,250u(50u)
$0
(B) Under paragraph (e)(1)(iii)(C) of this section,
the 20u, 5u,
50u, and 10u of pre-1987 foreign in-
come taxes associated with foreign corporation B’s
pre-1987 accumulated profits for 2006, 2005, 2004
layer #2, an
d 2003 layer #2, respectively, remain in
those layers. These foreign income taxes generally
will not be reduced or deemed paid unless a foreign
tax refund
restores a positive balance to the associated
earnings pursuant to section 905(c), and thus will be
trapped. See §1.902–2(b)(2).
(2)If foreign surviving corporation is a
nonpooling corporation. If the foreign sur-
viving corporation is a nonpooling corpo-
ration, then the pre-pooling annual layers
shall be determined under the rules of this
paragraph (e)(2).
(i)Qualifying earnings and taxes.The
pre-pooling annual layers shall consist of
the pre-1987 accumulated profits and the
pre-1987 foreign income taxes of the for-
eign acquiring corporation and the foreign
target corporation. If the foreign acquiring
corporation or the foreign target corpora-
tion (or both) has post-1986 undistributed
earnings or a deficit in post-1986 undis-
tributed earnings, then those earnings or
deficits and any related post-1986 foreign
income taxes shall be recharacterized as
pre-1987 accumulated profits or deficits
and pre-1987 foreign income taxes of the
foreign acquiring corporation or the for-
eign target corporation accumulated im-
mediately prior to the foreign section 381
transaction.
(ii)Carryover rule. Subject to para-
graph (e)(2)(iii) of this section, the
amounts described in paragraph (e)(2)(i)
of this section shall carry over to the
foreign surviving corporation but shall
not be combined. If the foreign acquir-
ing corporation and the foreign target
corporation have pre-1987 accumulated
profits in the same year and a distribu-
tion is made therefrom, the principles
of §1.902–1(b)(2)(ii) and (3) shall apply
separately to reduce pre-1987 accumu-
latedprofitsandpre-1987foreignincome
taxes of the foreign acquiring corporation
and the foreign target corporation on a
pro ratabasis. For further guidance, see
Rev. Rul. 68–351, 1968–2 C.B. 307; Rev.
Rul. 70–373, 1970–2 C.B. 152 (see also
§601.601(d)(2) of this chapter); see also
paragraph (f)(2) of this section (governing
the reconciliation of taxable years).
(iii)Deficits—(A)In general.Therules
of this paragraph (e)(2)(iii) apply when,
immediately prior to the foreign section
381 transaction (and after application of
the last sentence of paragraph (e)(2)(i) of
this section), the foreign acquiring corpo-
ration or the foreign target corporation (or
both) has a deficit in one or more years that
comprise its pre-1987 accumulated prof-
its. See also paragraphs (f)(1) and (4) of
this section (describing other rules applica-
ble to a deficit described in this paragraph
(e)(2)(iii)).
(B)Aggregate positive pre-1987 accu-
mulated profits. If the foreign acquiring
corporation or the foreign target corpora-
tion (or both) has an aggregate positive
(or zero) amount of pre-1987 accumulated
profits, but a deficit in pre-1987 accumu-
lated profits in one or more years, then the
rules otherwise applicable to such deficits
shall apply separately to the pre-1987 ac-
cumulated profits and related foreign in-
come taxes of such corporation. A deficit
in pre-1987 accumulated profits for one or
more years is applied to reduce pre-1987
accumulated profits on a LIFO basis. Any
remaining deficit shall be applied to reduce
pre-1987 accumulated profits in succeed-
ing years. See Rev. Rul. 74–550, 1974–2
C.B. 209 (see also §601.601(d)(2) of this
chapter);Champion Int’l Corp. v. Com-
missioner, 81 T.C. 424 (1983), acq. in re-
sult, 1987–2 C.B. 1; Rev. Rul. 87–72,
1987–2 C.B. 170 (see also §601.601(d)(2)
of this chapter). As a result, no amount in
excess of the aggregate positive amount of
pre-1987 accumulated profits shall be dis-
tributed from the pre-transaction earnings
of the foreign acquiring corporation or the
foreign target corporation.
(C)Aggregate deficit in pre-1987 accu-
mulated profits. If the foreign acquiring
corporation or the foreign target corpora-
tion (or both) has an aggregate deficit in
pre-1987 accumulated profits, a hovering
deficit as defined underparagraph (d)(2)(i)
of this section, then the rules otherwise ap-
plicable to such hovering deficits shall ap-
ply separately to the pre-transaction earn-
ings and profits and related taxes of the
relevant corporation. See,e.g., sections
316(a) and 381(c)(2)(B). Thus, any hov-
ering deficit shall offset only post-transac-
tion earnings accumulated by the foreign
surviving corporation in the same separate
category of earnings and profits to which
the relevant portion of the hovering deficit
is attributable. Post-transaction earnings
do not include earnings and profits that
are earned after the foreign section 381
transaction but distributed or deemed dis-
tributed in the same year they are earned.
Following the principles of §1.902–2(b),
if there is an aggregate deficit in pre-1987
accumulated profits, any related pre-1987
foreign income taxes generally will not be
2006–37 I.R.B.412September 11, 2006

reduced or deemed paid unless a foreign
tax refund restores a positive balance to
the associated earnings pursuant to section
905(c), and creates a pre-transaction ag-
gregate positive balance for pre-1987 ac-
cumulated profits.
(D)Deficit and positive separate cat-
egories within annual layers. For pur-
poses of applying the rules of paragraphs
(e)(2)(iii)(B) and (C) of this section, if
within a single pre-pooling annual layer,
the foreign acquiring corporation or the
foreign target corporation (or both) has
a deficit in pre-1987 accumulated profits
in a separate category and positive pre-
1987 accumulated profits in another sepa-
rate category, the deficit shall first be used
to offset the positive pre-1987 accumu-
lated profits in the other separate category
in the same pre-pooling annual layer. Any
remaining deficit shall be carried forward
or back to other years according to the
rules of paragraph (e)(2)(iii)(B) or (C) as
applicable.
(iv)Pre-1987 section 960 earnings and
profits and foreign income taxes. The pre-
1987 section 960 earnings and profits and
pre-1987 section 960 foreign income taxes
of the foreign acquiring corporation and
the foreign target corporation shall carry
over to the foreign surviving corporation
but shall not be combined. The rules other-
wise applicable to such amounts shall ap-
ply separately to thepre-1987 section 960
earnings and profits and pre-1987 section
960 foreign income taxes of the foreign ac-
quiring corporation and the foreign target
corporation on apro ratabasis. For fur-
ther guidance, see Notice 88–70, 1988–2
C.B. 369 (see also §601.601(d)(2) of this
chapter).
(v)Examples. The following exam-
ples illustrate the rules of this paragraph
(e)(2). The examples assume the follow-
ing facts: both foreign corporation A and
foreign corporation B have always had cal-
endar taxable years.Foreign corporations
A and B (and all of their respective qual-
ified business units as defined in section
989) maintain a “u” functional currency,
and 1u = US$1 at all times. Finally, un-
less otherwise stated, all earnings and prof-
its of foreign corporations A and B are in
the general category. The examples are as
follows:
Example 1.(i)Facts. (A) Foreign corporations A
and B both were incorporated in 2003. Nine percent
of the voting stock of foreign corporation A is owned
by domestic corporate shareholder C. Nine percent
of the voting stock of foreign corporation B is owned
by domestic corporate shareholder D. Shareholders C
and D are unrelated. The remaining 91% of the vot-
ing stock of each foreign corporation is owned by un-
related foreign shareholders. Thus, neither corpora-
tion meets the requirements of section 902(c)(3)(B).
On December 31, 2006, foreign corporations A and
B have the following earnings and profits and foreign
income taxes:
F
oreignCorporationAE&PForeignTaxes
2006
500u350u
2005
400u300u
2004400u160u
2003100u
5u
1,400u
815u
F
oreignCorporationBE&PForeignTaxes
2006100u20u
2005
300u60u
20040u
50u
2003
50u5u
450u135u
(B) On January 1, 2007, foreign corporation B ac-
quires the assets of foreign corporation A in a reorga-
nization described in section 368(a)(1)(C). Immedi-
ately following the foreign section 381 transaction,
foreign surviving corporation is a nonpooling corpo-
ration that does not meet the requirements of section
902(c)(3)(B).
(ii)Result. Under the rules described in para-
graphs (e)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section, foreign surviv-
ing corporation has the following earnings and profits
and foreign income taxes:
E
&PForeignTaxes
TwoSide-by-SideLayersof2006E&P:
2006 layer #1 (from Corp A)
500u350u
2006 layer #2 (from Corp B)
100u20u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2005E&P:
2005 layer #1 (from Corp A)
400u300u
2005 layer #2 (from Corp B)
300u60u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2004E&P:
2004 layer #1 (from Corp A)
40
0u
16
0u
2
004 layer #2 (from Corp B)
0u
50u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2003E&P:
2003 layer #1 (from Corp A)
1
00u
5
u
2003 layer #2 (from Corp B)
50u5u
1,850u950u
(iii)Post-transaction distribution.(A)During
2007, foreign surviving corporation does not accu-
mulate any earnings and profits or pay or accrue
any foreign income taxes. On December 31, 2007,
foreign surviving corporation distributes 600u to its
shareholders. Under the rules of paragraph (c)(3)
of this section, the distribution is out of pre-pooling
annual layers under the LIFO method as follows:
September 11, 20064132006–37 I.R.B.

E&PForeignTaxes
TwoSide-by-SideLayersof2006E&P:
2006 layer #1 (from Corp A)
500u350u
2006 layer #2 (from Corp B)
100u20u
600u370u
(B) Foreign surviving corporation’s foreign
income tax accounts are reduced to reflect the dis-
tribution of earnings and profits notwithstanding
that no shareholders are eligible to claim deemed
paid foreign income taxes under section 902. See
§1.902–1(a)(10)(iii).
(C) Immediately after the distribution, foreign
surviving corporation has the following earnings and
profits and foreign income taxes:
E
&PForeignTaxes
TwoSide-by-SideLayersof2005E&P:
2005 layer #1 (from Corp A)
400u300u
2005 layer #2 (from Corp B)
300u60u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2004E&P:
2004 layer #1 (from Corp A)
400u160u
2004 layer #2 (from Corp B)
0u
50u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2003E&P:
2003 layer #1 (from Corp A)
100u
5u
2003 layer #2 (from Corp B)
50u5u
1,250u580u
Example 2.(i)Facts. (A) The facts are the same
as inExample 1(i)(A), except that foreign corpora-
tion A met the requirements of section 902(c)(3)(B)
on January 1, 2005, when U.S. corporate shareholder
C acquired an additional 1% of voting stock for a to-
tal ownership interest of 10%; foreign corporation A
thereby became a pooling corporation. On December
31, 2006, foreign corporations A and B have the fol-
lowing earnings and profits and foreign income taxes:
F
oreignCorporationAE&PForeignTaxes
Post-1986 pool900u
$650
2004400u160u
2003100u
5u
1,400u
F
oreignCorporationBE&PForeignTaxes
2006100u20u
2005
300u60u
20040u
50u
2003
50u5u
450u135u
(B) On January 1, 2007, foreign corporation B ac-
quires the assets of foreign corporation A in a reorga-
nization described in section 368(a)(1)(C). Immedi-
ately following the foreign section 381 transaction,
foreign surviving corporation is a nonpooling corpo-
ration that does not meet the requirements of section
902(c)(3)(B).
(ii)Result. Under the rules described in para-
graphs (e)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section, foreign surviv-
ing corporation has the following earnings and profits
and foreign income taxes:
E
&PForeignTaxes
TwoSide-by-SideLayersof2006E&P:
2006 layer #1 (from Corp A’s pool)
900u
$650
2006 layer #2 (from Corp B’s layer)
100u20u
2005 (from Corp B):
300u60u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2004E&P:
2004 layer #1 (from Corp A)
400u160u
2004 layer #2 (from Corp B)
0u
50u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2003E&P:
2003 layer #1 (from Corp A)
100u
5u
2003 layer #2 (from Corp B)
50u5u
1,850u
(iii)Subsequent ownership change. OnJuly1,
2010, USS (a domestic corporation) acquires 100%
of the stock of foreign surviving corporation. Under
the rules of paragraph (f)(3) of this section, foreign
surviving corporation begins to pool its earnings and
profits under section 902(c)(3) as of January 1, 2010.
Foreign surviving corporation’s earnings and profits
and foreign income taxes accrued before January 1,
2010 retain their characteras pre-1987 accumulated
profits and pre-1987 foreign income taxes.
Example 3.(i)Facts. (A) The facts are the same
as inExample 2(i)(A), except that on December 31,
2006–37 I.R.B.414September 11, 2006

2006, foreign corporations A and B have the follow-
ing earnings and profits and foreign income taxes:
F
oreignCorporationAE&PForeignTaxes
Post-1986 pool1,000u
$500
2004(200u)10u
2003400u
5u
1,200u
F
oreignCorporationBE&PForeignTaxes
2006300u20u
2005
(100u)60u
20040u
50u
2003
50u5u
250u135u
(B) On January 1, 2007, foreign corporation B ac-
quires the assets of foreign corporation A in a reorga-
nization described in section 368(a)(1)(C). Immedi-
ately following the foreign section 381 transaction,
foreign surviving corporation is a nonpooling corpo-
ration that does not meet the requirements of section
902(c)(3)(B).
(ii)Result. Because foreign corporations A and
B have aggregate positive amounts of pre-1987 ac-
cumulated profits with a deficit in one or more years,
the rules of paragraph (e)(2)(iii)(B) of this section ap-
ply. Accordingly, after the foreign section 381 trans-
action, foreign surviving corporation has the follow-
ing earnings and profits and foreign income taxes:
E
arnings&Profits:ForeignTaxes:
Positive
E
&PDeficitE&P
Foreign
Taxes
A
vailable
Foreign Taxes
Associated
with
D
eficitE&P
TwoSide-by-SideLayersof2006E&P:
2006 layer #1 (from Corp A’s pool)1,000u
$500
2006 layer #2 (from Corp B’s layer)300u20u
2005 (from Corp B)
(100u)60u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2004E&P:
2004 layer #1 (from Corp A)(200u)10u
2004 layer #2 (from Corp B)0u
50u
T
woSid
e-by-SideLayersof2003E&P:
2003 layer #1 (from Corp A)400u
5u
2003 layer #2 (from Corp B)
50u5u
1,750
u
(300u
)
70u
(iii)Post-transaction distribution.(A)During
2007, foreign surviving corporation does not accu-
mulate any earnings and profits or pay or accrue
any foreign income taxes. On December 31, 2007,
foreign surviving corporation distributes 1,300u to
its shareholders. Under the rules described in para-
graphs (c)(3) and (e)(2)(iii)(B) of this section, the
distribution is out of the pre-pooling annual layers,
as follows:
E
&PForeignTaxes
TwoSide-by-SideLayersof2006E&P:
2006 layer #1
1,000u
$500
2006 layer #2
250u
20u
2
003E&P:
2003 layer #1
50u1.25u (25% of 5u taxes)
1,300u
(
B) Under paragraph (e)(2)(iii)(B) of this section,
the rules otherwise applicable when a foreign corpo-
ration has an aggregate positive (or zero) amount of
pre-1987 accumulated profits, but a deficit in one or
more years, apply separately to the pre-1987 accu-
mulated profits and related pre-1987 foreign income
taxes of foreign corporation A and foreign corpora-
tion B. As a result, distributions out of the pre-pool-
ing annual layers of foreign corporation A and for-
eign corporation B cannot exceed the aggregate posi-
tive amount of pre-1987 accumulated profits of each
c
orporation. Accordingly, only 1,200u and 250u can
be distributed out of foreign corporation A’s and for-
eign corporation B’s pre-pooling annual layers, re-
spectively. Thus, 1,000u of the distribution is out of
foreign corporation A’s 2006 layer #1 and 250u is out
of foreign corporation B’s 2006 layer #2 (after rolling
forward (50u) of the deficit in 2005 layer to reduce
earnings in 2006 layer #1 to 250u (300u - 50u)). Un-
der the principles of §1.902–1(b)(3), all of the taxes
in each of those respective layers are reduced. The
remaining 50u is distributed from foreign corporation
A
’s 2003 layer #1 (after rolling back the (200u) deficit
in 2004 layer #1 to reduce earnings in 2003 layer #1
to 200u (400u - 200u)). Thus, after the distribution,
150u remains in the 2003 layer #1 along with 3.75u
of foreign income taxes (5u x (150u / 200u)).
(C) Foreign surviving corporation’s foreign in-
come tax accounts are reduced to reflect the distribu-
tion of earnings and profits notwithstanding that no
shareholders are eligible to claim a credit for deemed
paid foreign income taxes under section 902. See
§1.902–1(a)(10)(iii).
September 11, 20064152006–37 I.R.B.

(D) Immediately after the distribution, foreign
surviving corporation has the following earnings and
profits and foreign income taxes:
E
&PForeignTaxes
2005
0u60u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2004E&P:
2004 layer #1
0u10u
2004 layer #2
0u
50u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2003E&P:
2003 layer #1
150u3.75u
2003 layer #20u
5u
150u128.75u
(E) Under paragraph (e)(2)(iii)(B) of this section,
the 60u, 10u, 50u, and 5u of foreign income taxes re-
lated to foreign surviving corporation’s 2005 layer,
2004 layer #1, 2004 layer #2, and 2003 layer #2, re-
spectively, remain in those layers. These foreign in-
come taxes generally will not be reduced or deemed
paid unless a foreign tax refund restores a positive
balance to the associated earnings pursuant to section
905(c), and thus will be trapped. See §1.902–2(b)(2).
Example 4.(i)Facts. (A) The facts are the same
as inExample 2(i)(A), except that on December 31,
2006, foreign corporations A and B have the follow-
ing earnings and profits and foreign income taxes:
F
oreignCorporationAE&PForeignTaxes
Post-1986 pool(1,000u)
$20
2004(200u)10u
2003400u
5u
(800u)
F
oreignCorporationBE&PForeignTaxes
2006100u20u
2005
300u60u
20040u
50u
2003
50u5u
450u135u
(B) On January 1, 2007, foreign corporation A ac-
quires the assets of foreign corporation B in a reorga-
nization described in section 368(a)(1)(C). Immedi-
ately following the foreign section 381 transaction,
foreign surviving corporation is a nonpooling corpo-
ration.
(ii)Result. Under paragraph (e)(2)(i) of this sec-
tion, foreign corporation A’s post-1986 pool is rechar-
acterized as a 2006 layer of pre-1987 accumulated
profits. Because after the foreign section 381 trans-
action foreign corporation A has an aggregate deficit
in pre-1987 accumulated profits, the rules of para-
graph (e)(2)(iii)(C) of this section apply and the rules
otherwise applicable apply separately to the pre-1987
accumulated profits that carry over to foreign sur-
viving corporation from foreign corporation A. The
(800u) aggregate deficit in foreign corporation A’s
pre-1987 accumulated profits is a hovering deficit
that will offset only post-transaction earnings accu-
mulated by foreign surviving corporation in the gen-
eral category. Accordingly, after the foreign section
381 transaction, foreign surviving corporation has the
following earnings and profits and foreign income
taxes:
E
arnings&Profits:ForeignTaxes:
Positive
E
&PDeficitE&P
F
oreign
Taxes
A
vailable
Foreign Taxes
A
ssociated
with
D
eficitE&P
Hovering deficit from Corp A’s annual
l
ayers
(800u)0
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2006E&P:
2006 layer #1 (from Corp A’s pool)0u
$20
2
006 layer #2 (from Corp B’s layer)
1
00u
2
0u
2005 (from Corp B)
300u60u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2004E&P:
2004 layer #1 (from Corp A)0u10u
2004 layer #2 (from Corp B)0u
50u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2003E&P:
2003 layer #1 (from Corp A)0u
5u
2003 layer #2 (from Corp B)
50u5u
450u
(800u)140u
2006–37 I.R.B.416September 11, 2006

