us-uspto-mpep-archived-e3r28_300•300
Printed page 1
Printed page 2
Printed page 3
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
# Chapter 300 Ownership and Assignment ## 301 Assignability of Patents and Applications 301.01 Accessibility of Assignment Records 302 Effect of Recording 303 Endorsing Assignments on Pending Applications 304 Conflicting Subject Matter in Two Applications of Same Inventor, One of Which Is Assigned 305 Different Inventors, Common Ownership 305.01 Unclaimed Subject Matter in the Earlier Filed Application 305.02 Claimed Subject Matter the Same or Not Patentably Different 306 Assignment of Division, Continuation, Substitute, and Continuation-in-Part in Relation to Parent Case 307 Issue to Assignee 308 Notice of Allowance Where Application Is As- signed 309 Restriction Upon Employees of Patent Office # 301 1 Assignability of Patents and Appli- cations [R-27] 35 U.S.C. 261. Ownership; assignment. Subject to the provisions of this title. patents shall have the attributes of personal property. Applications for patent, patents, or any interest therein, shall be assignable in law by an instrument in writing. The applicant, patentee, or his assigns or legal representatives may in like manner grant and convey an exclusive right under his application for patent, or patents, to the whole or any specified part of the United States. A certificate of acknowledgment under the hand and official seal of a person authorized to administer oaths within the United States, or, in a foreign country, of a diplomatic or consular officer of the United States or an officer authorized to administer oaths whose author- ity is proved by a certificate of a diplomatic or consular officer of the United States, shall be prima face evidence of the execution of an assignment, grant or conveyance of a patent or application for patent. An assignment, grant, or conveyance shall be void as against any subsequent purchaser or mortgagee for valuable consideration, without notice, unless it is recorded in the Patent Office within three months from its date or prior to the date of such subsequent pur- chase or mortgage. Rule 331. Recording of assignments. (a) Assign- ments, including grants and conveyances, of patents or applications for patents under 35 U.S.C. 261. will be recorded in the Patent Office. Other instruments affecting title to a patent or application for patent. and licenses, even though the recording thereof may not serve as constructive notice under 35 U.S.C. 261, will be recorded as provided in this rule or in the dis- cretion of the Commissioner. (b) No instrument will be recorded which is not in the English language and which does not amount to an assignment, grant, mortgage, lien, incumbrance. or license, or which does not affect the title of the patent or invention to which it relates, and which does not identify the patent or application to which it relates. except as ordered by the Commissioner. (c) An instrument relating to a patent should iden- tify the patent by number and date (the name of the inventor and title of the invention as stated in the patent should also be given) ; an instrument relating to an application should identify the application by serial number and date of filing (the name of the inventor and title of the invention as stated in the application should also be given) but if an assignment is executed concurrently with or subsequent to the execution of the application but before the application is filed or before its serial number and filing date are ascertained, it should adequately identify the applica- tion, as by its date of execution and name of the inventor and title of the invention; so that there can be no mistake as to the patent or application intended. Rule 333. Conditional assignments. Assignments which are made conditional on the performance of certain acts or events, as the payment of money or other condition subsequent, if recorded in the Office are regarded as absolute assignments for Office pur- poses until cancelled with the written consent of both parties or by the decree of a competent court. The Office has no means for determining whether such conditions have been fulfilled. # 301.01 Accessibility of Assignment Records [R-22] Assignments relating to applications for reg- istration of trademarks are open to public inspection. The Office will not open certain parts only of an assignment document to public inspection. If such a document contains two or more items, any one of which, if alone, would be open to such inspection, then the entire document will be open. Thus, if an assignment covers either a trademark or a patent in addition to one or more patent applications, it will be available to the public ab initio; and if it covers a number of patent applications, it will be so available as soon as any one of them is patented. Assign- ments relating only to one or more pending applications for patent will not be open to pub- lic inspection. If the application on which a patent was granted is a division or continuation of an ear- lier case, the assignment records of that case will be open to public inspection ; similar situations <!-- PageFooter="Rev. 27. Jan. 1971" --> <!-- PageBreak --> <!-- PageHeader="MANUAL OF PATENT EXAMINING PROCEDURE" --> involving continuation-in-part applications will be considered on their individual merits. Assignment records relating to reissue appli- cations are open to public inspection. # 302 Effect of Recording [R-24] Rule 332. Receipt and recording. Assignments are recorded in regular order as promptly as possible, and then transmitted with the date and identification of the record stamped thereon to the persons entitled to them. The date of record is the date of the receipt of the assignment at the Office in proper form and accom- panied by the full legal fee for recording specified in 35 U.S.C. 41 (a) 10. The Patent Office will accept and record legi- ble certified copies of original assignments or other instruments. The certified copy, if not in the English lan- guage, will not be recorded unless accompanied by a translation signed by the translator. Certification shall be to the fact that the in- strument submitted is a true copy of the orig- inal and shall be made by a notary public or, if in a foreign country, by a consular officer of the United States or an officer authorized to admin- ister oaths and authenticated by a consular officer of the United States. Certification may also be made in the form of a declaration (Rule 68). # 303 Endorsing Assignments on Pend- ing Applications [R-24] The file wrapper of an application ordinarily does not display the endorsement of an assign- ment during the period an application is before an Examiner. The name of the assignee is endorsed on the file of an application only when it is submitted to the Assignment Branch for a title report. Therefore, the file wrapper cannot be relied upon to accurately reflect the assignment status of an application while it is pending before an Examiner. Title searches are automatically made in all applications after the payment of the issue fee. When the determination of the assignment condition of an application is significant, as in the factual situations represented by $§ 304 and 305, or when forwarding a form PO- 850 to the Board of Patent Interferences, it is necessary to submit the application to the As- signment Branch for a title report. # 304 Conflicting Subject Matter in Two Applications of Same Inventor, One of Which Is Assigned Where applicant has pending two applica- tions with overlapping subject matter therein. and assigns one of the applications in its en- tirety, which assignment is duly recorded in the Patent Office, the assigned application at once may become a reference against the sec- ond application for all common subject matter disclosed, irrespective of the dates of filing of the two applications, and also of any subse- quent assignment of the second case to an- other. # 305 Different Inventors, Common Ownership [R-22] Where there is a common assignee of two or more applications by different inventors involy- ing conflicting subject matter see § 804.03 and In re Stanley et al., 102 USPQ 234. Note, that in order to reject on the grounds of double patenting the cases must have the same inven- tive entity. See $ 804. Where the applications disclose and claim patentably different inventions, there being no overlap of claims, or where the earlier filed application has issued as a patent and has be- come a statutory bar before filing of the other application, no problems arise. # 305.01 Unclaimed Subject Matter in the Earlier Filed Application [R-24] If the second filed application claims subject matter disclosed but not claimed in the earlier filed application. 35 U.S.C. 102(e) applies and the earlier filed application is a reference (§ 706.02) unless it is removed (§ 715). ## 305.02 Claimed Subject Matter the Same or Not Patentably Dif- ferent [R-27] Where the applications by different inven- tors but of common ownership claim the same subject matter or subject matter that is not patentably different, questions of interference therebetween and with third parties are han- dled as indicated in $$ 804.03 and 1101.01 (b). ## 306 Assignment of Division, Contin- uation, Substitute and Continua- tion-in-Part in Relation to Parent Case [R-24] After the payment of the issue fee, a divi- sional, continuation, or substitute application is sent to the Assignment Branch where the as- signment of the original application is applied without charge to the later application, pro- <!-- PageFooter="Rev. 27. Jan. 1971" --> <!-- PageBreak --> <!-- PageHeader="OWNERSHIP AND ASSIGNMENT" --> vided the date of the assignment of the original application was before the filing of the later application. In the case of a continuation-in-part, a prior assignment of the original application is not applied to the continuation-in-part application because the assignment of the original applica- tion gives the assignee only the subject matter common to both applications. Continuation- in-part applications require separate assign- ments if they are to be issued to an assignee. The heading of the printed patent includes all identifying parent data of continuation-in- part, continuation, divisional, substitute, and reissue applications. It should be noted, how- ever, that inclusion of this information in the heading does not necessarily indicate that the claims are entitled to the benefit of the earlier filing date. The Assignment Branch has discontinued mailing notification in cases where there is a conflict in assignment between an original ap- plication and its divisional, continuation, sub- stitute, or continuation-in-part application. Where there are conflicting assignments, the patent will normally issue to the applicant. ### 307 Issue to Assignee [R-24] Rule 334. Issue of patent to assignec. In case of an assignment of the entire interest in the invention and application, or of the entire interest in the patent to be granted, the patent will normally issue to the as- signee. If the assignee should hold an undivided part interest, the patent will normally issue jointly to the inventor and the assignee If it is desired that the patent so issue the assignment in either case must first have been recorded, and at a day not later than the date payment is made of the issue fee or portion thereof specified in the notice of allowance. At the time of payment of the issue fee, a statement must be furnished indicating whether or not an assignment hes been filed with the Patent Office. In the event an assignment has been filed. such statement must in- clude the name of the assignee and indicate whether or not an acknowledgment of a recorded assignment has been received from the Patent Office. For the patent to normally issue to an as- signee, the assignment must be recorded in the Patent Office at a date not later than the day on which the issue fee is paid. Irrespective of whether the assignee partici- pates in the prosecution of the application, the patent issues to him unless there are conflicting assignments. # 308 Notice of Allowance Where Appli- cation Is Assigned [R-22] The Notice of Allowance provides for includ- ing the name of the assignee. # 309 Restrictions Upon Employees of Patent Office 35 U.S.C. 4. Restrictions on officers and employees as to interest in patents. Officers and employees of the Patent Office shall be incapable, during the period of their appointments and for one year thereafter, of applying for a patent and of acquiring, directly or in- directly, except by inheritance or bequest, any patent or any right or interest in any patent, issued or to be issued by the Office. In patents applied for there- after they shall not be entitled to any priority date earlier than one year after the termination of their appointment. <!-- PageFooter="382-764 0-70-2" --> <!-- PageFooter="Rev. 24, Apr. 1970" -->
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.