(B) Under paragraph (e)(2)(iii)(C) of this section,
the $20, 10u, and 5u of pre-1987 foreign income taxes
associated with foreign corporation A’s pre-1987 ac-
cumulated profits for 2006 layer #1, 2004 layer #1,
and 2003 layer #1, respectively, remain in those lay-
ers. These foreign income taxes generally will not be
reduced or deemed paid unless a foreign tax refund
restores a positive balance to the associated earnings
pursuant to section 905(c), and thus will be trapped.
See §1.902–2(b)(2).
(iii)Post-transaction distribution.(A)During
2007, foreign surviving corporation does not accu-
mulate any earnings and profits or pay or accrue
any foreign income taxes. On December 31, 2007,
foreign surviving corporation distributes 200u to its
shareholders. Under the rules described in paragraph
(e)(2)(iii)(C) of this section, no distribution can be
made out of the pre-1987 accumulated profits of
foreign corporation A (and the (800u) aggregate
hovering deficit will offset only post-transaction
earnings accumulated by foreign surviving corpo-
ration). Thus, the distribution is out of pre-pooling
annual layers as follows:
E
&PForeignTaxesPaid
2006 layer #2
100u20u
2005
100u20u
200u40u
(B) Foreign surviving corporation’s foreign
income tax accounts are reduced to reflect the dis-
tribution of earnings and profits notwithstanding
that no shareholders are eligible to claim deemed
paid foreign income taxes under section 902. See
§1.902–1(a)(10)(iii).
(C) Immediately after the distribution, foreign
surviving corporation has the following earnings and
profits and foreign income taxes:
E
arnings&Profits:ForeignTaxes:
Positive
E
&PDeficitE&P
Foreign
Taxes
A
vailable
Foreign Taxes
Associated
with
D
eficitE&P
Hovering deficit from Corp A’s annual
layers
(800u)0
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2006E&P:
2006 layer #1 (from Corp A’s pool)0u
$20
2006 layer #2 (from Corp B’s layer)0u0u
2005 (from Corp B)
200u40u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2004E&P:
2004 layer #1 (from Corp A)0u10u
2004 layer #2 (from Corp B)0u
50u
T
woSide-by-SideLayersof2003E&P:
2003 layer #1 (from Corp A)0u
5u
2003 layer #2 (from Corp B)
50u5u
250u
(800u)140u
(f)Special rules—(1)Treatment of
deficit—(i)General rule.Anydeficit
described in paragraph (d)(2), (e)(1)(iii),
or (e)(2)(iii) of this section shall not be
taken into account in determining current
or accumulated earnings and profits of a
foreign surviving corporation other than to
offset post-transaction accumulated earn-
ings, as defined in paragraph (d)(2)(ii)
of this section, including for purposes of
calculating—
(A) The earnings and profits limitation
of section 952(c)(1)(A); and
(B) the amount of the foreign surviving
corporation’s subpart F income as defined
in section 952(a).
(ii)Exceptions. The rule in paragraph
(i) shall not apply for purposes of calculat-
ing an earnings and profits limitation under
section 952(c)(1)(B) or (C).
(iii)Examples. The following examples
illustrate the principles of this paragraph
(f)(1). The examples assume the following
facts: foreign corporation A, incorporated
in 2002, is and always has been a wholly
owned subsidiary of USP, a domestic cor-
poration. Foreign corporation B, incorpo-
rated in 2004, is and always has been a
wholly owned subsidiary of foreign corpo-
ration A. Both foreign corporation A and
foreign corporation B are organized under
the laws of foreign country X and have
always had a calendar taxable year. For-
eign corporations A and B (and all of their
respective qualified business units as de-
fined in section 989) maintain a “u” func-
tional currency. Unless otherwise stated,
any earnings and profits or deficit in earn-
ings and profits of foreign corporation A
and B in the general category are attrib-
utable to subpart F income derived from
foreign base company sales income. For-
eign corporation C is a wholly owned sub-
sidiary of USP2 and was organized in 2004
under the laws of foreign country Y. For-
eign corporation C (andall of its qualified
business units as defined in section 989)
maintains a “u” functional currency. Earn-
ings and profits of foreign corporation C
in the general category are not attributable
to subpart F income. The examples are as
follows:
Example 1.(i)Facts. (A) On December 31,
2007, foreign corporations A and B have the follow-
ing post-1986 undistributed earnings and post-1986
foreign income taxes:
September 11, 20064172006–37 I.R.B.

ForeignCorporationA
SeparateCateg
ory
E&PForeignTaxes
General(100u)
$25
F
oreignCorporationB
SeparateCateg
ory
E&PForeignTaxes
General0u
$10
(B) On January 1, 2008, foreign corporation B
elects under §301.7701–3(c) of this chapter to be dis-
regarded as an entity separate from foreign corpora-
tion A. Accordingly, foreign corporation B is deemed
to have distributed all its property to foreign corpora-
tion A in a liquidation described in section 332.
(ii)Result. Under the rules described in para-
graphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section, foreign surviving
corporation A has the following post-1986 undis-
tributed earnings and post-1986 foreign income
taxes:
E
arnings&Profits:ForeignTaxes:
SeparateCategory
Positive
E
&PHoveringDeficit
Foreign
Taxes
A
vailable
Foreign Taxes
Associated
with
H
overingDeficit
General0u(100u)
$10$25
(iii)Post-transaction earnings and subpart F lim-
itations. (A) In its taxable year ending on December
31, 2008, foreign surviving corporation A earns 30
0u
of subpart F general category income with respect to
which it pays $50 in foreign income taxes. The hov-
ering deficit of (100u) meets the requirements und
er
section 952(c)(1)(B) and therefore is taken into ac-
count as a qualified deficit that may be used by USP
to offset a portion of its income inclusion relate
dto
foreign surviving corporation A’s subpart F income
of 300u in the 2008 taxable year. Accordingly, USP
includes 200u in taxable income for the year and is
eligible for a deemed paid foreign tax credit under
section 960 of $40 (200u subpart F inclusion / 300
post-1986 undistributed earnings in the general cat-
egory = 66.67%, x $60 foreign income taxes in the
general category = $40). USP will also include the
deemed paid foreign taxesof $40 in taxable income
for the year as a deemed dividend pursuant to secti
on
78. Though the (100u) hovering deficit of foreign
surviving corporation A is taken into account for pur-
poses of limiting USP’s subpart F income inclusion
under section 952(c)(1)(B), the amount of the hove
r-
ing deficit is not reduced for purposes of sections 316
and 902 and none of the associated foreign income
taxes are included in the post-1986 foreign income
taxes pool.
(B) As of January 1, 2009, foreign surviving cor-
poration A has the following post-1986 undistribu
ted
earnings and post-1986 foreign income taxes:
E
arnings&Profits:ForeignTaxes:
SeparateCategory
Positive
E
&PHoveringDeficit
Foreign
Taxes
A
vailable
Foreign Taxes
Associated
with
H
overingDeficit
General100u(100u)
$20$25
(C) The 200u included as subpart F income con-
stitutes previously taxed earnings under section 959.
Example 2.(i)Facts. (A) On July 1, 2007, for-
eign corporation B elects under §301.7701–3(c) of
this chapter to be disregarded as an entity separate
from foreign corporation A. Accordingly, foreign cor-
poration B is deemed to have distributed all of its
property to foreign corporation A in a liquidation de-
scribedinsection332.
(B) Neither foreign corporation A nor B has any
post-1986 undistributed earnings or post-1986 for-
eign income taxes as of the beginning of the 2007
taxable year. For its short taxable year ending on
June 30, 2007, foreign corporation B has the follow-
ing post-1986 undistributed earnings and post-1986
foreign income taxes:
F
oreignCorporationB
SeparateCategoryE&PForeignTaxes
General(200u)
$30
(C) For the 2007 taxable year, foreign surviving
corporation A earns a total of 200u of subpart F for-
eign based company sales income in the general cat-
egory with respect to which it pays $40 in foreign in-
come taxes.
(ii)Result. (A)Underparagraph(d)(2)ofthis
section, foreign corporation B’s (200u) deficit carries
over to foreign surviving corporation A as a hovering
deficit. Nevertheless, because it is a deficit of a qual-
ified chain member for a taxable year ending within
the 2007 taxable year of foreign surviving corpora-
tion A, the (200u) deficit meets the requirements un-
der section 952(c)(1)(C) and therefore may still be
taken into account for purposes of limiting foreign
surviving corporation A’s subpart F income. Accord-
ingly, foreign surviving corporation A’s 200u of sub-
part F income for the 2007 taxable year is fully off-
set by the (200u) deficit of foreign corporation B,
and USP will have no subpart F income inclusion
for the 2007 taxable year. The offset under section
952(c)(1)(C) does not result in a reduction of the hov-
ering deficit for purposes of section 316 or section
902. The hovering deficit may not also be taken into
account under section 952(c)(1)(B).
(B) Because USP has no subpart F income in-
clusion, foreign surviving corporation A’s subpart F
earnings of 200u will accumulate and be added to its
post-1986 undistributed earnings as of the beginning
of 2008. Under the rules of paragraph (f)(5) of this
section, apro rataamount, in this case 50% or 100u,
will be deemed to have been accumulated prior to the
foreign section 381 transaction and the other 50%,
or 100u, will be deemed to have been accumulated
after the foreign section 381 transaction. The 100u
of post-transaction earnings will be offset by (100u)
of the hovering deficit for purposes of determining
2006–37 I.R.B.418September 11, 2006

the opening balance of the post-1986 undistributed
earnings pool in 2008. Because the amount of earn-
ings offset by the hovering deficit is 50% of the total
amount of the hovering deficit, $15 (50% of $30) of
the related taxes are added to the post-1986 foreign
income taxes pool as well. The 100u of pre-transac-
tion earnings remain in the post-1986 undistributed
earnings pool. Accordingly, foreign surviving cor-
poration A has the following post-1986 undistributed
earnings and post-1986 foreign income taxes on Jan-
uary 1, 2008:
E
arnings&Profits:ForeignTaxes:
SeparateCategory
Positive
E
&PHoveringDeficit
Foreign
Taxes
A
vailable
Foreign Taxes
Associated
with
H
overingDeficit
General100u(100u)
$55$15
Example 3.(i)Facts. (A) On January 1, 2007,
foreign corporation B and foreign corporation C have
the following post-1986 undistributed earnings and
post-1986 foreign income taxes:
F
oreignCorporationB
SeparateCategoryE&PForeignTaxes
General(100u)
$0
F
oreignCorporationC
SeparateCategory
E&PForeignTaxes
General0u
$10
(B) On July 1, 2007, foreign corporation B ac-
quires the assets of foreign corporation C in a reor-
ganization described in section 368(a)(1)(C). Imme-
diately following the foreign section 381 transaction,
foreign surviving corporation B is a CFC.
(C) During the 2007 taxable year foreign surviv-
ing corporation B has a current deficit of (400u) and
$60 of related foreign income taxes. During its short
taxable year ending on June 30, 2007, foreign corpo-
ration C has no additional earnings and pays or ac-
crues no foreign income taxes.
(ii)Result. (A) Under the rules of paragraph (f)(5)
of this section, apro rataamount, in this case 50% or
(200u), of foreign surviving corporation B’s (400u)
current year deficit for the 2007 taxable year will be
deemed to have been accumulated prior to the foreign
section 381 transaction and be treated as a hovering
deficit. The other 50%, or (200u) of the deficit will
be deemed to have been accumulated after the foreign
section 381 transaction. The related foreign income
taxes of $60 will also be allocated on a similar 50/50
basis.
(B) Under the rules described in paragraphs (d)(1)
and (2) of this section, foreign surviving corporation
B has the following post-1986 undistributed earnings
and post-1986 foreign income taxes as of January 1,
2008:
E
arnings&Profits:ForeignTaxes:
SeparateCategoryE&PHoveringDeficit
Foreign
Taxes
A
vailable
Foreign Taxes
Associated
with
H
overingDeficit
General(200u)(300u)
$40$30
(iii)Subpart F income limitations. Even though
(200u) of the current year deficit is treated as a hov-
e
ring deficit, the full (400u) current year deficit in
2007 of foreign surviving corporation B meets the re-
quirements under section 952(c)(1)(C) and therefore
i
s available as a limitation on subpart F income, to
the extent foreign corporation A, which wholly owns
foreign surviving corporation B, earns any subpart F
income in the 2007 taxableyear. Any such offset un-
der section 952(c)(1)(C) will have no effect on the
earnings and profits and foreign income tax accounts
above of foreign surviving corporation B for purposes
of sections 316 and 902. Moreover, to the extent the
hovering deficit reduces subpart F income under sec-
tion 952(c)(1)(C), it may not also be taken into ac-
count under section 952(c)(1)(B).
(2)Reconciling taxable years.Ifafor-
eign acquiring corporation and a foreign
target corporation had taxable years end-
ing on different dates, then thepro ratadis-
tribution rules of paragraphs (e)(1)(ii) and
(e)(2)(ii) of this section shall apply with re-
spect to the taxable years that end within
the same calendar year.
(3)Post-transaction change of status.
If a foreign surviving corporation that is
subject to the rules of paragraph (c)(2)
of this section subsequently becomes a
pooling corporation (by reason, for ex-
ample, of a reorganization, liquidation,
or change of ownership), then post-1986
undistributed earnings and post-1986
foreign income taxes that were recharac-
terized as pre-1987 accumulated profits
and pre-1987 foreign income taxes, re-
spectively, under paragraph (e)(2)(i) of
this section retain their characterization as
a pre-pooling annual layer.
(4)Ordering rule for multiple hover-
ing deficits—(i)Rule.Aforeignsur-
viving corporation shall apply the deficit
rules of paragraphs (d)(2), (e)(1)(iii), and
(e)(2)(iii) of this section in that order if
more than one of such rules applies to the
foreign surviving corporation.
(ii)Example. The following example
illustrates the principles of this paragraph
(f)(4). The example assumes the follow-
ing facts: foreign corporation A has been
a pooling corporation since its incorpora-
tion on January 1, 1998. Foreign corpora-
tion B has been a nonpooling corporation
since its incorporation on January 1, 2000.
Foreign corporations A and B have always
had calendar taxable years. Foreign cor-
porations A and B (and all of their respec-
tive qualified business units as defined in
section 989) maintain a “u” functional cur-
rency. All earnings and profits of foreign
corporation B are in the general category.
September 11, 20064192006–37 I.R.B.

Finally, unless otherwise stated, any earn-
ings and profits in the passive category re-
sulted from a look-through dividend that
was paid by a lower-tier CFC out of earn-
ings accumulated when the CFC was a
noncontrolled section 902 corporation and
that qualified for the subpart F same-coun-
try exception under section 954(c)(3)(A).
The example is as follows:
Example—(i)Facts. (A) On December 31, 2006,
foreign corporations A and B have the following
earnings and profits and foreign income taxes:
F
oreignCorporationA
Post-1986PoolSeparateCategory:
E&PForeignTaxes
Passive400u
$160
General(300u)
$25
100u
$185
F
oreignCorporationBE&PForeignTaxes
2006(300u)
50u
2005
100u
25u
(200u)
75u
(B) On January 1, 2007, foreign corporation B ac-
quires th
e assets of foreign corporation A in a reorga-
nization described in section 368(a)(1)(C). Immedi-
ately following the foreign section 381 transaction,
foreign s
urviving corporation is a CFC.
(ii)Result. Under the rules described in para-
graphs (d)(1), (d)(2), (e)(1)(i), (e)(1)(ii), and
(e)(1)(iii) of this section, foreign surviving cor-
poration
has the following earnings and profits and
foreign income taxes:
E
arnings&Profits:ForeignTaxes:
Positive
E
&PHoveringDeficit
Foreign
Taxes
A
vailable
Foreign Taxes
Associat
ed
with
H
overingDeficit
Post-1986Pool
SeparateC
ategory
Passive400u
$160
General(300u)
$25
Carryforward
pre-pooling deficit
from Corp B(200u)0
2006 (from Corp B)0u
50u
2005 (from Corp B)
0u
25u
400u
(500u)
$25
(iii)Post-transaction earnings. (A) In the taxable
year ending on December 31, 2007, foreign surviv-
ing corporation accumulates earnings and profits and
pays related foreign income taxes as follows:
P
ost-1986PoolSeparateCategory:E&PForeignTaxes
Passive
150u
$40
General400u
$60
550u
$100
(B) None of the earnings and profits qualify as
subpart F income as defined in section 952(a). Un-
der paragraph (f)(4)(i) of this section, the rules of
paragraph (d)(2) of this section apply before the rules
of paragraph (e)(1)(iii) of this section. Accordingly,
post-transaction earnings in a separate category are
first offset by a hovering deficit in the same sepa-
rate category in the post-1986 pool. Thus, foreign
surviving corporation’s (300u) deficit in the general
category offsets 300u of post-transaction earnings in
the general category. After application of paragraph
(d)(2) of this section, the (200u) deficit in the gen-
eral category carried forward from foreign corpora-
tion B’s pre-pooling aggregate deficit offsets the re-
maining 100u of post-transaction earnings in the gen-
eral category. Accordingly,foreign surviving corpo-
ration has the following earnings and profits and for-
eign income taxes at the end of 2007:
2006–37 I.R.B.420September 11, 2006

Earnings&Profits:ForeignTaxes:
Positive
E
&PHoveringDeficit
Foreign
Taxes
A
vailable
Foreign Taxes
Associated
with
H
overingDeficit
Post-1986Pool
SeparateCategory
Passive
550u
$200
General
$85
Carryforward
pre-pooling d
eficit
from Corp B(100u)$0
2006 (from Corp B)0u
50u
2005 (from Corp B)
0u
25u
550u
(100u)
$0
(C)Underpar
agraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section, all
of the $25 of post-1986 foreign income taxes related
to the (300u) hovering deficit in the general cate-
gory is adde
d to the foreign surviving corporation’s
post-1986 foreign income taxes of $60 in that cate-
gory (because post-transaction earnings in the gen-
eral catego
ry have exceeded the deficit in that cat-
egory). Under paragraph (e)(1)(iii)(C) of this sec-
tion, the 50u and 25u of foreign income taxes associ-
ated with f
oreign corporation B’s pre-1987 accumu-
lated profits for 2006 and 2005 remain in those lay-
ers. These foreign income taxes generally will not be
reduced or
deemed paid unless a foreign tax refund
restores a positive balance to the associated earnings
pursuant to section 905(c), and thus will be trapped.
See §1.90
2–2(b)(2).
(5)Pro ra
ta rule for earnings and
deficits
during transaction year.(i)For
purposes
of offsetting post-transaction
earnings
of a foreign surviving corporation
under the
rules described in paragraphs
(d)(2),
(e)(1)(iii), and (e)(2)(iii) of this
section
, the earnings and profits, and any
related
foreign income taxes, in each sep-
arate ca
tegory for the taxable year of the
foreign
surviving corporation in which the
transa
ction occurs shall be deemed to have
been ac
cumulated after such transaction in
an amou
nt which bears the same ratio to
the und
istributed earnings and profits of
the for
eign surviving corporation for such
taxab
le year (computed without regard to
any ea
rnings and profits carried over) as
the nu
mber of days in the taxable year
after
the date of transaction bears to the
total
number of days in the taxable year.
See,
e.g., §1.381(c)(2)–1(a)(7)Example 2
(ill
ustrating application of this rule with
resp
ect to domestic corporations).
(ii) For purp
oses of determining the
amount of pre
-transaction deficits de-
scribedinpa
ragraphs (d)(2), (e)(1)(iii),
and (e)(2)(
iii) of this section, of a foreign
surviving c
orporation that has a deficit
in earnings
and profits in any separate
category fo
r its taxable year in which the
transacti
on occurs, unless the actual accu-
mulated ea
rnings and profits, or deficit, as
of such dat
e can be shown, such pre-trans-
action def
icit, and any related foreign
income tax
es, shall be deemed to have
accumula
tedinamannersimilartothat
describe
d in paragraph (f)(5)(i) of this
section.
See,e.g., §1.381(c)(2)–1(a)(7)
Example 4
(illustrating application of this
rule with
respect to domestic corpora-
tions).
(g)Effe
ctive date. This section shall
apply to
section 367(b) transactions that
occur on
or after November 6, 2006.
Par. 8. S
ection 1.367(b)–8 is added to
read as f
ollows:
§1.367(
b)–8 Allocation of earnings and
profit
s and foreign income taxes in certain
foreig
n corporate separations.[Reserved]
Par. 9.
Section 1.367(b)–9 is added to
read as
follows:
§1.36
7(b)–9 Special rule for F
reorg
anizations and similar transactions.
(a)Sc
ope.Thissectionappliestoafor-
eign s
ection 381 transaction (as defined in
§1.3
67(b)–7(a)) either—
(i) That is de
scribedinsection
368(a)(1)(F
); or
(ii) That inv
olves—
(A)Atleasto
ne foreign corporation that
holds no prop
erty and has no tax attributes
immediatel
y before the transaction, other
than a nomin
al amount of assets (and re-
lated tax at
tributes) to facilitate its organi-
zation or pr
eserve its existence as a corpo-
ration; and
(B) No more t
han one foreign corpo-
ration that
holds more than a nominal
amount of p
roperty or has more than a
nominal am
ount of tax attributes immedi-
ately befo
re the transaction.
(b)Hoveri
ng deficit rules inappli-
cable.Ifa
transaction is described in
paragraph
(a) of this section, a foreign
survivin
g corporation shall succeed to
earnings
and profits, deficits in earnings
and profi
ts, and foreign income taxes
without r
egard to the hovering deficit
rules of §
1.367(b)–7(d)(2),(e)(1)(iii), and
(e)(2)(i
ii).
(c)Forei
gn divisive transactions.[Re-
served]
(d)Examp
les. The following examples
illustr
ate the principlesof this section:
Example 1.(i)Facts. (A) Foreign corporation
A is and always has been a wholly owned subsidiary
of USP, a
domestic corporation. Foreign corporation
A was incorporated in 1995, and has always had a
calendar taxable year. Foreign corporation A (and all
of its re
spective qualified business units as defined
in section 989) maintains a “u” functional currency.
On December 31, 2006, foreign corporation A has
the fol
lowing post-1986 undistributed earnings and
post-1986 foreign income taxes:
September 11, 20064212006–37 I.R.B.

SeparateCategory:E&PForeignTaxes
Passive(1,000u)
$5
General200u
$200
(800u)
$205
(B) On January 1, 2007, foreign corporation A
moves its place of incorporation from Country 1 to
Country 2 in a reorganization described in section
368(a)(1)(F).
(ii)Result. Under §1.367(b)–7(d), as modified
by paragraph (b) of this section, the pre-transaction
deficit of foreign corporation A will not hover. Ac-
cordingly, foreign surviving corporation has the fol-
lowing post-1986 undistributed earnings and post-
1986 foreign income taxes immediately after the for-
eign section 381 transaction:
S
eparateCategory:E&PForeignTaxes
Passive(1,000u)
$5
General200u
$200
(800u)
$205
Example 2.(i)Facts. (A) Foreign corporations
B, C and D are and always have been wholly owned
subsidiaries of USP, a domestic corporation. Foreign
corporation B was incorporated in 2000 and foreign
corporations C and D were incorporated in 2001. For-
eign corporation B does not own any significant prop-
erty and has no earnings and profits or foreign in-
come taxes accounts. Both foreign corporations C
and D have always had a calendar taxable year. For-
eign corporations C and D (and all of their respec-
tive qualified business units as defined in section 989)
maintain a “u” functional currency. On December 31,
2006, foreign corporations C and D have the follow-
ing post-1986 undistributed earnings and post-1986
foreign income taxes:
F
oreignCorporationC
SeparateCategory:E&PForeignTaxes
Passive(900u)
$50
General(200u)
$100
1100u
$150
F
oreignCorporationD
SeparateCategory:E&PForeignTaxes
Passive1200u
$400
General400u
$100
1600u
$500
(B) On January 1, 2007, USP foreign corporations
C and D merge into foreign corporation B in a reor-
ganization described insection 368(a)(1)(A).
(ii)Result. Although the merger is a foreign sec-
tion 381 transaction involving a foreign corporation
with no property or tax attributes, paragraph (b) of
this section does not apply because more than one
foreign corporation with significant tax attributes is
involved in the foreign section 381 transaction. Ac-
cordingly, under §1.367(b)–7(d), foreign surviving
corporation B has the following post-1986 undis-
tributed earnings and post-1986 foreign income taxes
immediately after the foreign section 381 transaction:
E
arnings&Profits:ForeignTaxes:
SeparateCategory
Positive
E
&PHoveringDeficit
Foreign
Taxes
A
vailable
Foreign Taxes
Associated
with
H
overingDeficit
General1200u(900u)
$400$ 50
Passive400u(200u)
$100$100
1600u(1100u)
$500$150
(d)Effective date. This section shall
apply to section 367(b) transactions that
occur on or after November 6, 2006.
Par. 10. In §1.381(a)–1, paragraph (c)
is revised to read as follows:
§1.381(a)–1 General rule relating
to carryovers in certain corporate
acquisitions.
*****
(c)Foreign corporations. For addi-
tional rules involving foreign corporations,
see §§1.367(b)–7 through 1.367(b)–9.
*****
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for
Services and Enforcement.
Approved July 20, 2006.
Eric Solomon,
Acting Deputy Assistant
Secretary (Tax Policy).
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register for August 7,
2006, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal
Register for August 8, 2006, 71 F.R. 44887)
2006–37 I.R.B.422September 11, 2006

Section 809.—Reduction
in Certain Deductions
of Mutual Life Insurance
Companies
26 CFR 1.809–9: Computation of the differential
earnings rate and the recomputed differential earn-
ings rate.
Mutual life insurance companies;
recomputed differential earnings rate.
The recomputed differential earnings rate
for 2004 is determined for use by mutual
life insurance companies to compute their
income tax liability for 2005.
Rev. Rul. 2006–45
This revenue ruling contains a determi-
nation under § 809 of the Internal Revenue
Code of the “recomputed differential earn-
ings rate” for 2004. This rate is used by
mutual life insurance companies to calcu-
late their federal income tax liability for
taxable years beginning in 2005. Notice
2006–18, 2006–8 I.R.B. 502, contained a
tentative determination of this rate.
The Job Creation and Worker Assis-
tance Act of 2002, Pub. L. 107–147, § 611,
amended § 809 by adding new paragraph
(j). Section 809(j) provides that the differ-
ential earnings rate shall be treated as zero
for purposes of computing both the differ-
ential earnings amount and the recomputed
differential earnings amount for a mutual
life insurance company’s taxable years be-
ginning in 2001, 2002, or 2003.SeeNotice
2002–33, 2002–1 C.B. 989. Subsequently,
the Pension Funding Equity Act of 2004,
Pub. L. 108–218, § 205, repealed § 809 of
the Code for taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2004. Therefore, the Inter-
nal Revenue Service is required to deter-
mine a differential earnings rate for 2004
and a recomputed differential earnings rate
for 2004. The differential earnings rate for
2004 was zero.SeeRev. Rul. 2005–58,
2005–36 I.R.B. 465.
The final determination of the rates is
set forth in Table 1.
Rev. Rul. 2006–45 Table 1
Determination of Rates To Be Used For Taxable Years Beginning in 2005
RecomputedDifferentialearningsratefor2004..............0
Imputedearningsratefor2004.............................4.449
Baseperiodstockearningsrate.............................18.221
Currentstockearningsratefor2004........................4.913
Stockearningsratefor2001...............................2.354
Stockearningsratefor2002...............................-1.876
Stockearningsratefor2003...............................14.261
Averagemutualearningsratefor2004......................10.450
For additional background concerning
the recomputed differential earnings rate,
seeRev. Rul. 2001–33, 2001–2 C.B. 118.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue rul-
ing is Katherine A. Hossofsky of the Office
of the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial
Institutions and Products). For further in-
formation regarding this revenue ruling,
contact Ms. Hossofsky at (202) 622–8435
(not a toll-free call).
Section 3402.—Income Tax
Collected at Source
26 CFR 31.3402(g)–1: Supplemental wage pay-
ments.
T.D. 9276
DEPARTMENT OF
THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 31
Flat Rate Supplemental Wage
Withholding
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service
(IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
SUMMARY: This document contains fi-
nal regulations amending the regulations
that provide for determining the amount of
income tax withholding on supplemental
wages. These regulations apply to all em-
ployers and others making supplemental
wage payments to employees. These regu-
lations reflect changes in the law made by
the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.
DATES:Effective Date:January 1, 2007.
Applicability Date:These regulations
are applicable to payments made on or af-
ter January 1, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT: A. G. Kelley, (202) 622–6040
(not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains amendments
to 26 CFR part 31 under sections 3401 and
3402 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).
Section 904(b) of the American Jobs Cre-
ation Act of 2004 (Public Law 108–357,
118 Stat. 1418) (AJCA) provided for
September 11, 20064232006–37 I.R.B.

mandatory income tax withholding at the
highest rate of income tax in effect un-
der section 1 of the Code to the extent
an employee’s total supplemental wages
paid by the employer exceed $1,000,000
during the calendar year. The AJCA also
provided that the supplemental wages
paid by other businesses under common
control would be taken into account in de-
termining whether the employer has paid
$1,000,000 of supplemental wages to an
employee in the calendar year. In addition,
section 904(a) of the AJCA provided that
the rate for purposes of optional flat rate
withholding on other supplemental wages
(i.e., those supplemental wages not subject
to mandatory flat rate withholding at the
highest rate of income tax) would remain
at 25 percent, but could change if income
tax rates change.
Proposed regulations under sections
3401 and 3402 of the Code were pub-
lished in theFederal Registeron January
5, 2005 (REG–152945–04, 2005–1 C.B.
484 [70 FR 767]). Written and electronic
comments responding to the notice of
proposed rulemaking were received. A
public hearing was held on June 9, 2005.
After consideration of all the comments,
the proposed regulations are adopted as
amended by this Treasury decision.
Summary of Comments and
Explanation of Provisions
The final regulationsreflect a balancing
of two concerns: (1) in accordance with
section 3402(a), procedures for withhold-
ing should have the goal of approximating
the income tax liability of the employee re-
ceiving the wages; and (2) procedures for
income tax withholding should not place
undue administrative burdens on employ-
ers.
Definitions of Regular Wages and
Supplemental Wages
The final regulations have adopted the
definitions of regular wages and supple-
mental wages provided in the proposed
regulations with certain modifications dis-
cussed below. In response to comments on
the proposed regulations, the final regula-
tions also allow an employer to treat cer-
tain wage payments as regular wages or
supplemental wages.
The final regulations, like the proposed
regulations, provide that supplemental
wages include any wages paid by an em-
ployer that are not regular wages. Regular
wages are defined as amounts paid by an
employer for a payroll period either at a
regular hourly rate or in a predetermined
fixed amount. Wages that vary from pay-
roll period to payroll period based on
factors other than the amount of time
worked, such as commissions, tips, and
bonuses, are supplemental wages.
The proposed regulations provided that
a wage payment could qualify as a supple-
mental wage payment only if it was paid
in addition to regular wages paid to the
employee. Many commenters were con-
cerned that the same type of compensation
would be classified as regular or supple-
mental wages depending on whether the
compensation was paid in addition to reg-
ular wages. Commenters also requested
that payments of wages after the termi-
nation of employment be treated as sup-
plemental wages if such payments would
have been treated as supplemental wages
prior to termination. Commenters sug-
gested that characterizing the same type of
compensation differently depending upon
the circumstances upon which the payment
was made unduly complicated payroll ad-
ministration. Commenters also noted that
the proposed regulations did not address
the classification of wage payments if the
employee received two or more types of
payments that would normally be classi-
fied as supplemental wages, but received
no regular wages.
In response to these comments, the final
regulations eliminate the rule that a pay-
ment can qualify as supplemental wages
only if regular wages have been paid to
the employee. Under the final regulations,
payments that satisfy the basic definition
of supplemental wages (i.e., all wage pay-
ments other than regular wage payments)
will be supplemental wages regardless of
whether the employee has received any
regular wages in his or her working ca-
reer with the employer. For example, if
an employee’s compensation from an em-
ployer consists of only income from the
exercise of nonstatutory stock options and
noncash fringe benefits, such wages will
be supplemental wages for federal income
tax withholding purposes. Similarly, if a
retiree is receiving payments of nonqual-
ified deferred compensation made by the
employer or a rabbi trust, such payments
will be supplemental wages regardless of
whether the payments are made in addi-
tion to regular wage payments during ei-
ther that calendar yearor the employee’s
entire career with the employer.
Commenters requested more flexibil-
ity for employers in determining whether
particular types of payments are sup-
plemental wages, such as a facts and
circumstances test, or a default determina-
tion that amounts are supplemental wages
where there is uncertainty regarding the
correct classification of wages as regular
or supplemental wages. Although the fi-
nal regulations do not adopt these specific
suggestions, the final regulations nonethe-
less address these concerns in other ways.
As described below, the final regulations
provide more guidance, compared to the
proposed regulations, regarding the proper
classification of certain types of payments
as regular or supplemental wages. Also,
the final regulations provide employers
with a number of options regarding the
treatment of certain payments that will
simplify compliance with the require-
ment that the employer separately track
the payment of supplemental wages prior
to reaching the threshold for mandatory
flat rate withholding. These features of
the final regulations help to minimize
uncertainties about the classification of
particular wage payments.
Commenters requested guidance on
whether a number of specific types of pay-
ments were regular wages or supplemental
wages, including shift differentials paid to
employees on an hourly basis, payments to
retirees, sick pay, income from restricted
stock awards, income from nonstatutory
stock options exercised by former employ-
ees or retirees, amounts deferred under a
retirement plan pursuant to a salary reduc-
tion agreement or a nonqualified deferred
compensation plan, post-retirement or
post-termination payments of wages that
would have been treated as supplemental
wages if paid prior to the termination of
the employment relationship, and imputed
income amounts for health insurance cov-
erage for non-dependents. The final regu-
lations have provided additional examples
of supplemental wages and regular wages,
including some of the items for which
specific advice was requested. Other
items that are not specifically included in
the final regulations were considered to
be either analogous to items covered or
specifically covered by applicable rules.
2006–37 I.R.B.424September 11, 2006

A commenter requested that employers
be permitted to treat tips, overtime pay,
commissions, third-party sick pay, and tax-
able fringe benefits aseither supplemental
wages or regular wages. The commenter
indicated that many employers have sys-
tems in place that treat such payments as
regular wages and wanted to continue with
such systems. In addition, the commenter
noted that tips are considered to represent
a basic part of the compensation of many
employees and that a tip credit is permit-
ted against the minimum wage for Fair La-
bor Standards Act (FLSA) purposes. Also,
many employees receiving overtime pay
earn such pay each payroll period.
In response to this comment, the final
regulations permit employers to treat tips
and/or overtime pay as regular wages. To
provide employers with more flexibility,
any such treatment is not required to be
applied uniformly to all employees of the
employer.
The final regulations do not allow an
employer to treat commissions, third party
sick pay paid by agents of the employer, or
taxable fringe benefits as anything other
than supplemental wages. Commissions
may vary considerably from pay period
to pay period, have the essential char-
acteristics of supplemental wages, and
have historically been characterized in
the existing regulations as supplemental
wages. A longstanding regulation treats
sick pay paid by an agent of the employer
as supplemental wages and the final reg-
ulations have not amended that regulation
in providing a definition of supplemental
wages. Also, noncash fringe benefits have
been treated as supplemental wages since
withholding requirements with respect to
noncash fringe benefits were set forth in
response to the fringe benefit laws enacted
by the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984. See
Announcement 85–113, 1985–31 I.R.B.
31. With respect to supplemental wage
payments below the threshold for manda-
tory flat rate withholding, employers may
use the aggregate procedure, as described
below, in determining the amount of with-
holding to produce similar withholding
amounts as if the payments were classified
as regular wages.
Procedures for Withholding on
Supplemental Wages
These regulations also interpret provi-
sions of the AJCA relating to the taxation
of supplemental wages.
Procedures for Withholding on
Supplemental Wages of $1,000,000 or
Less During a Calendar Year
The final regulations continue to pro-
vide that, if an employee has not received
cumulatively more than $1,000,000 of
supplemental wages during the calendar
year, generally there are two procedures
available to an employer in withholding
on a payment of supplemental wages: (1)
the aggregate procedure and (2) optional
flat rate withholding. Under the aggre-
gate procedure, employers calculate the
amount of withholding due by aggregating
the amount of supplemental wages with
the regular wages paid for the current pay-
roll period or for the most recent payroll
period of the year of the payment, and
treating the aggregate as if it were a sin-
gle wage payment for the regular payroll
period.
Optional flat rate withholding on sup-
plemental wages (of $1,000,000 or less
cumulatively) allows employers to disre-
gard the amount of regular wages paid to
an employee as well as the withholding
allowances claimed by an employee on
Form W–4, “Employee’s Withholding Al-
lowance Certificate,” and use a flat per-
centage rate specifiedin the regulations
in calculating the amount of withholding.
The final regulations, like existing regula-
tions and revenue rulings, continue to pro-
vide that optional flat rate withholding on
supplemental wages is generally available
only if (1) the employer has withheld in-
come tax from regular wages paid the em-
ployee, and (2) the supplemental wages are
either (a) not paid concurrently with reg-
ular wages or (b) separately stated on the
payroll records of the employer.
Commenters requested that employers
be allowed to use optional flat rate with-
holding with respect to such payments to
a former employee even if no other pay-
ments of wages were being made to the
employee during that calendar year. Com-
menters believed that the requirement that
income tax must have been withheld from
the regular wages of the employee was
unduly restrictive and noted that employ-
ers may have difficulty in obtaining Forms
W–4 from individuals who were no longer
employees.
However, eliminating the requirement
that income tax must have been withheld
from regular wages paid to the employee in
order for optional flat rate withholding to
be available to the employer would exac-
erbate the problem of overwithholding on
wages paid to employees. Therefore, the
final regulations have retained the rule that
income tax must have been withheld from
the regular wages of the employee in or-
der for optional flat rate withholding to be
available to employers. The final regula-
tions clarify that the income tax withhold-
ing requirement will be satisfied if income
tax has been withheld from regular wages
paid during the same year as the payment
of supplemental wages or during the pre-
ceding calendar year. The final regulations
continue to provide that if the supplemen-
tal wage payment is paid under the condi-
tions permitting the use of optional flat rate
withholding, the decision whether to use
optional flat rate withholding rather than
the aggregate procedure is discretionary
with the employer.
Procedures for Withholding on
Supplemental Wages in Excess of
$1,000,000 Paid to One Employee in One
Calendar Year
The AJCA established different with-
holding rules for supplemental wages in
excess of $1,000,000 received by an em-
ployee from an employer during a calen-
dar year. The AJCA provided that, effec-
tive January 1, 2005, employers must with-
hold from supplemental wages in excess of
$1,000,000 at the highest income tax rate
under section 1 of the Code.
The final regulations provide that if
the sum of a supplemental wage payment
and all other supplemental wage payments
paid by an employer to an employee dur-
ing the calendar year exceeds $1,000,000,
the withholding rate on the supplemental
wages in excess of $1,000,000 shall be
equal to the maximum rate of tax in effect
under section 1 for taxable years beginning
in such calendar year. The maximum rate
of tax in effect for taxable years beginning
in 2005 is 35 percent. Thus, the mandatory
flat rate for supplemental wages in excess
of $1 million in a given taxable year is 35
September 11, 20064252006–37 I.R.B.

percent and will remain at 35 percent until
income tax rates change.
1
Comments on Method for Withholding on
Wages over $1,000,000
Many commenters expressed concern
that the mandatory flat rate withholding
requirements would force them to iden-
tify whether every wage payment was a
regular wage or a supplemental wage and
to track all supplemental wages paid to
determine whether mandatory flat rate
withholding applied. Under prior law,
treating any wage payment as a supple-
mental wage was optional for employers,
and many employers withheld on supple-
mental wages under the aggregate proce-
dure and thus were not required to identify
whether payments were regular wages or
supplemental wages. Commenters were
concerned about the cost and burden of
implementing a system to track whether
payments were regular wages or supple-
mental wages, especially if only a few
employees would have wages subject to
mandatory flat rate withholding. While
the IRS and Treasury Department appre-
ciate the potential burden created by the
need to distinguish between regular and
supplemental wages in order to comply
with the requirements of section 904(b)
of the AJCA, section 904(b) mandates
flat rate withholding only for supplemen-
tal wages in excess of $1,000,000. The
IRS and Treasury Department request ad-
ditional comments on how any burden
could be mitigated while taking into ac-
count the scope of section 904(b) and the
rules provided in section 3402 of the Code
which describe the circumstances under
which employees provide withholding ex-
emption certificates, and employers must
follow them in implementing withhold-
ing. For example, the IRS and Treasury
Department are interested in views on
whether it should permit employers to
withhold at the mandatory flat rate on any
amount of total wages (both regular and
supplemental) thatexceeds $1,000,000.
Special Rules for Determining
Applicability of Mandatory Flat
Rate Withholding
A commenter also requested that an
employer be permitted to treat any sup-
plemental wage payment as subject to
mandatory flat rate withholding whenever
it is anticipated the employee’s supple-
mental wages for the year are approaching
the $1,000,000 threshold. To address
these concerns, the final regulations and
the revenue procedure provide employers
with a number of options in determining
whether supplemental wages in excess of
$1,000,000 have been paid to an employee
during the calendar year.
One commenter suggested that guid-
ance was needed as to the calculation of
the amount of noncash fringe benefits
to be included in supplemental wages
for purposes of determining whether the
$1,000,000 threshold for mandatory flat
rate withholding has been reached. With
respect to the determination of the amount
of supplemental wages for purposes of the
mandatory flat rate withholding, the regu-
lations are not intended to require different
calculations of the amount of wages than
would normally apply in determining the
amount of wages subject to withholding.
Thus, currently applicable procedures for
the calculation of noncash fringe bene-
fits of an employee (see Announcement
85–113, which provides employers with
special accounting rules that they may use
to determine the amount of noncash fringe
benefits that are wages subject to income
tax withholding) will continue to apply in
determining the amount of supplemental
wages for purposes of the mandatory flat
rate withholding. If the noncash fringe
benefit amounts are not wages subject to
income tax withholding, then they are not
included in regular wages or supplemental
wages.
A commenter suggested that specific
guidance was needed concerning whether
disqualifying dispositions of shares of
stock acquired pursuant to the exercise of
statutory stock options are taken into ac-
count as supplemental wages for purposes
of determining whether the $1,000,000
threshold has been reached. Such income
is not wages subject to federal income
tax withholding. The final regulations
specifically provide that income from
disqualifying dispositions of shares of
stock acquired pursuant to the exercise of
statutory stock options is not included in
supplemental wages.
A commenter also requested that, for
purposes of determining whether an em-
ployee has received $1,000,000 of supple-
mental wages, an employer should be al-
lowedtotreatamountsincludedinBox1
of Form W–2, “Wage and Tax Statement”
as “wages, tips, other compensation” as
supplemental wages. Items reportable in
Box 1 of Form W–2 include items that
are not subject to income tax withholding.
Nevertheless, in the interest of making the
rules administrable for employers, the reg-
ulations provide that employers can treat
such amounts as supplemental wages.
A commenter requested that, in deter-
mining whether the employee has received
$1,000,000 of supplemental wages, em-
ployers should be allowed to take into ac-
count the gross amount of a supplemen-
tal wage payment including any pretax de-
ductions that are attributable to such sup-
plemental wages. However, pretax de-
ductions, including salary reduction defer-
rals, are not includible in gross income for
the taxable year and are not wages sub-
ject to income tax withholding. Therefore,
the IRS and Treasury Department have not
adopted this proposal.
Mandatory flat rate withholding applies
only to the excess of supplemental wages
over $1,000,000 received by an employee
from an employer, taking into considera-
tion all payments of supplemental wages
made by an employer to an employee.
Therefore, the new mandatory flat rate
withholding on supplemental wages in
excess of $1,000,000 can apply to all of a
payment or only a portion of the payment.
The proposed regulations provided that
if a particular supplemental wage pay-
ment results in an employee exceeding the
$1,000,000 supplemental wage threshold,
mandatory flat rate withholding will apply
to the extent that the payment together
with other supplemental wage payments
previously made to the employee during
the year is in excess of $1,000,000. Be-
cause this provision could result in an
employer having to treat two portions
of a single supplemental wage payment
1
Under the sunset provision in section 901 of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, the mandatory flat rate will change to 39.6 percent for taxable years beginning
after December 31, 2010.
2006–37 I.R.B.426September 11, 2006

under different withholding regimes, com-
menters requested that employers be per-
mitted to elect to treat the entire amount of
the payment that results in supplemental
wage payments to the employee exceed-
ing $1,000,000 as subject to mandatory
flat rate withholding. Commenters also
requested that to avoid having the manda-
tory flat rate withholding apply only to the
portion of a supplemental wage payment
that exceeds $1,000,000, employers be al-
lowed to apply the mandatory rate only to
payments after the payment which causes
the employee to have received $1,000,000
or more of supplemental wages.
The IRS and Treasury Department con-
cluded this latter approach could not be
reconciled with the statute. Section 904(b)
of the AJCA provides that “if the supple-
mental wage payment, when added to all
such payments previously made by the em-
ployer to the employee during the calen-
dar year, exceeds $1,000,000, the rate used
with respect to such excess shall be equal
to the maximum rate of tax....” Accord-
ingly, the final regulations continue with
the rule that, if a supplemental wage pay-
ment results in the total supplemental wage
payments to the employee from the em-
ployer during the calendar year exceeding
$1,000,000, the amount of that payment in
excess of $1,000,000 (when added to the
supplemental wage payments previously
made in the calendar year) is subject to
mandatory flat rate withholding. The final
regulations, however, permit employers to
treat the entire amount of the payment that
results in the employee receiving total sup-
plemental wages of more than $1,000,000
as subject to mandatory flat rate withhold-
ing. This treatment can apply on an em-
ployee-by-employee basis.
A commenter requested that guidance
be provided as to the calculation of supple-
mental wages for purposes of determining
the applicability of mandatory flat rate
withholding in a situation where salary
reduction deferral amounts are deferred
from either gross regular wage payments
or gross supplemental wage payments to
the employee. The commenters requested
flexibility in allocating such deferrals.
However, in order to apply mandatory
flat rate withholding on a consistent ba-
sis, payments of wages must be correctly
identified as either regular wages or sup-
plemental wages. Therefore, the final
regulations provide that, in determining
the amount of supplemental wages paid,
salary deferral amounts are allocated to
the gross regular wage payments or to
the gross supplemental wage payments
from which they are actually deducted.
For example, if an employee had a valid
salary reduction agreement deferring 10
percent of all salary and bonuses, and
the employee had received wage pay-
ments based on $1,500,000 of gross salary
and $1,000,000 of gross bonuses prior
to reduction for the deferrals (and no
other wages), the employer would allo-
cate $150,000 to the gross regular wage
payment and $100,000 to the gross supple-
mental wage payment. Thus, for purposes
of the mandatory flat rate withholding, the
example employee has received $900,000
of supplemental wages.
Taking into Account Payments by Agents
of Employers in Determining Applicability
of Mandatory Flat Rate Withholding
In determining whether the supple-
mental wages paid by an employer to an
employee in a given taxable year exceed
$1,000,000, the proposed regulations pro-
vided that an employer (the first employer)
must consider wage payments made to the
employee by any other person treated as
a single employer with the first employer
under section 52(a) or 52(b). Further-
more, if an employer enlists a third party
to make a payment to an employee on the
employer’s behalf, the payment will be
considered as made by the employer even
though it may have been delivered to the
employee by the third party.
Commenters expressed the view that
employers should not be required to count
supplemental wage payments made by
third party agents in determining whether
the $1,000,000 supplemental wage thresh-
old has been met. Although the AJCA did
not specifically address whether supple-
mental wage payments made by employers
through agents must be considered in de-
termining the applicability of mandatory
flat rate withholding, requiring that such
wages be taken into account is consistent
with the purpose of the legislation to im-
pose income tax withholding on a basis
that is more consistent with income tax
liability. Failure to consider payments
made by agents of an employer would cre-
ate an inconsistency in the application of
mandatory flat rate withholding based on
the type of payment systems that employ-
ers choose to put in place. Thus, the final
regulations retain the rule of the proposed
regulations requiring that payments made
by agents of the employers must be con-
sidered in determining the applicability of
mandatory flat rate withholding (with the
exception of certain payments discussed
below).
A commenter requested that common
law employers be allowed to disregard
payments made by agents if the payments
would be unlikely to trigger the manda-
tory flat rate withholding. The commenter
noted the administrative burden imposed
if a third party agent were required to co-
ordinate every payment with the employer
to determine whether the employee has re-
ceived $1,000,000 of supplemental wages.
The commenter requested that agents
be allowed to presume that mandatory
flat rate withholding does not apply until
year-to-date payments that they them-
selves make to a particular worker exceed
$100,000. Also, the commenter requested
that employers be allowed to presume
that the mandatory flat rate withholding
does not apply until year-to-date payments
that the employer makes to a particular
worker, without regard to payments made
by a third party payer, exceed $500,000.
In order to provide relief with respect
to payments made by agents, the final reg-
ulations provide ade minimisrule excep-
tion. An agent making total wage pay-
ments, including regular and supplemen-
tal wages, of less than $100,000 to an indi-
vidual in any calendar year may disregard
other supplemental wages from the com-
mon law employer or any other agent of
the employer that would subject the em-
ployee to mandatory flat rate withhold-
ing. Similarly, an employer may disre-
gard supplemental wage payments made
by an agent to an employee in determin-
ing whether the employee has reached the
$1,000,000 threshold if the agent has made
total wage payments of less than $100,000
to the employee during the calendar year.
If an agent does reach the $100,000 thresh-
old of wages paid to a single employee
in a calendar year, then the employer, in
determining the applicability of manda-
tory flat rate withholding, must take into
account all supplemental wages paid by
the agent in determining whether manda-
tory flat rate withholding applies to a wage
payment made after the agent reaches the
September 11, 20064272006–37 I.R.B.

$100,000 threshold. Similarly, with the
payment that reaches the $100,000 thresh-
old, the agent who has made $100,000 of
wage payments to an employee during a
calendar year, is required to take into ac-
count all wages paid by the employer and
any other agent of the employer who has
reached the $100,000 threshold in deter-
mining the applicability of mandatory flat
rate withholding. Thisde minimisrule
is subject to an anti-abuse rule, in that it
does not apply to the employer in situa-
tions where the employer has created an
arrangement or arrangements with five or
more agents if a principal effect of the ar-
rangement or arrangements is to reduce ap-
plicable mandatory flat rate withholding
with respect to an employee. Application
of thede minimisrule is optional. An em-
ployer may take into account all supple-
mental wages paid by agents, regardless of
how small the payments are from any par-
ticular agent, in determining whether the
employee has received $1,000,000 of sup-
plemental wages during the calendar year.
Similarly, an agent is not required to apply
thede minimisrule.
Rates Applicable for Purposes of Optional
Flat Rate Withholding
The final regulations change the op-
tional flat rate withholding on supplemen-
tal wages to provide that the 20 percent
rate applies only to supplemental wages
paid prior to January 1, 1994. The rate of
28 percent applies to supplemental wages
paid after December 31, 1993, and on or
before August 6, 2001. The Revenue Rec-
onciliation Act of 1993, as amended by
the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Rec-
onciliation Act of 2001, provides that the
supplemental withholding rate shall not be
less than the third lowest rate of tax ap-
plicable under section 1(c) of the Code for
wages paid after August 6, 2001, and be-
fore January 1, 2005. Consistent with this
amendment, the regulations provide that
the rate of 27.5 percent applies to supple-
mental wages paid after August 6, 2001,
and on or before December 31, 2001, the
rate of 27 percent applies to wages paid af-
ter December 31, 2001, and on or before
May 27, 2003, and the rate of 25 percent
applies to wages paid after May 27, 2003,
and on or before December 31, 2004.
One commenter suggested that optional
flat rate withholding for wages paid after
December 31, 2002, and on or before May
27, 2003, should be 25 percent. The law
in effect at the time as enacted by the Eco-
nomic Growth and Tax Relief Reconcili-
ation Act of 2001 provided that the sup-
plemental withholding rate “shall not be
less than the third lowest rate of tax ap-
plicable under section 1(c) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986.” The commenter
stated that the optional flat rate withhold-
ing should be 25 percent because the Jobs
and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act
of 2003 provided that the third lowest rate
of tax under section 1(c) of the Code after
December 31, 2002, would be 25 percent.
However, this provision changing the third
lowest rate of income tax rate to 25 per-
cent was not enacted into law until May
28, 2003. Thus, at the time of payments
of supplemental wages made after Decem-
ber 31, 2002, and prior to May 28, 2003,
the third lowest rate of tax under section
1(c) was 27 percent. As noted in the pre-
amble to the proposed regulations, the IRS
and Treasury Department believe that the
27 percent rate for this period is consistent
with the general principle that the employ-
ment taxation of wage payments is deter-
mined based on the rates in effect at the
date the wages are paid.United States v.
Cleveland Indians Baseball Co., 532 U.S.
200 (2001). Therefore, the final regula-
tions continue to provide that the optional
flat rate withholding for wages paid after
December 31, 2002, and prior to May 28,
2003, was 27 percent.
For 2006, the optional flat rate with-
holding for supplemental wages of
$1,000,000 or less in a given taxable
year is 25 percent. The optional flat rate
withholding will remain at 25 percent until
income tax rates change.
2
Application of Mandatory Flat Rate
Withholding Regardless of Employee’s
Personal Income Tax Liability
Commenters requested that the final
regulations provide an exception from
mandatory flat rate withholding when
the employee receiving the supplemental
wage amount will be eligible to take an off-
setting income tax credit or an offsetting
income tax deduction, but no exception
from the definition of wages for income
tax withholding purposes applies. Com-
menters noted that some foreign countries
impose foreign income tax but not foreign
income tax withholding on supplemental
wage payments made to United States
employeeswhoarebasedinandworking
in those foreign countries. If an employer
is not required by foreign law to withhold
foreign income tax from a supplemental
wage payment, the exception from wages
provided by section 3401(a)(8)(A)(ii) of
the Code does not apply. However, the
payment may be subject to foreign income
tax and the employee may be eligible for a
foreign income tax credit that could offset
any liability for United States income tax.
The commenters requested that the reg-
ulations provide an exception for United
States residents or citizens who are work-
ing overseas and receive supplemental
wage payments that are subject to foreign
income tax, but not foreign income tax
withholding.
Another commenter noted that an em-
ployee may be required by the terms of
a divorce decree to pay the entire amount
of a bonus to a former spouse and may
be eligible to take an alimony deduction
with respect to the transfer to the former
spouse. This commenter suggested that
the IRS and Treasury Department create
an administrative exception from manda-
tory flat rate withholding that would apply
if the employee submits a Form W–4 es-
tablishing that the employee will be enti-
tled to an offsetting income tax deduction
with respect to the supplemental wage pay-
ment.
In enacting the requirement for manda-
tory flat rate withholding, Congress made
clear its intent to override the withholding
that would apply pursuant to the em-
ployee’s elections on the Form W–4 with
withholding at a specific statutorily pre-
scribed rate. To provide exceptions for
tax credits or deductions that an employee
would expect to receive would require the
employer to give the employee’s Form
W–4 or some other document from the
employee precedence over the statutory
mandate. Moreover, although the com-
2
Under current law, section 1(i)(2) will not be applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2010, pursuant to the sunset provisions contained in section 901 of the Economic
Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (Public Law 107–16; 115 Stat. 150). See also section 107 of Public Law 108–27 (117 Stat. 755). Absent legislative action, the optional
flat rate will change to 28 percent in 2011.
2006–37 I.R.B.428September 11, 2006

menters are suggesting limiting the excep-
tions to circumstances in which specific
credible claims for credits or deductions
can be made, implementation of such
proposals would require the employer to
vet claims made by individual employees
about their tax circumstances. The IRS
and Treasury Department decline to adopt
the suggestions made by the commenters
because they are contrary to statutory in-
tent and would require the employer to
assume a role in assessing employees’ tax
circumstances that employers cannot and
should not be asked to perform.
Effective Date of Regulations
Many commenters stated that making
the changes to their payroll systems nec-
essary to comply with mandatory flat rate
withholding would take time and require
testing. Of particular concern was the co-
ordination of payments by agents. In re-
sponse to these comments, the final reg-
ulations will be effective with respect to
wages paid on or after January 1, 2007.
This will give employers time to imple-
ment any programming and coordination
required by the final regulations.
A commenter also asked for permanent
relief from mandatory flat rate withhold-
ing and related reporting and withholding
penalties and interest if the employer (or
third party payer) makes reasonable, good
faith efforts to comply with the new re-
quirements. Because Congress established
this withholding as mandatory, it would be
inconsistent with the statute to provide per-
manent relief from liability for the manda-
tory flat rate withholding.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that these fi-
nal regulations are not a significant regu-
latory action as defined in Executive Order
12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment
is not required. It has also been determined
that section 553(b) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does
not apply to these regulations, and because
the regulation does not impose a collection
of information on small entities, the Regu-
latory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6)
does not apply, and therefore, a Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis is not required. Pur-
suant to section 7805(f) of the Code, the
proposed regulations preceding these reg-
ulations were submitted to the Chief Coun-
sel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on the impact
on small business.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regula-
tions is A. G. Kelley, Office of Division
Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Ex-
empt and Government Entities). However,
other personnel from the IRS and Treasury
Department participated in their develop-
ment.
*****
Adoption of Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 31 is
amended as follows:
PART 31—EMPLOYMENT TAXES
AND COLLECTION OF INCOME TAX
AT SOURCE
Paragraph 1. The authority citation to
part 31 is amended by adding an entry in
numerical order to read as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805* * *
Section 31.3402(n)–1 also issued under
26 U.S.C. 6001, 6011 and 6364. * * *
Par.2.Section 31.3401(a)–1
is amended by revising paragraph
(b)(8)(i)(b)(2) to read as follows:
§31.3401(a)–1 Wages
*****
(b) * * *
(8) * * *
(i) * * *
(b)***
(2) Payments made by agents subject to
this paragraph are supplemental wages as
defined in §31.3402(g)–1, and are there-
fore subject to the rules regarding with-
holding tax on supplemental wages pro-
vided in §31.3402(g)–1. For purposes of
those rules, unless the agent is also an
agent for purposes of withholding tax from
the employee’s regular wages, the agent
may deem tax to have been withheld from
regular wages paid to the employee during
the calendar year.
*****
Par. 3. Section 31.3401(a)–4 is
amended by revising paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
§31.3401(a)–4 Reimbursements and other
expense allowance amounts.
*****
(c)Withholding rate. Payments made
under reimbursement or other expense
allowance arrangements that are subject
to income tax withholding are supplemen-
tal wages as defined in §31.3402(g)–1.
Accordingly, withholding on such supple-
mental wages is calculated under the rules
provided with respect to supplemental
wages in §31.3402(g)–1.
*****
Par. 4. Section 31.3402(g)–1 is
amended by:
1. Revising paragraph (a).
2. Adding a sentence at the beginning
of paragraph (b)(1).
3. Revising paragraph (b)(2).
The revisions and addition read as fol-
lows:
§31.3402(g)–1 Supplemental wage
payments.
(a)In general and withholding
on supplemental wages in excess of
$1,000,000—(1)Determination of sup-
plemental wages and regular wages—(i)
Supplemental wages. An employee’s re-
muneration may consist of regular wages
and supplemental wages. Supplemental
wages are all wages paid by an employer
that are not regular wages. Supplemen-
tal wages include wage payments made
without regard to an employee’s payroll
period, but also may include payments
made for a payroll period. Examples of
wage payments that are included in sup-
plemental wages include reported tips
(except as provided in paragraph (a)(1)(v)
of this section), overtime pay (except as
provided in paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of this
section), bonuses, back pay, commissions,
wages paid under reimbursement or other
expense allowance arrangements, non-
qualified deferred compensation includi-
ble in wages, wages paid as noncash fringe
benefits, sick pay paid by a third party as
an agent of the employer, amounts that are
includible in gross income under section
409A, income recognized on the exer-
cise of a nonstatutory stock option, wages
from imputed income for health coverage
for a non-dependent, and wage income
recognized on the lapse of a restriction
on restricted propertytransferred from an
September 11, 20064292006–37 I.R.B.

employer to an employee. Amounts that
are described as supplemental wages in
this definition are supplemental wages re-
gardless of whether the employer has paid
the employee any regular wages during
either the calendar year of the payment or
any prior calendar year. Thus, for exam-
ple, if the only wages that an employer has
ever paid an employee are payments of
noncash fringe benefits and income rec-
ognized on the exercise of a nonstatutory
stock option, such payments are classified
as supplemental wages.
(ii)Regular wages. As distinguished
from supplemental wages, regular wages
are amounts that are paid at a regular
hourly, daily, or similar periodic rate (and
not an overtime rate) for the current payroll
period or at a predetermined fixed deter-
minable amount for the current payroll
period. Thus, among other things, wages
that vary from payroll period to payroll pe-
riod (such as commissions, reported tips,
bonuses, or overtime pay) are not regular
wages, except that an employer may treat
tips as regular wages under paragraph
(a)(1)(v) of this section and an employer
may treat overtime pay as regular wages
under paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of this section.
(iii)Amounts that are not wages subject
to income tax withholding.Ifanamount
of remuneration is not wages subject to in-
come tax withholding, it is neither regu-
lar wages nor supplemental wages. Thus,
for example, income from the disqualify-
ing dispositions of shares of stock acquired
pursuant to the exercise of statutory stock
options, as described in section 421(b), is
not included in regular wages or supple-
mental wages.
(iv)Optional treatment of overtime pay
as regular wages. Employers may treat
overtime pay as regular wages rather than
supplemental wages. For this purpose,
overtime payis defined as any pay required
to be paid pursuant to federal (Fair Labor
Standards Act), state, or local governmen-
tal laws at a rate higher than the normal
wage rate of the employee because the em-
ployee has worked hours in excess of the
number of hours deemed to constitute a
normal work week or work day.
(v)Optional treatment of tips as regular
wages. Employers may treat tips as regu-
lar wages rather than supplemental wages.
For this purpose, tips are defined as includ-
ing all tips which are reported to the em-
ployer pursuant to section 6053.
(vi)Amount to be withheld. The cal-
culation of the amount of the income tax
withholding with respect to supplemental
wage payments is provided for under para-
graph (a)(2) through (a)(7) of this section.
(2)Mandatory flat rate withholding.
If a supplemental wage payment, when
added to all supplemental wage payments
previously made by one employer (as de-
fined in paragraph (a)(3) of this section)
to an employee during the calendar year,
exceeds $1,000,000, the rate used in de-
termining the amount of withholding on
the excess (including any excess which
is a portion of a supplemental wage pay-
ment) shall be equal to the highest rate
of tax applicable under section 1 for such
taxable years beginning in such calen-
dar year. This flat rate shall be applied
without regard to whether income tax
has been withheld from the employee’s
regular wages, without allowance for
the number of withholding allowances
claimed by the employee on Form W–4,
“Employee’s Withholding Allowance Cer-
tificate,” without regard to whether the
employee has claimed exempt status on
Form W–4, without regard to whether the
employee has requested additional with-
holding on Form W–4, and without regard
to the withholding method used by the em-
ployer. Withholding under this paragraph
(a)(2) is mandatory flat rate withholding.
(3)Certain persons treated as one em-
ployer—(i)Persons under common con-
trol. For purposes of paragraph (a)(2) of
this section, all persons treated as a sin-
gle employer under subsection (a) or (b) of
section 52 shall be treated as one employer.
(ii)Agents. For purposes of paragraph
(a)(2) of this section, any payment made
to an employee by a third party acting as
an agent for the employer (regardless of
whether such person shall have been des-
ignated as an agent pursuant to section
3504) shall be considered as made by the
employer except as provided in paragraph
(a)(4)(iii) of this section.
(4)Treatment of certain items in de-
termining applicability of mandatory flat
rate withholding—(i)Optional treatment
of compensation not subject to income tax
withholding. For purposes of paragraph
(a)(2) of this section, employers may de-
termine whether an employee has received
$1,000,000 of supplemental wages during
a calendar year by including in supplemen-
tal wages amounts includible in income
but not subject to withholding that are re-
ported as wages, tips, other compensation
on Form W–2.
(ii)Allocation of salary reduction de-
ferrals. In allocating salary reduction
deferral amounts excludable from wages
for purposes of determining whether the
employer has paid $1,000,000 of sup-
plemental wages under paragraph (a)(2)
of this section, employers must allocate
such salary reduction deferral amounts
to the type of compensation (i.e.,gross
amounts of regular wage payments or
gross amounts of supplemental wage pay-
ments) actually being deferred.
(iii)Optional de minimis exception
for certain payments by agents.Forpur-
poses of paragraph (a)(2) of this section,
if an agent makes total wage payments
(including regular wages and supplemen-
tal wages) of less than $100,000 to an
individual during any calendar year, an
employer or other agent may disregard
such payments in determining whether
the individual has received $1,000,000 of
supplemental wages during the calendar
year, and such agent need not consider
whether the individual has received other
supplemental wages in determining the
amount of income tax to be withheld from
the payments. An employer may not avail
itself of this exception if the employer is
making payments to the employee using
five or more agentsand a principal ef-
fect of such use of agents is to reduce the
applicability of mandatory flat rate with-
holding to the employee. For purposes of
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, if an agent
makes total wage payments of $100,000 or
more to an individual during any calendar
year, the entire amount of supplemental
wages paid by the agent during the calen-
dar year to the employee must be taken
into account (by other agents of the em-
ployer that make total wage payments to
the employee of $100,000 or more, by the
agent, and by the employer for which the
agent is acting) in determining whether
the employee has received $1,000,000 of
supplemental wages.
(iv)Treatment of supplemental wage
payment exceeding $1,000,000 cumulative
threshold. In the case of a supplemen-
tal wage payment that, when added to all
supplemental wage payments previously
made by the employer to the employee in
the calendar year, results in the employee
having received in excess of $1,000,000
2006–37 I.R.B.430September 11, 2006

supplemental wages for the calendar year,
the employer is required to impose with-
holding under paragraph (a)(2) of this sec-
tion only on the portion of the payment
that is in excess of $1,000,000 (taking into
account all prior supplemental wage pay-
ments during the year). However, an em-
ployer may subject the entire amount of
such supplemental wage payment to the
withholding imposed by paragraph (a)(2)
of this section.
(5)Withholding on supplemental wages
that are not subject to mandatory flat rate
withholding. To the extent that paragraph
(a)(2) of this section does not apply to a
supplemental wage payment (or a portion
of a payment), the amount of the tax re-
quired to be withheld on the supplemental
wages when paid shall be determined un-
der the rules provided in paragraphs (a)(6)
and (7) of this section.
(6)Aggregate procedure for withhold-
ing on supplemental wages—(i)Appli-
cability. The employer is required to
determine withholding upon supplemen-
tal wages under this paragraph (a)(6) if
paragraph (a)(2) of this section does not
apply to the payment or portion of the
payment and if paragraph (a)(7) of this
section may not be used with respect to
the payment. In addition, employers have
the option of using this paragraph (a)(6)
to calculate withholding with respect to a
supplemental wage payment, if paragraph
(a)(2) of this section does not apply to the
payment, but if paragraph (a)(7) of this
section could be used with respect to the
payment.
(ii)Procedure. Provided this procedure
applies under paragraph (a)(6)(i) of this
section, the supplemental wages, if paid
concurrently with wages for a payroll pe-
riod, are aggregated with the wages paid
for such payroll period. If not paid con-
currently, the supplemental wages are ag-
gregated with the wages paid or to be paid
within the same calendar year for the last
preceding payroll period or for the cur-
rent payroll period, if any. The amount
oftaxtobewithheldisdeterminedasif
the aggregate of the supplemental wages
and the regular wages constituted a sin-
gle wage payment for the regular payroll
period. The withholding method used by
the employer with respect to regular wages
would then be used to calculate the with-
holding on this single wage payment and
the employer would take into considera-
tion the Form W–4 submitted by the em-
ployee. This procedure is the aggregate
procedure for withholding on supplemen-
tal wages.
(7)Optional flat rate withholding on
supplemental wages—(i)Applicability.
The employer may determine withholding
upon supplemental wages under this para-
graph (a)(7) if three conditions are met—
(A) Paragraph (a)(2) of this section does
not apply to the payment or the portion of
the payment;
(B) The supplemental wages are either
not paid concurrently with regular wages
or are separately stated on the payroll
records of the employer; and
(C) Income tax has been withheld from
regular wages of the employee during the
calendar year of the payment or the preced-
ing calendar year.
(ii)Procedure. The determination of
the tax to be withheld under paragraph
(a)(7)(iii) of this section is made without
reference to any payment of regular wages,
without allowance for the number of with-
holding allowances claimed by the em-
ployee on Form W–4, and without regard
to whether the employee has requested ad-
ditional withholding on Form W–4. With-
holding under this procedure is optional
flat rate withholding.
(iii)Rate applicable for purposes of op-
tional flat rate withholding. Provided the
conditions of paragraph (a)(7)(i) of this
section have been met, the employer may
determine the tax to be withheld—
(A) From supplemental wages paid af-
ter April 30, 1966, and prior to January 1,
1994, by using a flat percentage rate of 20
percent;
(B) From supplemental wages paid af-
ter December 31, 1993, and on or before
August 6, 2001, by using a flat percentage
rate of 28 percent;
(C) From supplemental wages paid af-
ter August 6, 2001, and on or before De-
cember 31, 2001, by using a flat percent-
age rate of 27.5 percent;
(D) From supplemental wages paid af-
ter December 31, 2001, and on or before
May 27, 2003, by using a flat percentage
rate of 27 percent;
(E) From supplemental wages paid after
May 27, 2003, and on or before December
31, 2004, by using a flat percentage rate of
25 percent; and
(F) From supplemental wages paid af-
ter December 31, 2004, by using a flat
percentage rate of 28 percent (or the cor-
responding rate in effect under section
1(i)(2) for taxable years beginning in the
calendar year in which the payment is
made).
(8)Examples. For purposes of these ex-
amples, it is assumed that the rate for pur-
poses of mandatory flat rate withholding
for 2007 is 35 percent, and the rate for pur-
poses of optional flat rate withholding for
2007 is 25 percent. The following exam-
ples illustrate this paragraph (a):
Example 1. (i) Employee A is an employee of
three entities (X, Y, and Z) that are treated as a single
employer under section 52(a) or (b). In 2007, X pays
regular wages to A on a monthly payroll period for
services performed for X, Y, and Z. The regular wages
are paid on the third business day of each month. In-
come tax is withheld from the regular wages of A
during the year. A receives only the following sup-
plemental wage payments during 2007 in addition to
the regular wages paid by X—
(A) A bonus of $600,000 from X on March 15,
2007;
(B) A bonus of $2,300,000 from Y on November
15, 2007; and
(C) A bonus of $10,000 from Z on December 31,
2007.
(ii) In thisExample 1, the $600,000 bonus from
X is a supplemental wage payment. The withhold-
ing on the $600,000 payment from X could be de-
termined under either paragraph (a)(6) or (7) of this
section because income tax has been withheld from
the regular wages of A. If X elects to use the ag-
gregate procedure under paragraph(a)(6)ofthissec-
tion, the amount of withholding on the supplemental
wages would be based on aggregating the supplemen-
tal wages and the regular wages paid by X either for
the current or last payroll period and treating the to-
tal of the regular wages paid by X and the $600,000
supplemental wages as a single wage payment for a
regular payroll period. The withholding method used
by the employer with respect to regular wages would
then be used to calculate the withholding on this sin-
gle wage payment, and the employer would take into
consideration the Form W–4 furnished by the em-
ployee.
(iii) In thisExample 1, the $2,300,000 bonus
from Y is a supplemental wage payment. To calcu-
late the withholding on the $2,300,000 supplemental
wage payment from Y, the $600,000 of supplemen-
tal wages X has already paid to A in 2007 must
be taken into account because X and Y are treated
as the same employer under section 52(a) or (b).
Thus, the withholding on the first $400,000 of the
payment (i.e., the cumulative supplemental wages
not in excess of $1,000,000) is computed separately
from the withholding on the remaining $1,900,000
of the payment (i.e., the amount of the cumulative
supplemental wages in excess of $1,000,000). With
respect to the first $400,000, the withholding could
be computed under either paragraph (a)(6) or (a)(7)
of this section, because income tax has been withheld
from the regular wages of the employee. If Y elected
to withhold income tax using paragraph (a)(7) of this
section, Y would withhold on the $400,000 compo-
nent at 25 percent (pursuant to paragraph (a)(7)(ii)(F)
September 11, 20064312006–37 I.R.B.

of this section), which would result in $100,000 tax
withheld. The remaining $1,900,000 of the bonus
would be subject to mandatory flat rate withholding
at the maximum rate of tax in effect under section
1 for 2007 (35%) without regard to the Form W–4
submitted by A. The amount withheld from the
$1,900,000 would be $665,000. The withholding
on the first component and the withholding on the
second component then would be added together to
determine the total income tax withholding on the
supplemental wage payment from Y. Alternatively,
under paragraph (a)(4)(iv) of this section, Y could
treat the entire $2,300,000 bonus payment as subject
to mandatory flat rate withholding at the maximum
rate of tax (35%), in which case the amount to be
withheld would be 35 percent of $2,300,000, or
$805,000.
(iv) The $10,000 bonus paid from Z is also a sup-
plemental wage payment. To calculate the withhold-
ing on the $10,000 bonus, the $2,900,000 in cumu-
lative supplemental wages already paid to A in 2007
by X and Y must be taken into account because X,
Y, and Z are treated as a single employer. The en-
tire $10,000 bonus would be subject to mandatory flat
rate withholding at the maximum rate of tax in effect
under section 1 for 2007. The income tax required to
be withheld on this payment would be 35 percent of
$10,000 or $3,500.
Example 2. Employees B and C work for em-
ployer M. Each employee receives a monthly salary
of $3,000 in 2007. As a result of the withholding al-
lowances claimed by B, there has been no income tax
withholding on the regular wages M pays to B dur-
ing either 2007 or 2006. In contrast, M has with-
held income tax from regular wages M pays to C dur-
ing 2007. Together with the monthly salary check
paid in December 2007 to each employee, M includes
a bonus of $2,000, which is the only supplemental
wage payment each employee receives from M in
2007. The bonuses are separately stated on the pay-
roll records of M. BecauseM has withheld no income
tax from B’s regular wages during either the calendar
year of the $2,000 bonus or the preceding calendar
year, M cannot use optional flat rate withholding pro-
vided under paragraph (a)(7) of this section to calcu-
late the income tax withholding on B’s $2,000 bonus.
Consequently, M must use the aggregate procedure
set forth in paragraph (a)(6) of this section to calculate
the income tax withholding due on the $2,000 bonus
to B. With respect to the bonus paid to C, M has the
option of using either the aggregate procedure pro-
vided under paragraph (a)(6) of this section or the op-
tional flat rate withholding provided under paragraph
(a)(7) of this section to calculate the income tax with-
holding due.
Example 3. (i) Employee D works as an employee
of Corporation R. Corporations R and T are treated as
a single employer under section 52(a) or (b). R makes
regular wage payments to Employee D of $200,000
on a monthly basis in 2007, and income tax is with-
held from those wages. R pays D a bonus for his ser-
vices as an employee equal to $3,000,000 on June 30,
2007. Unrelated company U pays D sick pay as an
agent of the employer R and such sick pay is sup-
plemental wages pursuant to §31.3401(a)–1(b)(2). U
pays D $50,000 of sick pay on October 31, 2007. Cor-
poration T decides to award bonuses to all employees
of R and T, and pays a bonus of $100,000 to D on De-
cember 31, 2007. D received no other payments from
R, T, or U.
(ii) In chronological summary, D is paid the fol-
lowing wages other than the regular monthly wages
paid by R:
(A) June 30, 2007 — $3,000,000 (bonus from R);
(B) October 31, 2007 — $50,000 (sick pay from
U); and
(C) December 31, 2007 — $100,000 (bonus from
T).
(iii) In thisExample 3, each payment of wages
other than the regular monthly wage payments from R
is considered to be supplemental wages for purposes
of withholding under paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
The amount of regular wages from R is irrelevant in
determining when mandatory flat rate withholding on
supplemental wages must be applied.
(iv) Because income tax has been withheld on
D’s regular wages, income tax may be withheld on
$1,000,000 of the $3,000,000 bonus paid on June 30,
2007, under either paragraph (a)(6) or (7) of this sec-
tion. If R elects to use optional flat rate withhold-
ing provided under paragraph (a)(7)(ii)(F) of this sec-
tion, withholding would be calculated at 25 percent of
the $1,000,000 portion of the payment and would be
$250,000.
(v) Income tax withheld on the following supple-
mental wage payments (or portion of a payment) as
follows is required to be calculated at the maximum
rate in effect under section 1, or 35 percent in 2007—
(A) $2,000,000 of the $3,000,000 bonus paid by
R on June 30, 2007; and
(B) all of the $100,000 bonus paid by T on De-
cember 31, 2007.
(vi) Pursuant to paragraph (a)(4)(iii) of this sec-
tion, because the total wage payments made by U, an
agent of the employer, to D are less than $100,000,
U is permitted to determine the amount of income
tax to be withheld without regard to other supple-
mental wage payments made to the employee. In-
cometaxwithholdingonthe$50,000insickpaymay
be determined under either paragraph (a)(6) or (7) of
this section. If U elects to withhold income tax at
the flat rate provided under paragraph (a)(7)(ii)(F) of
this section, withholding on the $50,000 of sick pay
would be calculated at 25 percent of the $50,000 pay-
ment and would be $12,500. Alternatively, U may
choose to take account of the $3,000,000 in supple-
mental wages paid by the employer during 2007 prior
to payment of the $50,000 sick pay, and withholding
on the $50,000 of sick pay could be calculated apply-
ing the mandatory flat rate of 35 percent, resulting in
withholding of $17,500 on the $50,000 payment.
Example 4
. (i) Employer J has decided it wants
to grant its employee B a $1,000,000 net bonus (af-
ter withholding) to be paid in 2007. Employer J has
withheld income tax from the regular wages of the
employee. Employer J has made no other supplemen-
tal wage payments to B during the year. The rate for
mandatory flat rate withholding in effect in the year
in which the payment is made is 35 percent, and the
rate for optional flat rate withholding in effect is 25
percent.
(ii) ThisExample 4requires grossing up the
supplemental wage payment to determine the gross
wages necessary to result in a net payment of
$1,000,000. If the employer elected to use optional
flat rate withholding, the first $1,000,000 of the
wages would be subject to 25 percent withholding.
However, any wages above that, including amounts
representing gross-up payments, would be subject to
mandatory 35 percent withholding. The withholding
applicable to the first $1,000,000 (i.e., $250,000)
would thus be required to be grossed-up at a 35
percent rate to determine the gross wage amount in
excess of $1,000,000. Thus, the wages in excess
of $1,000,000 would be equal to $250,000 divided
by .65 (computed by subtracting .35 from 1) or
$384,615.38. Thus the total supplemental wage pay-
ment, taking into account income tax withholding
only (and not Federal Insurance Contributions Act
taxes), to B would be $1,384,615.38, and the total
withholding with respect to the payment if Employer
J elected optional flat rate withholding with respect
to the first $1,000,000, would be $384,615.38.
(9)Certain noncash payments to retail
commission salesmen. For provisions re-
lating to the treatment of wages that are not
subject to paragraph (a)(2) of this section
and that are paid other than in cash to retail
commission salesmen, see §31.3402(j)–1.
(10)Alternative methods. The Sec-
retary may provide by publication
in the Internal Revenue Bulletin (see
§601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b)ofthischapter)for
alternative withholding methods that will
allow an employer to meet its responsibil-
ity for the mandatory flat rate withholding
required by paragraph (a)(2) of this sec-
tion.
(b)Special rule where aggregate
withholding exemption exceeds wages
paid—(1)Procedure. This rule does not
apply to the extent that paragraph (a)(2)
of this section applies to the supplemental
wage payment. * * *
(2)Applicability. The rules prescribed
in this paragraph (b) shall, at the election
of the employer, be applied in lieu of the
rules prescribed in paragraph (a) of this
section except that this paragraph shall not
be applicable in any case in which the pay-
roll period of the employee is less than one
week or to the extent that paragraph (a)(2)
of this section applies to the supplemental
wage payment.
*****
Par. 5. Section 31.3402(j)–1 is
amended by adding a new sentence at
the beginning of paragraph (a)(2) to read
as follows:
§31.3402(j)–1 Remuneration other than
in cash for service performed by retail
commission salesman.
(a) * * *
(2) Section 3402(j) and this section are
not applicable with respect to wages paid
2006–37 I.R.B.432September 11, 2006

to the employee that are subject to with-
holding under §31.3402(g)–1(a)(2). * * *
*****
Par. 6. Section 31.3402(n)–1 is revised
and the authority citation at the end of the
section is removed to read as follows:
§31.3402(n)–1 Employees incurring no
income tax liability.
(a)In general. Notwithstanding any
other provision of this subpart (except to
the extent a payment of wages is subject to
withholding under §31.3402(g)–1(a)(2)),
an employer shall not deduct and with-
hold any tax under chapter 24 upon a pay-
ment of wages made to an employee, if
there is in effect with respect to the pay-
ment a withholding exemption certificate
furnished to the employer by the employee
which certifies that—
(1) The employee incurred no liability
for income tax imposed under subtitle A
of the Internal Revenue Code for his pre-
ceding taxable year; and
(2) The employee anticipates that he
will incur no liability for income tax im-
posed under subtitle A for his current tax-
able year.
(b)Mandatory flat rate withholding.To
the extent wages are subject to income tax
withholding under §31.3402(g)–1(a)(2),
such wages are subject to such income
tax withholding regardless of whether a
withholding exemption certificate under
section 3402(n) and the regulations there-
under has been furnished to the employer.
(c)Rules about withholding exemption
certificates. For rules relating to invalid
withholding exemption certificates, see
§31.3402(f)(2)–1(e), and for rules relat-
ing to disregarding certain withholding
exemption certificates on which an em-
ployee claims a complete exemption from
withholding, see §31.3402(f)(2)–1T(g).
(d)Examples. The following examples
illustrate this section:
Example 1. Employee A, an unmarried, calen-
dar-year basis taxpayer, files his income tax return for
2005 on April 10, 2006. A has adjusted gross income
of $5,000 and is not liable for any income tax. He had
$180 of income tax withheld during 2005. A antici-
pates that his gross income for 2006 will be approxi-
mately the same amount, and that he will not incur in-
come tax liability for that year. On April 20, 2006, A
commences employment and furnishes his employer
a withholding exemption certificate certifying that he
incurred no liability for income tax imposed under
subtitle A for 2005, and that he anticipates that he will
incur no liability for income tax imposed under sub-
title A for 2006. A’s employer shall not deduct and
withhold on payments of wages made to A on or after
April 20, 2006. Under §31.3402(f)(4)–2(c), unless
A furnishes a new withholding exemption certificate
certifying the statements described in paragraph (a) of
this section to his employer, his employer is required
to deduct and withhold upon payments of wages to A
made after February 15, 2007.
Example 2. Assume the facts are the same as
inExample 1except that A had been employed by
his employer prior to April 20, 2006, and had fur-
nished his employer a withholding exemption certifi-
cate prior to furnishing the withholding exemption
certificate certifying the statements described in para-
graph (a) of this section on April 20, 2006. Under sec-
tion 3402(f)(3)(B)(i), his employer would be required
to give effect to the new withholding exemption cer-
tificate no later than the beginning of the first payroll
period ending (or the first payment of wages made
without regard to a payroll period) on or after May 20,
2006. However, under section 3402(f)(3)(B)(ii), his
employer could, if it chose, make the new withhold-
ing exemption certificate effective with respect to any
payment of wages made on or after April 20, 2006,
and before the effective date mandated by section
3402(f)(3)(B)(i). Under §31.3402(f)(4)–2(c), unless
A furnishes a new withholding exemption certificate
certifying the statements described in paragraph (a) of
this section to his employer, his employer is required
to deduct and withhold upon payments of wages to A
made after February 15, 2007.
Example 3. Assume the facts are the same as
inExample 1except that for 2005 A has taxable in-
come of $8,000, income tax liability of $839, and in-
come tax withheld of $1,195. Although A received
a refund of $356 due to income tax withholding of
$1,195, he may not certify on his withholding exemp-
tion certificate that he incurred no liability for income
tax imposed by subtitle A for 2005.
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for
Services and Enforcement.
Approved July 14, 2006.
Eric Solomon,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary
oftheTreasury(TaxPolicy).
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on July 24, 2006,
8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal Register
for July 25, 2006, 71 F.R. 42049)
September 11, 20064332006–37 I.R.B.

Part III. Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous
26 CFR 601.702: Publication, public inspection, and
specific requests for records.
(Also: Part l, Section 6103(p)(2).)
Rev. Proc. 2006–35
SECTION 1. PURPOSE
The purpose of this revenue procedure
is to announce new user fees that will be
charged by the Internal Revenue Service to
process Form 8802,Application for United
States Residency Certification. The user
fee will be charged for all Form 8802 ap-
plications submitted with a postmark date
on or after October 2, 2006. The rules
for these user fees are set forth below and
will be incorporated in the next revision
of Form 8802 and accompanying instruc-
tions.
SECTION 2. BACKGROUND
Form 8802 is used to request Form
6166, a letter that the applicant may use as
proof of the applicant’s status as a resident
of the United States to claim benefits un-
deranincometaxtreatyoranexemption
from a value added tax (VAT) imposed
by a foreign country. Applicants that are
fiscally transparent for U.S. federal tax
purposes, such as partnerships, S corpo-
rations and grantor trusts, may request
certification based on the status of their
partners, shareholders, owners or benefi-
ciaries. Custodians must submit a separate
Form 8802 on behalf of each account
holder.
An applicant may request Form 6166
for multiple countries and multiple tax pe-
riods on a single Form 8802 application.
Form 8802 requires the applicant, among
other requirements, to specify the country
or countries for which certification is re-
quested, the number of Form(s) 6166 to be
issued for each country, the tax period(s)
for which certification is requested, as well
as the applicant’s taxpayer identification
number (TIN) and, in the case of appli-
cants that are fiscally transparent entities,
the TINs of the applicant’s partners, share-
holders, owners or beneficiaries. See Form
8802 and instructions for additional infor-
mation on the application process.
SECTION 3. PROCEDURES
.01 Requests to which a user fee applies
The user fee charge will apply to
process all Form 8802 applications sub-
mitted with a postmark date on or after
October 2, 2006. A user fee of $35.00 per
Form 8802 submitted will cover a request
for up to 20 original Forms 6166 issued
under a single TIN, regardless of the num-
ber of countries for which certification is
requested or the tax period(s) to which
the certification applies. An additional
$5.00 will cover a request on the same
Form 8802 for up to 20 additional Forms
6166 issued under the same TIN. Addi-
tional requests for Form 6166 submitted
on a separate Form 8802 will require the
payment of a new $35.00 user fee charge.
Applicants are thus advised to include all
Form 6166 requests on a single Form 8802
to avoid a new $35.00 user fee charge for
processing a second Form 8802 applica-
tion.
For example, if you request on Form
8802:
Number of Form 6166User Fee
1–20
$35.00
21–40
$40.00
41–60
$45.00
61–80
$50.00
Examples of applicable user fees:
(1) Requests by custodians.Acusto-
dian requesting certification on behalf of
an account holder will be charged a user
fee for each account holder based on the
number of Forms 6166 requested for that
person.
(2) Requests by partnerships or other
fiscally transparent entities with mul-
tiple partners, owners or beneficiaries.
A partnership, S corporation, grantor trust
or other fiscally transparent entity will be
charged a user fee based on the number
of Forms 6166 issued under its employer
identification number (EIN), notwith-
standing that the Internal Revenue Service
will verify the tax status of each of the part-
ners, owners or beneficiaries of the entity
who have consented to certification in the
name of the partnership, S corporation,
grantor trust or other fiscally transparent
entity.
.
02 Method of payment
Each application must be accompanied
by a check or money order payable to the
United States Treasury in U.S. dollars. Ap-
plicants should not send cash.
.
03 Effect of nonpayment or payment of
i
nsufficient amount
If Form 8802 is received and payment
has not been made or the payment was
made for less than the correct amount, the
U.S. residency certification unit will con-
tact the applicant or theapplicant’s autho-
rized representative and give a reasonable
amount of time to submit the proper user
fee. The applicant’s Form 8802 will not be
processed until proper payment has been
received.
.
04 Refunds of user fee
(1) Refunds will not be issued in the
following situations:
(a) Form 8802 is procedurally deficient
and the applicant fails to submit in a timely
manner the additional information neces-
sary to complete the application for pro-
cessing as requested;
(b) Form 8802 is withdrawn at any time
subsequent to its receipt.
(2) Refunds may be issued in the fol-
lowing situation:
Taking into account all the facts and
circumstances, including the Internal Rev-
enue Service’s resources devoted to the re-
2006–37 I.R.B.434September 11, 2006

quest, the responsible Accounts Manage-
ment Director in his or her sole discretion
decides a refund is appropriate.
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE
This revenue procedure is effective for
Form 8802 applications received with a
postmark date on or after October 2, 2006.
SECTION 5. DRAFTING
INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue
procedure is Quyen P. Huynh of the Of-
fice of Associate Chief Counsel (Inter-
national). For further information re-
garding this revenue procedure, contact
Ms. Huynh at (202) 622–3880 (not a
toll-free call); for information regarding
processing of Form 8802 and the user
fees, contact Mr. Robert Hergenhan of
Wage and Investment, Customer Account
Service, Accounts Management at (215)
516–6685 (not a toll-free call).
September 11, 20064352006–37 I.R.B.

Part IV. Items of General Interest
Announcement of Disciplinary Actions Involving
Attorneys, Certified Public Accountants, Enrolled Agents,
and Enrolled Actuaries — Suspensions, Censures,
Disbarments, and Resignations
Announcement 2006-57
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, attorneys, certified public
accountants, enrolled agents, and enrolled
actuaries may not accept assistance from,
or assist, any person who is under disbar-
ment or suspension from practice before
the Internal Revenue Service if the assis-
tance relates to a matter constituting prac-
tice before the Internal Revenue Service
and may not knowingly aid or abet another
person to practice before the Internal Rev-
enue Service during a period of suspen-
sion, disbarment, or ineligibility of such
other person.
To enable attorneys, certified public
accountants, enrolled agents, and enrolled
actuaries to identify persons to whom
these restrictions apply, the Director, Of-
fice of Professional Responsibility, will
announce in the Internal Revenue Bulletin
their names, their city and state, their pro-
fessional designation, the effective date
of disciplinary action, and the period of
suspension. This announcement will ap-
pear in the weekly Bulletin at the earliest
practicable date after such action and will
continue to appear in the weekly Bulletins
for five successive weeks.
Consent Suspensions From Practice Before the Internal
Revenue Service
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, an attorney, certified pub-
lic accountant, enrolled agent, or enrolled
actuary, in order to avoid the institution
or conclusion of a proceeding for his or
her disbarment or suspension from prac-
tice before the Internal Revenue Service,
may offer his or her consent to suspension
from such practice. The Director, Office
of Professional Responsibility, in his dis-
cretion, may suspend an attorney, certified
public accountant, enrolled agent, or en-
rolled actuary in accordance with the con-
sent offered.
The following individuals have been
placed under consent suspension from
practice before the Internal Revenue Ser-
vice:
NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Crane, StephenPalm Springs, CAEnrolled AgentMay 4, 2006
to
August 3, 2007
Cohen, Ronald J.Newburgh, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 21, 2006
Layson, David A.Corydon, INAttorneyApril 7, 2006
to
October 6, 2007
Brough, Donald L.Salem, INCPAJuly 1, 2006
to
June 30, 2010
Gulian, YervantGreat Neck, NYCPAApril 17, 2006
to
December 16, 2007
2006–37 I.R.B.436September 11, 2006

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Rivera-Smith, DawnBrick, NJCPAMay 30, 2006
to
November 29, 2008
Eckstein, MatthewWoodbury, NYCPAJune 15, 2006
to
March 14, 2007
Hecht, Jodee L.Clifton, VACPAIndefinite
from
June 19, 2006
Finch, Phillip W.Yorktown, VACPAIndefinite
from
June 22, 2006
Troese Jr., Henry A.Clarion, PAEnrolled AgentIndefinite
from
June 22, 2006
Robbins, Ronald E.Pittsford, VTCPAJune 24, 2006
to
June 23, 2008
Shapiro, Sidney C.West Palm Beach, FLCPAIndefinite
from
July 1, 2006
Martini, AnthonyStamford, CTCPAJune 18, 2006
to
December, 17, 2007
Cunningham, WilliamPhiladelphia, PACPAJuly 1, 2006
to
March 31, 2007
Simontacchi, Joseph F.Morris Plains, NJCPAIndefinite
from
July 1, 2006
Carroccio, Ronald P.Staten Island, NYCPAIndefinite
from
July 1, 2006
Miller, Walter P.Roanoke, VACPAIndefinite
from
July 1, 2006
Aneji, PatrickHouston, TXCPAIndefinite
from
June 22, 2006
Rosenbloom, Mark L.Chicago, ILAttorneyAugust 15, 2006
to
August 14, 2007
Viener, Ira S.Fort Lee, NJCPAIndefinite
from
August 1, 2006
September 11, 20064372006–37 I.R.B.

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Ganz, Sheldon M.Great Neck, NJCPAIndefinite
from
August 1, 2006
Tomasulo, MariaWantagh, NYCPAIndefinite
from
August 7, 2006
Galpern, Joel G.North Miami, FLCPAIndefinite
from
September 1, 2006
Expedited Suspensions From Practice Before the Internal
Revenue Service
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, the Director, Office of Pro-
fessional Responsibility, is authorized to
immediately suspend from practice before
the Internal RevenueService any practi-
tioner who, within five years from the date
the expedited proceeding is instituted (1)
has had a license to practice as an attor-
ney, certified public accountant, or actuary
suspended or revoked for cause or (2) has
been convicted of certain crimes.
The following individuals have been
placed under suspension from practice be-
fore the Internal Revenue Service by virtue
of the expedited proceeding provisions:
NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Dolan Jr., John L.Memphis, TNAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 3, 2006
St. Mary, Randall L.Snohomish, WAAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 3, 2006
Theriault, Michael J.Bel Air, MDAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 3, 2006
Smith, Bernard P.Marblehead, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 3, 2006
Bradley, Phillip M.West Point, VAAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 3, 2006
Haefele, Richard J.Wayzata, MNAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 3, 2006
Decker, William E.Mandeville, LAAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 3, 2006
Arbour, John J.Monroe, LAAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 3, 2006
2006–37 I.R.B.438September 11, 2006

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Keller, John S.Martin Kenner, LAAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 3, 2006
Fallon, Charles D.Neptune, NJAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 3, 2006
Agresti, Thomas J.Centennial, COAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 3, 2006
Kirsch, Craig F.Pittsburgh, PACPAIndefinite
from
April 3, 2006
Hall, Lenny G.McDowell, KYCPAIndefinite
from
April 11, 2006
Hultgren, Jerry R.Fresno, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 11, 2006
Loutos, Peter A.Chicago,ILAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 11, 2006
Smith III, Frank L.Bushnell, FLAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 11, 2006
Morley, Michael J.Springfield, PACPAIndefinite
from
April 11, 2006
Waters, Richard W.Smithfield, UTCPAIndefinite
from
April 11, 2006
Hartgraves, Travis M.Abilene, TXAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 14, 2006
Dunn, George T.Lockhart, TXAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 14, 2006
Adkins, Thomas R.Houston, TXAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 14, 2006
Hairston, John W.Sugar Land, TXAttorneyIndefinite
from
April 26, 2006
Marcone, Frank J.Upper Providence, PAAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 1, 2006
September 11, 20064392006–37 I.R.B.

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Fraley, Donald J.Minneapolis, MNAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 3, 2006
Tooke, S. JuddShreveport, LAAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 3, 2006
Reilly, Michael G.Council Bluffs, IAAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 3, 2006
Faneuil, Robert A.Newton, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 3, 2006
Maignan, Peter R.Upper Marlboro, MDAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 3, 2006
Son, DavidPhoenix, AZAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 5, 2006
Susman, Warren I.New York, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 8, 2006
Wurst, JeromeArlington, TXAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 8, 2006
O’Shea, Joseph G.Jackson Heights, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 8, 2006
Biegelson, AlanBrooklyn, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 8, 2006
Leonard, Robert K.Winston-Salem, NCAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 8, 2006
Cassidy, Michael M.Madison, WIAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 8, 2006
Dobkin, Daniel B.New Hyde Park, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 8, 2006
Nealy, Joseph L.Sugarland, TXAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 16, 2006
Conmey, Edwin W.Oconomowoc, WIAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 16, 2006
Knott Jr., Robert T.Los Angeles, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 16, 2006
2006–37 I.R.B.440September 11, 2006

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Diamond, Howard S.Mendham, NJAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 16, 2006
Fitzgerald, Bill L.Lubbock, TXAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 16, 2006
Brubaker, Gregory A.San Francisco, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 18, 2006
Dodenbier, Robert F.Lehi, UTAttorneyIndefinite
from
May 18, 2006
Young, Paul J.Taft, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 8, 2006
Dahodwala, FatemaAndover, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 8, 2006
Mendola, Joseph E.Monessen, PACPAIndefinite
from
June 8, 2006
Rooney, Edward F.Minneapolis, MNAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 8, 2006
Long, Rebecca L.Wichita,KSAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 8, 2006
West, Clifton C.Fayetteville, NCAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 8, 2006
Silva, Zoilo I.City Island, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 8, 2006
Tyler Jr., Earle S.Bangor, MEAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
Horneber, Alice S.Sioux City, IAAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
Donnelly, Christine M.Blue Springs, MOAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
Driscoll Jr., PeterColumbia, MDAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
Souza, John C.Pocatello, IDAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
September 11, 20064412006–37 I.R.B.

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Crockett, Kevin J.Midvale, UTAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
White, Debra M. WyattNavasota, TXCPAIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
Wilkins, Daniel J.Chelmsford, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
Merica, Chad L.Murray, UTCPAIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
Wintroub, David S.Omaha,NEAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
Smith, Roderick E.Kansas City, MOAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
Guida, Joseph M.Aberdeen, MDAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
Sonibare, NashSt. Paul, MNCPAIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
Braun, Marc W.St. Louis, MOAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
Coffey, John J.Rye, NHAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
Whitehead, H. AllenNew York, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
Lansky, SidneyMattapoisett, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
Pazniokas, Paul M.Norwood, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
Bajgrowicz, James J.Santa Rosa, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
Davis, Bret J.Los Angeles, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
McAvoy, TimothyChicago, ILAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
2006–37 I.R.B.442September 11, 2006

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Loffadelli, Thomas C.Studio City, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
Emeziem, Kelechi C.Antioch, CAAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
Pugh, William C.Wayzata,MNAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
Lamanna, Eugene C.Reading, PAAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
Bartels, John R.St. Paul, MNAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 12, 2006
Shapiro, Kenneth S.Bala Cynwyd, PACPAIndefinite
from
June 14, 2006
Stone, Jerry W.Austin, TXAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 21, 2006
Vanriper, Philip E.Binghamton, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 21, 2006
Simuro, Valerie T.Gardiner, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 21, 2006
Simms, William K.Brooklyn, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
June 21, 2006
Weaver, Terring M.Clarksburg, WVCPAIndefinite
from
July 1, 2006
Norman, ClarenceBrooklyn, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
August 3, 2006
Knight, John G.Winston-Salem, NCAttorneyIndefinite
from
August 3, 2006
Kronegold, Sheldon H.Englewood, NJAttorneyIndefinite
from
August 3, 2006
Foushee, Wayne H.Winston-Salem, NCAttorneyIndefinite
from
August 3, 2006
September 11, 20064432006–37 I.R.B.

Suspensions From Practice Before the Internal Revenue
Service After Notice and an Opportunity for a Proceeding
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Reg-
ulations, Part 10, after notice and an op-
portunity for a proceeding before an ad-
ministrative law judge, the following indi-
viduals have been placed under suspension
from practice before the Internal Revenue
Service:
NameAddressDesignationEffective Date
Kahn, HaroldHollis, NYCPAJune 26, 2006
to
June 25, 2010
Disbarments From Practice Before the Internal Revenue
Service After Notice and an Opportunity for a Proceeding
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, after notice and an oppor-
tunity for a proceeding before an adminis-
trative law judge, the following individu-
als have been disbarred from practice be-
fore the Internal Revenue Service:
NameAddressDesignationEffective Date
Gailey, James N.Huntersville, NCCPAJune 5, 2006
Censure Issued by Consent
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Reg-
ulations, Part 10, in lieu of a proceeding
being instituted or continued, an attorney,
certified public accountant, enrolled agent,
or enrolled actuary, may offer his or her
consent to the issuance of a censure. Cen-
sure is a public reprimand.
The following individuals have con-
sented to the issuance of a Censure:
NameAddressDesignationDate of Censure
Williams, Daniel S.Carlsbad, CAAttorneyMarch 29, 2006
Azan, Reinaldo L.Miami Beach, FLCPAJuly 24, 2006
Golub, Stephen B.Norwalk, CTCPAAugust 3, 2006
The 2006 Version of Form
8830, Enhanced Oil Recovery
Credit, Will Not Be Issued
Announcement 2006–62
This announcement is to advise that
Form 8830,Enhanced Oil Recovery
Credit,will not be issued for 2006 be-
cause the credit is phased out for 2006.
The enhanced oil recovery credit is
equal to 15% of the taxpayer’s qualified
enhanced oil recovery costs for the tax
year, but phased-out as crude oil prices
increase. The applicable crude oil prices
have increased sufficiently for the credit
to be phased-out entirely for 2006.
However, 2006 calendar year taxpayers
may still be entitled to the credit as a re-
sult of having it passed through to them
from fiscal year partnerships (other than
electing large partnerships) or S corpora-
tions whose tax year began in 2005. In
such a case, the partnership or S corpora-
tion will provide the taxpayer the neces-
sary information to report the credit on the
2006 Form 3800,General Business Credit.
2006–37 I.R.B.444September 11, 2006

Overview of the IRS’s Use of
Private Collection Agencies
(PCAs) in 2006
Announcement 2006–63
Section 881 of the American Jobs Cre-
ation Act, Pub. L. No. 108–357, enacted
new section 6306 of the Internal Revenue
Code (the Code), which authorizes the
Internal Revenue Service to enter into
contracts with private collection agencies
(PCAs) to assist in the collection of delin-
quent Federal tax liabilities. Shortly, three
PCAswillbegintoassisttheIRSwith
the collection of Federal tax debts pur-
suant to section 6306.This announcement
describes certain aspects of the IRS’s con-
tracts with PCAs, IRS monitoring of PCA
compliance with these provisions, and
protections for taxpayers whose accounts
are being assigned to PCAs for collection
activity.
THE ROLE OF PRIVATE COLLECTION
AGENCIES
Code section 6306 limits the role of
PCAs to three specific functions:
•Locating and contacting taxpayers
specified by the IRS concerning tax
debts specified by the IRS;
•Requesting payment of specified taxes
in a lump sum or, for taxpayers who
cannot pay all at once, by installment
agreement providing for full payment
over a period of not more than five
years; and
•Obtaining taxpayer financial informa-
tion specified by the IRS.
In addition, the IRS has further refined
theroleofPCAs.Tobeeligibleforanin-
stallment agreement, a taxpayer must file
all required Federal tax returns. PCAs will
request that the taxpayer provide informa-
tion regarding tax return filing compliance.
To verify the accuracy of the taxpayer’s
responses regarding whether the taxpayer
has filed all returns, the PCAs must con-
firm the information with the IRS. Only
IRS employees will have access to IRS
records to investigate the issue.
Although the IRS retains the right to ap-
prove or reject any installment agreement
negotiated between PCAs and taxpayers,
PCAs must obtain specific IRS approval of
any installment agreement involving pay-
ment of more than $25,000 or covering a
period of more than 36 months. During
evaluation of payment arrangements, the
PCA may request taxpayer financial infor-
mation that will be forwarded to the IRS.
PCAs are not authorized to negotiate in-
stallment agreements for periods exceed-
ing 60 months or that provide for less than
full payment of the taxpayer’s liability. In
such cases, PCAs will serve only to gather
financial information for transmittal to the
IRS.
Subject to certain limited exceptions,
PCAs are restricted from contacting third
parties during the course of their work on
behalf of the IRS. In the course of their
efforts to locate or obtain financial infor-
mation about a taxpayer, PCAs may ac-
cess non-IRS computer databases or web
sites. PCA employees are not permitted to
call or write any third party, such as the
taxpayer’s employer, bank, or neighbors,
to ask about the taxpayer’s financial con-
dition. PCA employees may speak to in-
termediaries, such as a taxpayer’s spouse,
or leave a message on an answering ma-
chine, for purposes of trying to contact the
taxpayer by phone. Once the PCA knows
how to reach a taxpayer directly, a PCA
employee may not contact third parties in
an effort to reach the taxpayer at a different
temporary location.
PCA EMPLOYEES MUST
SAFEGUARD TAXPAYER
INFORMATION
PCA employees may be given certain
tax return information necessary to per-
form services for the IRS. PCA employees
are prohibited by Code section 6103 from
disclosing the tax return information they
receive from the IRS or from taxpayers
to the same extent as are IRS employees.
PCA employees are also prohibited from
gaining access to tax return information
that is not necessary to the performance
of their duties. If PCA employees violate
their obligation to keep tax return informa-
tion confidential or if they gain access to
tax return information that is not necessary
to the performance of their duties under the
contract with the IRS, the PCA employees
may be subject to criminal prosecution un-
der Code section 7213 or 7213A. The tax-
payer whose return information was im-
properly disclosed may also have a civil
cause of action under Code section 7431.
The IRS will not provide PCAs with
copies of a taxpayer’s filed returns or with
access to any information the IRS has con-
cerning the taxpayer that is not necessary
for PCA employees to perform their jobs.
When the IRS refers a taxpayer’s account
to a PCA, the information the IRS will pro-
vide to PCAs includes:
•The taxpayer’s name and social secu-
rity number (or taxpayer identification
number);
•If the taxpayer’s spouse jointly owes
the tax liability, the name and social
security number of the spouse;
•The taxpayer’s last known address;
•The tax year and amount of the as-
signed debt, and the date when the
statute of limitations for collection ex-
pires; and
•The name, address, telephone number,
and authority level of any person the
taxpayer has given a power of attorney
or taxpayer information authorization.
If a taxpayer requests an installment
agreement and the PCA has been informed
that the taxpayer has not filed all required
returns, PCA employees will advise the
taxpayer to file any delinquent returns and
make any payments to a designated IRS
address, rather than to the PCA. If a tax-
payer mistakenly sends a return or pay-
ment to the PCA, the PCA will immedi-
ately transmit the return or payment to the
IRS.
After a PCA’s contract with the IRS
concludes, or after a particular taxpayer’s
account is recalled from a PCA by the IRS,
the PCA may retain any records it has con-
cerning the taxpayer only for the limited
time periods specified in the PCA’s con-
tract with the IRS. A PCA and its employ-
ees are strictly prohibited from using any
information obtained about a taxpayer in
the course of working on the contract with
the IRS for any purpose other than work-
ing on the contract.
If a taxpayer disputes the existence of a
debt with the IRS or the amount of the tax-
payer’s prior payments on a debt the IRS
has referred to a PCA, the PCA will refer
that dispute to the IRS for resolution. If
September 11, 20064452006–37 I.R.B.

the IRS determines that the existence and
amount of the debt is accurate and provides
the taxpayer with appropriate verification
of the debt, the PCA will continue to work
the account.
PCA EMPLOYEES MUST RESPECT
ALL TAXPAYER RIGHTS
The law which enables the IRS to use
PCAs also provides explicit protections of
taxpayer rights by PCAs, including:
•PCAs and their employees are required
by Code section 6306(b)(2) to observe
all of the Internal Revenue Code’s pro-
tections for taxpayer rights in the col-
lection process to the same extent as
IRS employees;
•PCAs may be sued by the taxpayer un-
der Code section 7433A and may be li-
able for damages if they fail to observe
all of the Internal Revenue Code’s pro-
tections for taxpayer rights in the col-
lection process;
•PCAs and their employees must obey
all other federal and state restrictions
that apply to private debt collectors,
pursuant to Code section 6306(e) and
15 U.S.C. section 1692n. Pursuant to
Code section 7433A(b)(3), PCAs en-
joy no special immunity from being
sued while working for the IRS;
•PCAs are specifically obligated to
comply with the provisions of the Fair
Debt Collection Practices Act, except
when those provisions are inconsistent
with the Internal Revenue Code, pur-
suant to Code section 6306(e);
•PCA employees will be disqualified
from further work on the IRS contract
if they are found to have committed
any act of misconduct described in sec-
tion 1203(b) of the IRS Restructuring
and Reform Act of 1998, pursuant to
section 881(d) of the American Jobs
Creation Act; and
•PCAs are subject to Taxpayer Assis-
tance Orders issued by the National
Taxpayer Advocate to the same extent
as the IRS, pursuant to Code section
7811(g).
Important taxpayer rights that apply to
a PCA’s work for the IRS include:
•A PCA’s employees may not contact
the taxpayer at any unusual time or
place, or at a time or place that the PCA
should know to be inconvenient, with-
out a taxpayer’s prior consent. Gener-
ally, no contacts will be made earlier
than 8 a.m. or later than 9 p.m. lo-
cal time at the taxpayer’s location, pur-
suant to Code section 6304(a);
•PCA employees may not suggest or
imply to the taxpayer or to any other
personthatthePCAmaybeableto
initiate enforced tax collection activity
(for example, file a lien, issue a levy,
make a property seizure, or commence
a legal action) or recommend enforced
collection action to the IRS, pursuant
to the IRS contracts with the PCAs and
15 U.S.C. section 1692e;
•PCA employees may not suggest or
imply that the taxpayer’s failure to pay
the tax debt may affect the taxpayer’s
credit rating or that the unpaid tax debt
may be reported to a credit bureau,
pursuant to Code section 6103 and 15
U.S.C. section 1692e; and
•If the taxpayer proposes an installment
agreement to the PCA and the IRS re-
jects the proposed installment agree-
ment, the taxpayer may appeal the re-
jection to the IRS. If the IRS assigns a
PCA to monitor an installment agree-
ment and the PCA determines the tax-
payer is in default, the taxpayer may
appeal to the IRS if the installment
agreement is terminated. In both sit-
uations, the taxpayer must first appeal
to the IRS office supervising the PCA’s
day-to-day work, but if not satisfied
the taxpayer may continue the appeal
to the IRS Office of Appeals, pursuant
to the IRS’s contracts with the PCAs
and the IRS’s implementation proce-
dures for Code sections 6159(e) and
7122(d)(1).
WHAT A TAXPAYER SHOULD
EXPECT FROM PRIVATE DEBT
COLLECTION
After the IRS notifies the taxpayer that
the taxpayer has an unpaid Federal tax
debt, the IRS may refer the taxpayer’s ac-
count to a PCA for collection. When the
IRS refers an unpaid tax debt to a PCA for
collection, the IRS will mail the taxpayer
a letter enclosing the new IRS publication,
“What You Can Expect When the IRS As-
signs Your Account to a Private Collec-
tion Agency.” The IRS mailing will pro-
vide the taxpayer with the PCA’s name,
address, and telephone number, and will
address frequently asked questions on the
private debt collection process. The mail-
ing will also include telephone numbers if
a taxpayer wants to contact the IRS office
overseeing the PCA or the Taxpayer Ad-
vocate Service (TAS). The mailing will ex-
plain that a taxpayer may request in writ-
ing to work with the IRS instead of with a
PCA to resolve the outstanding debt.
If a taxpayer requests TAS assistance or
describes circumstances meeting TAS cri-
teriatoaPCA,thePCAmustimmediately
complete an application for a taxpayer as-
sistance order with the relevant facts and
provide the form to an IRS employee who
serves as a liaison between the PCA and
TAS. Criteria for referring a taxpayer ac-
count to TAS include circumstances when
a taxpayer has experienced a delay of more
than 30 days to resolve a taxpayer account
problem with the IRS or when a taxpayer
is experiencing or is about to suffer eco-
nomic harm.
Within ten days after the IRS refers an
account, the PCA should send a letter to
the taxpayer with copies to the taxpayer’s
authorized representatives. The letter will
introduce the PCA, provide information on
the balance due to the IRS, and provide
a scannable payment coupon for the tax-
payertomakeapaymenttotheIRS.Al-
though the IRS may pay PCAs a fee for
their collection efforts, a taxpayer will re-
ceive credit for the full amounts paid to the
IRS.
The PCA may use techniques approved
by the IRS and in compliance with the Fair
Debt Collection Practices Act to locate and
contact the taxpayer by telephone. A PCA
employee will discuss payment options
with the taxpayer. If the taxpayer cannot
pay in full immediately, the PCA will
discuss the option of payment by means
of an installment agreement. Some types
of installment agreements will require the
PCA to obtain financial information from
the taxpayer. Although installment pay-
ments will be made directly to the IRS,
PCAsmaybeusedtomonitorataxpayer’s
compliance with installment agreements.
PCAs are not authorized to discuss of-
fers-in-compromise. PCA employees will
2006–37 I.R.B.446September 11, 2006

direct a taxpayer who wishes to discuss an
offer-in-compromise to contact the IRS.
Taxpayers who indicate that their financial
situations make them unable to pay the
amount of the debt may also be referred to
the IRS.
IRS MONITORING AND OVERSIGHT
The IRS has created special units of
IRS employees to provide monitoring and
oversight for all PCA operations on be-
half of the IRS. The IRS also has trained
key personnel in each PCA concerning
taxpayer privacy, other taxpayer rights
and IRS procedures, and has provided the
PCAs with videos, instructional materi-
als and operational handbooks. Training
programs delivered by key personnel with
each PCA to other PCA employees, in
turn, were reviewed and approved by the
IRS. The IRS also carefully reviews and
approves standard PCA correspondence,
telephone scripts and checklists.
PCAs must keep telephone logs of all
incoming and outgoing calls, and must
make these logs available to the IRS. The
IRS will randomly monitor PCA calls to
assure that taxpayers are treated fairly and
professionally.
Taxpayers may contact the PCA or the
IRS concerning the conduct of any PCA
employee. In the event of a complaint
about a PCA, the IRS will direct the PCA
to suspend collection activity on the ac-
count until the PCA and IRS have evalu-
ated the complaint. Each PCA is required
to keep a complaint log, accessible to the
IRS, including employees of the TAS, and
to the Treasury Inspector General for Tax
Administration.
CONTACT INFORMATION
For further information regarding this
announcement, contact Joyce Peneau at
202–283–0715 (not a toll-free number) or
by email atPDC@irs.gov.
Section 1248 Attribution
Principles; Correction
Announcement 2006–64
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service
(IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
correction
SUMMARY: This document cor-
rects a notice of proposed rulemaking
(REG–135866–02, 2006–27 I.R.B. 34)
that was published in theFederal Regis-
teron Friday, June 2, 2006 (71 FR 31985)
providing guidance for determining the
earnings and profits attributable to stock
of controlled foreign corporations (or for-
mer controlled foreign corporations) that
are (were) involved in certain nonrecogni-
tion transactions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT: Michael Gilman, (202)
622–3850 (not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The notice of proposed rulemaking
(REG–135866–02) that is the subject of
this correction is under section 1248 of the
Internal Revenue Code.
Need for Correction
As published, REG–135866–02 con-
tains errors that may prove to be mislead-
ing and are in need of clarification.
Correction of Publication
Accordingly, the publication of the
proposed regulations (REG–135866–02)
which was the subject of FR. Doc.
E6–8551, is corrected as follows:
1. On page 31990, column 1, in the pre-
amble, under the paragraph heading
“Explanations of Provisions”, fol-
lowing the second full paragraph of
the column, the following language
is added:
“F. Effective Date.
These regulations are proposed to apply
to income inclusions that occur on or after
the date that final regulations are published
in theFederal Register.”
2. On page 31990, column 1, in the pre-
amble, under the paragraph heading
“Explanations of Provisions”, the
language “F. Request for Comments”
is corrected to read “G. Request for
Comments”.
Guy Traynor,
Chief, Publications and
Regulations Branch,
Legal Processing Division,
Associate Chief Counsel
(Procedure and Administration).
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on August 11,
2006, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal
Register for August 14, 2006, 71 F.R. 46415)
Section 1248 Attribution
Principles; Correction
Announcement 2006–65
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service
(IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
correction
SUMMARY: This document cor-
rects a notice of proposed rulemaking
(REG–135866–02, 2006–27 I.R.B. 34)
that was published in theFederal Regis-
teron Friday, June 2, 2006 (71 FR 31985)
providing guidance for determining the
earnings and profits attributable to stock
of controlled foreign corporations (or for-
mer controlled foreign corporations) that
are (were) involved in certain nonrecogni-
tion transactions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT: Michael Gilman, (202)
622–3850 (not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The notice of proposed rulemaking
(REG–135866–02) that is the subject of
this correction is under section 1248 of the
Internal Revenue Code.
Need for Correction
As published, REG–135866–02 con-
tains errors that may prove to be mislead-
ing and are in need of clarification.
*****
Correction of Publication
Accordingly, the notice of proposed
rulemaking (REG–135866–02) that was
the subject of FR Doc. EG–8551 is cor-
rected as follows:
September 11, 20064472006–37 I.R.B.

PART 1 — INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for
part 1 continues to read in part as follows:
Authority:26 USC 7805 * * *
Par. 2. On page 31991, instructional
Par. 4.is amended by adding a new entry
at the end of the amendatory instruction to
read as follows:
6. Adding new paragraph (g).
§1.1248–1 [Corrected]
Par. 3. On page 31991, section
1.1248–1 is amended by adding a new
paragraph (g) to read as follows:
§ 1.1248–1 Treatment of gain from certain
sales or exchanges of stock in certain
foreign corporations
*****
(g)Effective date. Paragraph (a)(4) and
paragraph (a)(5),Example 4, of this sec-
tion apply to income inclusions that occur
on or after the date that paragraph and ex-
ample are published as final regulations in
theFederal Register.
*****
Guy Traynor,
Chief, Publications and
Regulations Branch,
Legal Processing Division,
Associate Chief Counsel
(Procedure and Administration).
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on August 11,
2006, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal
Register for August 14, 2006, 71 F.R. 46416)
Guidance Under Section
1502; Suspension of Losses
on Certain Stock Dispositions;
Correcting Amendment
Announcement 2006–66
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service
(IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Correcting amendment.
SUMMARY: This document contains cor-
rections to final regulations (T.D. 9254,
2006–13 I.R.B. 662) that were published in
theFederal Registeron Tuesday, March
14, 2006 (71 FR 13008) regarding guid-
ance on suspension of losses on certain
stock dispositions.
DATES: These corrections are effective
March 14, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT: Theresa Abell (202)
622–7700 (not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The final regulations (T.D. 9254) that
are the subject of this correction are under
section 1502 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Need for Correction
As published, final regulations (T.D.
9254) contains errors that may prove to be
misleading and are in need of clarification.
*****
Correction of Publication
Accordingly, 26 CFR Parts 1 and 602
are corrected by making the following cor-
recting amendments:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1.The authority citation for
part 1 is amended and continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
§1.1502–35 [Corrected]
Par. 2.Section 1.1502–35 is amended
as follows:
1. By revising the text of paragraph
(d)(4)(i)(B)(2).
2. By revising the text of paragraphs
(d)(8) and (d)(9).
3. By revising the text of paragraph (e),
Example 3., paragraph (v).
4. By revising the text of paragraph (e),
Example 4., the first sentence of para-
graph (iv) and paragraph (v).
5. By revising the text of paragraph (e),
Example 6., paragraph (i).
6. By revising the text of paragraph
(g)(5)Examples 1.and2, the first
sentence of paragraph (i).
7. By revising the text of paragraph
(g)(5)Example 3, the first three sen-
tences of paragraphs (i) and paragraph
(ii).
8. By revising the text of the first sen-
tence of paragraph (j).
§1.1502–35 Transfers of subsidiary stock
and deconsolidations of subsidiaries.
*****
(d)
(4) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) * * *
(2) Any liabilities of the subsidiary that
have been taken into account for tax pur-
poses.
*****
(8) Higher-tier. A subsidiary is
higher-tier with respect to a member if
or to the extent investment adjustments
under §1.1502–32 with respect to the
stock of the latter member would affect
investment adjustments with respect to the
stock of the former member.
(9) Lower-tier. A subsidiary is lower-
tier with respect to a member if or to the
extent investment basis adjustments under
§1.1502–32 with respect to the stock of the
former member would affect investment
adjustments with respect to the stock of the
latter member.
(e) * * *
Example 3. ***
(v)Effect of subsequent stock sale. P recognizes
$0 gain/loss on the Year 6 sale of its remaining S com-
mon stock. No amount of suspended loss remains to
be allowed under paragraph (c)(5) of this section.
Example 4. ***
(iv)Effect of subsequent asset sale on suspended
loss. Because P cannot establish that all or a portion
of the loss recognized on the sale of Asset B was
not reflected in the calculation of the duplicated loss
of S2 on the date of the Year 4 stock sale and such
loss is allocable to the period beginning on the date
of the Year 4 disposition of the S2 stock and ending
on the day before the first date on which S2 is not a
member of the P group and is taken into account in
determining consolidated taxable income (or loss) of
the P group for a taxable year that includes a date on
or after the date of the Year 4 disposition and before
2006–37 I.R.B.448September 11, 2006

the first date on which S2 is not a member of the
P group, such asset loss reduces the suspended loss
pursuant to paragraph (c)(4) of this section. * * *
(v)Effect of subsequent stock sale. In year 6,
when S1 sells its remaining S2 stock for $100, it rec-
ognizes $0 gain/loss. Pursuant to paragraph (c)(5) of
this section, the remaining $5 of the suspended loss
is allowed on the P group’s return for Year 6 when S1
sells its remaining S2 stock.
*****
Example 6.***(i)InYear1.PformsSwitha
contribution of $80 in exchange for 80 shares of com-
mon stock of S which at that time represents all of the
outstanding stock of S. S becomes a member of the P
group. In Year 2, P contributes Asset A with a basis
of $50 and a value of $20 in exchange for 20 shares of
common stock of S in a transfer to which section 351
applies. In Year 4, in a transaction that is not part of a
plan that includes the Year 1 and Year 2 contributions,
P contributes the 20 shares of S common stock it ac-
quired in Year 2 to PS, a partnership, in exchange for
a 20 percent capital and profits interest in a transac-
tiondescribedinsection721. Immediatelyafterthe
contribution to PS, S is a member of the P group. In
Year 5, P sells its interest in PS for $20.
*****
(g) * * *
(5) * * *
Example 1. Transfers of property in the avoid-
ance of basis redetermination rule—(i)Facts. In Year
1, P forms S with a contribution of $100 in exchange
for 100 shares of common stock of S which at that
time represents all of the outstanding stock of S. S
becomes a member of the P group. In Year 2, P con-
tributes 20 shares of common stock of S to PS, a part-
nership, in exchange for a 20 percent capital and prof-
its interest in a transaction described in section 721.
In Year 3, P contributes Asset A with a basis of $50
and a value of $20 to PS in exchange for an additional
capital and profits interest in PS in a transaction de-
scribedinsection721.AlsoinYear3,PScontributes
Asset A to S and P contributes an additional $80 to S
in transfers to which section 351 applies. In Year 4, S
sells Asset A for $20, recognizing a loss of $30. The
P group uses that loss to offset income of P. In Year
5, P sells its entire interest in PS for $40.
Example 2.Transfers effecting a reimportation of
loss—(i)Facts. In Year 1, P forms S with a contribu-
tion of Asset A with a value of $100 and a basis of
$120, Asset B with a value of $50 and a basis of $70,
and Asset C with a value of $90 and a basis of $100
in exchange for all of the common stock of S and S
becomes a member of the P group. * * *
*****
Example 3.Transfers to avoid recognition of
gain—(i)Facts. P owns all of the stock of S1 and
S2. The S2 stock has a basis of $400 and a value of
$500. S1 owns 50% of the S3 common stock with a
basis of $150. * * *
(ii)Analysis. Pursuant to paragraph (b)(4) of this
section, because S2 owns stock of S3 (another sub-
sidiary of the same group) and, immediately after the
sale of the S2 stock, S3 is a member of the group, then
for purposes of applying paragraph (b) of this section,
S2 is deemed to have transferred its S3 stock. Be-
cause S3 is a member of the group immediately after
the transfer of the S2 stock and the S3 stock deemed
transferred has a basis in excess of value, the group
in the S3 stock is redetermined pursuant to paragraph
(b)(1) of this section immediately prior to the sale of
the S2 stock.
Accordingly, P would recognize only $1 of gain
on the sale of its S2 stock. However, because the re-
capitalization of the S3 was structured with a view to,
and has the effect of, avoiding the recognition of gain
on a disposition of stock by invoking the application
of paragraph (b) of this section, paragraph (g)(4)(i)
of this section applies. Accordingly, paragraph (b) of
this section does not apply upon P’s disposition of the
S2 stock and P recognizes $100 gain on the disposi-
tion of the S2 stock.
*****
(j)Effective date. This section applies
with respect to stock transfers, deconsol-
idations of subsidiaries, determinations of
worthlessness, and stock dispositions on or
after March 10, 2006. * * *
*****
Guy R. Traynor,
Branch Chief, Publications
and Regulations Branch,
Legal Processing Division,
Associate Chief Counsel
(Procedure and Administration).
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on August 18,
2006, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal
Register for August 21, 2006, 71 F.R. 48473)
Deletions From Cumulative
List of Organizations
Contributions to Which
are Deductible Under Section
170 of the Code
Announcement 2006–69
The Internal Revenue Service has re-
voked its determination that the organiza-
tion listed below qualifies as an organi-
zation described in sections 501(c)(3) and
170(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986.
Generally, the Service will not disallow
deductions for contributions made to a
listed organization on or before the date
of announcement in the Internal Revenue
Bulletinthatanorganizationnolonger
qualifies. However, the Service is not
precluded from disallowing a deduction
for any contributions made after an or-
ganization ceases to qualify under section
170(c)(2) if the organization has not timely
filed a suit for declaratory judgment under
section 7428 and if the contributor (1) had
knowledge of the revocation of the ruling
or determination letter, (2) was aware that
such revocation was imminent, or (3) was
in part responsible for or was aware of the
activities or omissions of the organization
that brought about this revocation.
If on the other had a suite for declara-
tory judgment has been timely filed, con-
tributions from individuals and organiza-
tions described in section 170(c)(2) that
are otherwise allowable will continue to
be deductible. Protection under section
7428(c) would begin on September 11,
2006, and would end on the date the court
first determines that the organization is
not described in section 170(c)(2) as more
particularly set forth in section 7428(c)(1).
For individual contributors, the maximum
deduction protected is $1,000, with a hus-
band and wife treated as one contributor.
This benefit is not extended to any indi-
vidual, in whole or in part, for the acts or
omissions of the organization that were
the basis for revocation.
Youth Ministries, Inc., d/b/a
Operation Rescue West
Wichita, KS
September 11, 20064492006–37 I.R.B.

Definition of Terms
Revenue rulings and revenue procedures
(hereinafter referred to as “rulings”) that
have an effect on previous rulings use the
following defined terms to describe the ef-
fect:
Amplifieddescribes a situation where
no change is being made in a prior pub-
lished position, but the prior position is be-
ingextendedtoapplytoavariationofthe
fact situation set forth therein. Thus, if
an earlier ruling held that a principle ap-
plied to A, and the new ruling holds that the
same principle also applies to B, the earlier
ruling is amplified. (Compare withmodi-
fied,below).
Clarifiedis used in those instances
where the language in a prior ruling is be-
ing made clear because the language has
caused, or may cause, some confusion.
It is not used where a position in a prior
ruling is being changed.
Distinguisheddescribes a situation
where a ruling mentions a previously pub-
lished ruling and points out an essential
difference between them.
Modifiedis used where the substance
of a previously published position is being
changed. Thus, if a prior ruling held that a
principle applied to A but not to B, and the
new ruling holds that it applies to both A
and B, the prior ruling is modified because
it corrects a published position. (Compare
withamplifiedandclarified, above).
Obsoleteddescribes a previously pub-
lished ruling that is not considered deter-
minative with respect to future transac-
tions. This term is most commonly used in
a ruling that lists previously published rul-
ings that are obsoleted because of changes
in laws or regulations. A ruling may also
be obsoleted because the substance has
been included in regulations subsequently
adopted.
Revokeddescribes situations where the
position in the previously published ruling
is not correct and the correct position is
beingstatedinanewruling.
Supersededdescribes a situation where
the new ruling does nothing more than re-
state the substance and situation of a previ-
ously published ruling (or rulings). Thus,
the term is used to republish under the
1986 Code and regulations the same po-
sition published under the 1939 Code and
regulations. The term is also used when
it is desired to republish in a single rul-
ing a series of situations, names, etc., that
were previously published over a period of
time in separate rulings. If the new rul-
ing does more than restate the substance
of a prior ruling, a combination of terms
is used. For example,modifiedandsu-
persededdescribes a situation where the
substance of a previously published ruling
is being changed in part and is continued
without change in part and it is desired to
restate the valid portion of the previously
published ruling in a new ruling that is self
contained. In this case, the previously pub-
lished ruling is first modified and then, as
modified, is superseded.
Supplementedis used in situations in
which a list, such as a list of the names of
countries, is published in a ruling and that
list is expanded by adding further names in
subsequent rulings. After the original rul-
ing has been supplemented several times, a
new ruling may be published that includes
the list in the original ruling and the ad-
ditions, and supersedes all prior rulings in
the series.
Suspendedis used in rare situations
to show that the previous published rul-
ings will not be applied pending some
future action such as the issuance of new
or amended regulations, the outcome of
cases in litigation, or the outcome of a
Service study.
Abbreviations
The fol
lowing abbreviations in current use
and for
merly used will appear in material
publis
hedintheBulletin.
A—Individual.
Acq.—A
cquiescence.
B—Individual.
BE—Beneficiary.
BK—Bank
.
B.T.A.—Board of Tax Appeals.
C—Individual.
C.B.—Cu
mulative Bulletin.
CFR—Code of Federal Regulations.
CI—City.
COOP—Coo
perative.
Ct.D.—Court Decision.
CY—County.
D—Decede
nt.
DC—Dummy Corporation.
DE—Donee.
Del. Order
—Delegation Order.
DISC—Domestic International Sales Corporation.
DR—Donor.
E—Estate.
EE—Employee.
E.O.—Executive Order.
ER—Emp
loyer.
ERISA—Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
EX—Executor.
F—Fiduc
iary.
FC—Foreign Country.
FICA—Federal Insurance Contributions Act.
FISC—Fo
reign International Sales Company.
FPH—Foreign Personal Holding Company.
F.R.—Federal Register.
FUTA—Fed
eral Unemployment Tax Act.
FX—Foreign corporation.
G.C.M.—Chief Counsel’s Memorandum.
GE—Grante
e.
GP—General Partner.
GR—Grantor.
IC—Insura
nce Company.
I.R.B.—Internal Revenue Bulletin.
LE—Lessee.
LP—Limited
Partner.
LR—Lessor.
M—Minor.
Nonacq.—No
nacquiescence.
O—Organization.
P—Parent Corporation.
PHC—Persona
l Holding Company.
PO—Possession of the U.S.
PR—Partner.
PRS—Pa
rtnership.
PTE—Prohibited Transaction Exemption.
Pub. L.—Public Law.
REIT—Re
al Estate Investment Trust.
Rev. Proc.—Revenue Procedure.
Rev. Rul.—Revenue Ruling.
S—Subsi
diary.
S.P.R.—Statement of Procedural Rules.
Stat.—Statutes at Large.
T—Target
Corporation.
T.C.—Tax Court.
T.D.—Treasury Decision.
TFE—Trans
feree.
TFR—Transferor.
T.I.R.—Technical Information Release.
TP—Taxpay
er.
TR—Trust.
TT—Trustee.
U.S.C.—Uni
ted States Code.
X—Corporation.
Y—Corporation.
Z—Corporat
ion.
2006–37 I.R.B.iSeptember 11, 2006

Numerical Finding List
1
Bulletins 2006–27 through 2006–37
Announcements:
2006-42, 2006-27 I.R.B.48
2006-43, 2006-27 I.R.B.48
2006-44, 2006-27 I.R.B.49
2006-45, 2006-31 I.R.B.121
2006-46, 2006-28 I.R.B.76
2006-47, 2006-28 I.R.B.78
2006-48, 2006-31 I.R.B.135
2006-49, 2006-29 I.R.B.89
2006-50, 2006-34 I.R.B.321
2006-51, 2006-32 I.R.B.222
2006-52, 2006-33 I.R.B.254
2006-53, 2006-33 I.R.B.254
2006-54, 2006-33 I.R.B.254
2006-55, 2006-35 I.R.B.342
2006-56, 2006-35 I.R.B.342
2006-57, 2006-35 I.R.B.343
2006-58, 2006-36 I.R.B.388
2006-59, 2006-36 I.R.B.388
2006-60, 2006-36 I.R.B.389
2006-61, 2006-36 I.R.B.390
2006-62, 2006-37 I.R.B.444
2006-63, 2006-37 I.R.B.445
2006-64, 2006-37 I.R.B.447
2006-65, 2006-37 I.R.B.447
2006-66, 2006-37 I.R.B.448
2006-69, 2006-37 I.R.B.449
Notices:
2006-56, 2006-28 I.R.B.58
2006-57, 2006-27 I.R.B.13
2006-58, 2006-28 I.R.B.59
2006-59, 2006-28 I.R.B.60
2006-60, 2006-29 I.R.B.82
2006-61, 2006-29 I.R.B.85
2006-62, 2006-29 I.R.B.86
2006-63, 2006-29 I.R.B.87
2006-64, 2006-29 I.R.B.88
2006-65, 2006-31 I.R.B.102
2006-66, 2006-30 I.R.B.99
2006-67, 2006-33 I.R.B.248
2006-68, 2006-31 I.R.B.105
2006-69, 2006-31 I.R.B.107
2006-70, 2006-33 I.R.B.252
2006-71, 2006-34 I.R.B.316
2006-72, 2006-36 I.R.B.363
2006-73, 2006-35 I.R.B.339
2006-74, 2006-35 I.R.B.339
2006-75, 2006-36 I.R.B.366
Proposed Regulations:
REG-135866-02, 2006-27 I.R.B.34
Proposed Regulations— Continued:
REG-146893-02, 2006-34 I.R.B.317
REG-159929-02, 2006-35 I.R.B.341
REG-148864-03, 2006-34 I.R.B.320
REG-109512-05, 2006-30 I.R.B.100
REG-112994-06, 2006-27 I.R.B.47
REG-118775-06, 2006-28 I.R.B.73
REG-118897-06, 2006-31 I.R.B.120
REG-124152-06, 2006-36 I.R.B.368
REG-125071-06, 2006-36 I.R.B.375
Revenue Procedures:
2006-29, 2006-27 I.R.B.13
2006-30, 2006-31 I.R.B.110
2006-31, 2006-27 I.R.B.32
2006-32, 2006-28 I.R.B.61
2006-33, 2006-32 I.R.B.140
2006-35, 2006-37 I.R.B.434
Revenue Rulings:
2006-35, 2006-28 I.R.B.50
2006-36, 2006-36 I.R.B.353
2006-37, 2006-30 I.R.B.91
2006-38, 2006-29 I.R.B.80
2006-39, 2006-32 I.R.B.137
2006-40, 2006-32 I.R.B.136
2006-41, 2006-35 I.R.B.331
2006-42, 2006-35 I.R.B.337
2006-43, 2006-35 I.R.B.329
2006-44, 2006-36 I.R.B.361
2006-45, 2006-37 I.R.B.423
Treasury Decisions:
9265, 2006-27 I.R.B.1
9266, 2006-28 I.R.B.52
9267, 2006-34 I.R.B.313
9268, 2006-30 I.R.B.94
9269, 2006-30 I.R.B.92
9270, 2006-33 I.R.B.237
9271, 2006-33 I.R.B.224
9272, 2006-35 I.R.B.332
9273, 2006-37 I.R.B.394
9274, 2006-33 I.R.B.244
9275, 2006-35 I.R.B.327
9276, 2006-37 I.R.B.423
9277, 2006-33 I.R.B.226
9278, 2006-34 I.R.B.256
9279, 2006-36 I.R.B.355
1
A cumulative list of all revenue rulings, revenueprocedures, Treasury decisions, etc., publishedin Internal Revenue Bulletins 2006–1 through 2006–26 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin
2006–26, dated June 26, 2006.
September 11, 2006ii2006–37 I.R.B.

Finding List of Current Actions on
Previously Published Items
1
Bulletins 2006–27 through 2006–37
Announcements:
2005-59
Updated and superseded by
Ann. 2006-45, 2006-31 I.R.B.121
Notices:
2002-45
Amplified by
Rev. Rul. 2006-36, 2006-36 I.R.B.353
2006-20
Supplemented and modified by
Notice 2006-56, 2006-28 I.R.B.58
2006-53
Modified by
Notice 2006-71, 2006-34 I.R.B.316
Proposed Regulations:
REG-135866-02
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-64, 2006-37 I.R.B.447
Ann. 2006-65, 2006-37 I.R.B.447
REG-134317-05
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-47, 2006-28 I.R.B.78
Revenue Procedures:
2002-9
Modified and amplified by
Notice 2006-67, 2006-33 I.R.B.248
2005-41
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2006-29, 2006-27 I.R.B.13
2005-49
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2006-33, 2006-32 I.R.B.140
Revenue Rulings:
81-35
Amplified and modified by
Rev. Rul. 2006-43, 2006-35 I.R.B.329
81-36
Amplified and modified by
Rev. Rul. 2006-43, 2006-35 I.R.B.329
87-10
Amplified and modified by
Rev. Rul. 2006-43, 2006-35 I.R.B.329
2002-41
Amplified by
Rev. Rul. 2006-36, 2006-36 I.R.B.353
Revenue Rulings— Continued:
2003-43
Amplified by
Notice 2006-69, 2006-31 I.R.B.107
2005-24
Amplified by
Rev. Rul. 2006-36, 2006-36 I.R.B.353
Treasury Decisions:
9254
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-44, 2006-27 I.R.B.49
Ann. 2006-66, 2006-37 I.R.B.448
9258
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-46, 2006-28 I.R.B.76
9262
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-56, 2006-35 I.R.B.342
9264
Corrected by
Ann. 2006-46, 2006-28 I.R.B.76
1
A cumulative list of current actions on previously published items in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2006–1 through 2006–26 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2006–26, dated June 26, 2006.
2006–37 I.R.B.iiiSeptember 11, 2006

September 11, 20062006–37 I.R.B.

2006–37 I.R.B.September 11, 2006

September 11, 20062006–37 I.R.B.

INTERNAL REVENUE BULLETIN
The Introduction at the beginning of this issue describes the purpose and content of this publication. The weekly Internal Revenue
Bulletin is sold on a yearly subscription basis by the Superintendent of Documents. Current subscribers are notified by the Superin-
tendent of Documents when their subscriptions must be renewed.
CUMULATIVE BULLETINS
The contents of this weekly Bulletin are consolidated semiannually into a permanent, indexed, Cumulative Bulletin. These are
sold on a single copy basis andare notincluded as part of the subscription to the Internal Revenue Bulletin. Subscribers to the weekly
Bulletin are notified when copies of the Cumulative Bulletin are available. Certain issues of Cumulative Bulletins are out of print
and are not available. Persons desiring available Cumulative Bulletins, which are listed on the reverse, may purchase them from the
Superintendent of Documents.
ACCESS THE INTERNAL REVENUE BULLETIN ON THE INTERNET
You may view the Internal Revenue Bulletin on the Internet at www.irs.gov. Under information for: select Businesses. Under
related topics, select More Topics. Then select Internal Revenue Bulletins.
INTERNAL REVENUE BULLETINS ON CD-ROM
Internal Revenue Bulletins are available annually as part ofPublication 1796 (Tax Products CD-ROM). The CD-ROM can be
purchased from National Technical Information Service (NTIS) on the Internet at www.irs.gov/cdorders (discount for online orders)
or by calling 1-877-233-6767. The first release is available in mid-December and the final release is available in late January.
HOW TO ORDER
Check the publications and/or subscription(s) desired on the reverse, complete the order blank, enclose the proper remittance,
detach entire page, and mail to the Superintendent of Documents, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh PA, 15250–7954. Please allow two to
six weeks, plus mailing time, for delivery.
WE WELCOME COMMENTS ABOUT THE INTERNAL
REVENUE BUL
LETIN
If you have c
omments concerning the format or production of the Internal Revenue Bulletin or suggestions for improving it,
we would be p
leased to hear from you. You can e-mail us your suggestions or comments through the IRS Internet Home Page
(www.irs.g
ov) or write to the IRS Bulletin Unit, SE:W:CAR:MP:T:T:SP, Washington, DC 20224
Internal Revenue Service
W
ashington,DC20224
Official B
usiness
Penalty for
Private Use, $300